Do you think that there should be Pro-Life Clinics , set up to reduce abortions, and should they be funded with equal tax payer funds as are given to Planned Parenthood ?

by Jackie G - Poker Playing Patriot Posted 2012/06/09 15:41:50

Related Topics: Planned Parenthood, Abortion, Tax, Parenthood, Life

Read More

28 votes
Read all 26 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes, because.......	15 votes	54%
	No, because.........	13 votes	46%

Add a comment above

safari 2012/06/09 19:19:12

No, because.........

+3
I needed an undecided - I chose no because I don't think the gov should be funding planned parenthood to begin with. So for the same reasons I don't think they should fund an equal but opposite organization either.
>> See Replies

More polls by Jackie G - Poker Playing Patriot

Sayer Stewart 2012/08/15 01:10:49

Yes, because.......

+1
It's only fair.

reply
Danielle 2012/08/06 19:08:07

Yes, because.......

+2
If we are stuck funding Planned Parenthood, then sure, why not, since it would be "Even Steven."

reply
Demoness 2012/08/06 13:14:12

Yes, because.......

+2
these babies have a right to live...

reply
TuringsChild 2012/08/06 06:46:22

Yes, because.......

+1
No other group except the military and judicial are allowed to make life-ending decisions. Mothers should not be encouraged to kill their own offspring. Planned Parenthood deliberately denies information to mothers-to-be in order to make abortions easier to stomach, at least until the deed is done. In all fairness, SOMEONE needs to speak up for the smallest and most helpless among us.

reply
Michelle 2012/08/06 05:42:14

Yes, because.......

+2
If they're funding Planned Parenthood, they probably should also be funding a pro-life unplanned pregnancy center which is advertised as a place to go to for help-- a center for crisis pregnancies that will give you any support you need, