Quantcast

Do you think the former Soviet Union was really a threat to Western Europe after ww2? For example, without Nato would the Soviets invaded or was that just a scare tactic from our Governments as an excuse for military buildup?

sarah 2012/05/22 10:51:53
Related Topics: Government, Military, Europe
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Jeff Vader 2012/05/22 11:21:56
    They were a real threat and would have invaded western Europe
    Jeff Vader
    +5
    Stalin was a revolutionary Communist, his aim, which has been well documented, after WWII was to expand his territory well into western Europe and eventually make the whole of Europe communist and part of the soviet empire.

    Also at threat was much of Asia, particularly Japan and India, which were seen as "puppets of the west" as he was often heard to say in his speeches. The presence of the US in the region stopped most of the expansion.

    There was continuity after his death. That view of world communism persisted through many successive soviet leaders till well into the later part of the 20th century. Had NATO not existed I am sure the Soviet Union would be in control of the whole of Europe and a good slice of Asia as well.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • c.stuartHardwick 2012/07/15 01:24:37
    There was never a threat of invasion from the former Soviet Union
    c.stuartHardwick
    +1
    The soviets were scared and weak, and were far weaker than we ever thought. They needed our tanks and planes even to repel the NAZIs. The only reason they had the Bear bomber is because they reverse engineered a B25. The only reason they had MIGs in the 50s is because they had good British high-bypass jet engines to copy.
  • Catnip 2012/07/14 22:44:47
    They were a real threat and would have invaded western Europe
    Catnip
    +1
    The Soviets were a genuine threat to the West. The behavior of Josef Stalin and Nikita Kruschev speak volumes as to how much of a threat they were. Their imperialistic aims and their of the so-called "satallite" countries of the Warsaw Pact warned what were all in store for should they have expanded into West Berlin.

    And lets not forget Cuba.
  • Nimitz 2012/07/14 20:57:59 (edited)
    They were a real threat and would have invaded western Europe
    Nimitz
    Soviet style communism is probably not as metastatic as most people thought in the fifties, but it IS metastatic nevertheless. Let there be no doubt. Socialism/communism perpetuate themselves by cannibalism. Cannibalism (in this case manifested as imperialism/belligerence) is the ONLY way it can survive.

    And sure, 'capitalist' (or what passes for capitalist) countries can be just as guilty, but capitalism needn't rely on jingoism to survive. Socialism/communism MUST.
  • Swampdog 2012/06/30 21:44:44
    Undecided
    Swampdog
    +1
    Who ever is the "Most powerful Nation on Earth" needs to have a boogie man to rally the population behind. From 1945 till 1989 it was the USSR, then we, the US needed another boogie man, that became Saddam Hussein. In 1991 the US invaded Iraq under Bush 41, after 9/11 it became personal with Saddam Hussein and the new boogie man Osama bin Laden. Now that these two clowns are dead, we still have a boogie man, it's the nameless faceless, ageless terrorist! Governments have always used these tactics against it's people.
  • bobby 2012/06/30 00:40:33
    None of the above
    bobby
    Soviet Russia's Totalitarianism mythologised itself through relentless propaganda. Encouraging its people to believe that it was acting for the good of its proletariat. This was so effective that even other nations believed it for far too long.
    The Russian revolution was effectively a massive civil war between several different factions.The Bolsheviks incorporated or defeated the other protagonists leaving themseves in a position to determine government. Lenin and Trotsky were intellectuals with allegiance to Karl Marx's ideal of a new system of common ownership.
    Stalin was a thug who seized power and ruthlessly turned Russia into his own Dictatorship, run by his Politburo which only payed lip service to the altruistic ideals of Marxism. When the Nazis raised their ugly heads and war was begun, Stalin was perfectly happy to ally himself with Hitler, with each invading Poland from the opposite end. Only for the Germans to turn on the Russians when they met in the middle. Stalin then realised he should now side with the Allies.
    One of Stalin's worst kept secrets was the Soviet Union's lack of flexibility, Russia was the largest country in the world and just patrolling its numerous borders (especially with China), was a huge drain on its resources.
    Stalin had infused the country ...

    Soviet Russia's Totalitarianism mythologised itself through relentless propaganda. Encouraging its people to believe that it was acting for the good of its proletariat. This was so effective that even other nations believed it for far too long.
    The Russian revolution was effectively a massive civil war between several different factions.The Bolsheviks incorporated or defeated the other protagonists leaving themseves in a position to determine government. Lenin and Trotsky were intellectuals with allegiance to Karl Marx's ideal of a new system of common ownership.
    Stalin was a thug who seized power and ruthlessly turned Russia into his own Dictatorship, run by his Politburo which only payed lip service to the altruistic ideals of Marxism. When the Nazis raised their ugly heads and war was begun, Stalin was perfectly happy to ally himself with Hitler, with each invading Poland from the opposite end. Only for the Germans to turn on the Russians when they met in the middle. Stalin then realised he should now side with the Allies.
    One of Stalin's worst kept secrets was the Soviet Union's lack of flexibility, Russia was the largest country in the world and just patrolling its numerous borders (especially with China), was a huge drain on its resources.
    Stalin had infused the country with his own breed of paranoia (just as McCarthy would have done in the USA). The result was that a huge chunk of the soviet budget was tied up in internal security with people watching the people. Not to mention the economic inefficiency of not ensuring production was what the country needed.Thes factors together with rampant corruption by party officials and a booming black market left the Politburo with little to fight with other than their propagandising rhetoric, occasional overt military posturing, sponsoring revolutions in the third world by supplying arms and personnel, and their enthusiasm for cat and mouse espionage.
    When it came to invasions they marched into Hungary and Czechoslovakia (both already under their remit), but couldn't manage to stifle Tito in Communist Yugoslavia and got bogged down in Afghanistan.
    So, with the luxury of retrospection, I think it possible to say that the Soviet Union was not a threat, but they really wanted us to think they were.
    (more)
  • oros 2012/06/29 20:49:06
    There was never a threat of invasion from the former Soviet Union
    oros
    But they got that bloody POS Joe McCarthy riled up and boy did that make a lot of peoples lives hell.
    All overrated the threat that was once again the politicians made fools of people still doing it.
  • SilveryRow 2012/06/29 13:42:54
    Undecided
    SilveryRow
    I do not know enough about this to vote sensibly.
  • Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~ 2012/06/28 21:55:52
    There was never a threat of invasion from the former Soviet Union
    Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~
    +2
    The soviets were terrified of a western invasion and the west were terrified of a soviet invasion... Neither side ever had any intention of invading the other...
  • Mikel_mad2002 2012/06/28 20:01:53
    None of the above
    Mikel_mad2002
    +1
    Stalin was a mad man who did anything to secure his borders. However, the USSR was too weak immediately after WW2 to mount an invasion of the West
  • Lydecho Rain (Лидия) 2012/06/28 18:14:54
    There was never a threat of invasion from the former Soviet Union
    Lydecho Rain (Лидия)
    +3
    We defeated Hitler and therefore saved many lives. There wasn't a huge threat of invasion from CCCP.
  • ProudCommie 2012/05/24 22:15:23 (edited)
    There was never a threat of invasion from the former Soviet Union
    ProudCommie
    +1
    I don't think they would have attacked. It would have been an incredibly stupid move on their part at the time. They just finished fighting a long war with the Nazi's and the Americans barely did anything in WW2. They came into the fight last second and took all the credit. If anything the Soviets probably did use the whole thing as an excuse to rebuild their military.

    Just so you know even though I like the Soviet Union and Stalin to an extent. I wouldn't put it completely past them to take the stupid option. I'm just saying in my personal opinion its highly unlikely they would go that route; at least not right away.
  • sarah ProudCo... 2012/05/25 11:47:29
    sarah
    you can be proud of somthing but not like a murdering moron, being a communist does not mean you have to love or like to any extent every communist leader.
  • superan... sarah 2012/06/28 17:54:19
    superangrymonkey
    ^ smart
  • RobHom ProudCo... 2012/06/30 01:04:04
    RobHom
    I think your take on history is a bit erroneous or stunted. You might want to back up and take another look at reality.

    The US was embroiled in the war in the Pacific from 1941 on, then in Europe from 44 to the end. Prior to our entry into the European theater we were busy providing Stalin with materials and weaponry, as well as food and vehicles...and supporting other free countries. Americans were fighting in the military services of other countries long before Pearl Harbor.

    You need to remember that Stalin was stupid enough to get suckered by Hitler into signing a non-aggression treaty....which Hitler promptly violated....and invaded.

    Besides, Stalin was busy killing off his own people....and he killed off more people in Russia than Hitler did in all of Europe.....

    The ONLY reason that the USSR did not attempt to take western Europe was because we and our allies were in the way.
  • Radical communist 2012/05/24 17:05:34
    None of the above
    Radical communist
    STOP!!! The former Soviet Union carried the world the salvation from fatal contagion. I LIVE IN RUSSIA. It hurts to read your delusion about the USSR and socialism. I hate the phrases like "Stalin killed millions of innocents". Firstly, your magnitude of Stalin's repression is likely to be a big exaggeration and a lie. Secondly, almost in all cases Stalin repressed criminals and traitors that deserved it. At meetings I watch hugging the portraits of Stalin old ones who remember that time! Can't you understand you are brainwashed so that you don't oppose capitalist politics?! The Soviet Union was an Empire of Good, which carried the hope for saving of humanity; There existed other principles of life under the soviet socialism. We lived in society free from false values and hating each other, from greed and vulgarity. Isn't it simple happiness to live so? Most importantly, there was process of creation and labor, not consumption in the center: Such a system would ensure peaceful coexistence to all counries and the conservation of natural resources for many years. But west association of the influential wealthy changed other way. The Union didn't collapse by itself, it was destroyed by certain people with support from the West. This occurred because Gorbachev and his team destroy...
    STOP!!! The former Soviet Union carried the world the salvation from fatal contagion. I LIVE IN RUSSIA. It hurts to read your delusion about the USSR and socialism. I hate the phrases like "Stalin killed millions of innocents". Firstly, your magnitude of Stalin's repression is likely to be a big exaggeration and a lie. Secondly, almost in all cases Stalin repressed criminals and traitors that deserved it. At meetings I watch hugging the portraits of Stalin old ones who remember that time! Can't you understand you are brainwashed so that you don't oppose capitalist politics?! The Soviet Union was an Empire of Good, which carried the hope for saving of humanity; There existed other principles of life under the soviet socialism. We lived in society free from false values and hating each other, from greed and vulgarity. Isn't it simple happiness to live so? Most importantly, there was process of creation and labor, not consumption in the center: Such a system would ensure peaceful coexistence to all counries and the conservation of natural resources for many years. But west association of the influential wealthy changed other way. The Union didn't collapse by itself, it was destroyed by certain people with support from the West. This occurred because Gorbachev and his team destroyed welfare of the country. I'm sorry, but for the time being, the USA remains a county-devourer, Evil empire because its government contributed to the destruction of many countries including the USSR, Yugoslavia, Libya. Please, don't listen to american anticommunist myth! Capitalism is a stupid system of devouring each other, which сan destroy the humanity. Money can't buy happiness! And it's pointless to live for increasing private welfare! Or do you like to turn into a pig? Please, discard your myths and join communists! Russia will be socialist, USA, EU too. In confirmation, look which party has actually won russian elections 2011: izbircom2011.ru. Now, do you believe?! (If I made any grammatical mistakes, tell me, please.)
    (more)
  • sarah Radical... 2012/05/24 18:20:52 (edited)
    sarah
    lmao, its good to by loyal to your country but give me a break, I can't stop laughtingl sorry the empire of your motherland fell, but lol, USSR ruined Eastern Euripe, one just has to see the difference between East and west Germany before they were reunited to see that. Keep dreaming, but I'm not falling for your lies or maybe misinformation, or propaganda, I suppose old habits are hard to break. Have a nice day
  • Radical... sarah 2012/05/25 15:22:51
    Radical communist
    We had to stop evil of capitalism.
  • superan... Radical... 2012/06/28 17:55:11
    superangrymonkey
    +1
    Good work btw. How'd that work out?
  • Radical... superan... 2012/06/28 18:19:10
    Radical communist
    We would have won. The Union didn't collapse by itself, it was destroyed by certain people with support from the West. This occurred because Gorbachev and his team destroyed welfare of the country.
  • superan... Radical... 2012/06/28 18:32:19
    superangrymonkey
    +1
    Woulda shoulda coulda... didn't. Cry more.
  • none 2012/05/22 22:36:48
    They were a real threat and would have invaded western Europe
    none
    There's no question about it.
  • reaper 2012/05/22 20:15:20
    They were a real threat and would have invaded western Europe
    reaper
    up until some time in the 80's they did pose as one. but mostly when stalin was in power
  • Scout 2012/05/22 18:57:48
    They were a real threat and would have invaded western Europe
    Scout
    Their doctrine was always to spread soviet communism across the globe. Had they actually come across the border, however, NATO would have handed them their asses.
  • Kaimeso 2012/05/22 12:30:42
    They were a real threat and would have invaded western Europe
    Kaimeso
    +1
    Just ask the people of Eastern Europe, like those in Poland or Hungary, perhaps Romania or Bulgaria,..
  • Bingo's Faddah 2012/05/22 12:01:41
    They were a real threat and would have invaded western Europe
    Bingo's Faddah
    +1
    Back then folks knew what to expect from others. Look what happened in Korea. Without a strong "allied" presence in Europe the godless, baby killing commie bastards would have overrun Europe.
    They would have never held on to it though as their monetary reserves were about gone and their mineral wealth remained largely unexploited. Interesting question; well done!

    bastards overrun europe monetary reserves mineral wealth remained unexploited interesting
  • Scott 2012/05/22 11:34:02
    There was never a threat of invasion from the former Soviet Union
    Scott
    +2
    Communism would never have taken over the world. History has taught us that no single idealogy can take over the whole world. So many great powers have tried and failed. There's only so much of this planet that one nation can own.
  • Kaimeso Scott 2012/05/22 12:26:32
    Kaimeso
    Europe is not the world.
  • Scott Kaimeso 2012/05/22 14:53:56
    Scott
    No it is not. There were always countries willing to resist the might of the soviet union. Finland being one of the most resistant. God bless that beautiful country.
  • Kaimeso Scott 2012/05/23 17:03:02
    Kaimeso
    +1
    Finland was always a thorn in the side of the Russians and each time they went to war, the Fins kicks Ruski ass.
  • Jeff Vader 2012/05/22 11:21:56
    They were a real threat and would have invaded western Europe
    Jeff Vader
    +5
    Stalin was a revolutionary Communist, his aim, which has been well documented, after WWII was to expand his territory well into western Europe and eventually make the whole of Europe communist and part of the soviet empire.

    Also at threat was much of Asia, particularly Japan and India, which were seen as "puppets of the west" as he was often heard to say in his speeches. The presence of the US in the region stopped most of the expansion.

    There was continuity after his death. That view of world communism persisted through many successive soviet leaders till well into the later part of the 20th century. Had NATO not existed I am sure the Soviet Union would be in control of the whole of Europe and a good slice of Asia as well.
  • Anonymo... Jeff Vader 2012/06/28 21:59:53
    Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~
    That's a load of rubbish. Trotsky wanted to expand, Stalin wanted to make the USSR strong. He wanted the middle east for its oil and that's it.
  • Jeff Vader Anonymo... 2012/06/29 04:43:06
    Jeff Vader
    I suggest you read your history, your only 16, some of us lived through the communist era, Stalin killed, imprisoned or starved to death at least 20 million of his own people. The Russians invaded Hungary and Czechoslovakia and killed thousands to stop democratic reform. Look who's talking rubbish now.
  • Anonymo... Jeff Vader 2012/06/29 10:15:18
    Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~
    +1
    I studied the Cold War in history, thank you very much, and the point still stands - Stalin didn't want to invade anywhere, he was terrified the west would try to attack him again, and he wanted control over Eastern Europe as a buffer zone so the West couldn't attack him. He had absolutely no intention of invading the west, apart from West Berlin, which he wanted because it was a weak point in his defence. He didn't want democratic reform because he didn't want any country to leave the Warsaw Pact, which would create a weak point in his defences.
  • Jeff Vader Anonymo... 2012/06/30 02:15:05 (edited)
    Jeff Vader
    The soviet empire immediately after world war II, annexed the Warsaw pact countries, It abolished free elections and imposed Communist state control against the wishes of their populations. It banned all democratic parties and pluralism, It made being part of another political party a treasonable offence in which many were executed. This all happened during Stalin's era. Not one of the Warsaw pact counties that gained independence from the soviet block remained communist, this shows that Stalin imposed these governments.

    Stalin also supplied pilots and planes to the North Koreans in 1950.there are numerous other documents in the KGB archives that show Stalin's covert support and funding for extremists in western Europe. All as a prelude to what Stalin hoped would be an eventual destabilization and assimilation of the democratic west.

    I suggest you read "Stalin: The Myth and the Reality" and the newly released book called "Stalin's Last Crime" It is a compilation of evidence from the KGB archive showing Stalin's psychotic antisemitism, and his desire to invade the West right up until his death 1953.
    http://www.harpercollins.com/...
  • Anonymo... Jeff Vader 2012/06/30 10:24:09
    Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~
    Indeed. He annexed these countries to protect the USSR from the west, so he could stop any invasion before they reached the USSR. He had no intentions of taking the west - he didn't care about expansion. He was terrified of a western invasion, and didn't want to go anywhere near the west. Brezhnev was sympathetic to spreading communism, but only helped when communists asked for help to gain control.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/06/20 09:37:11

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals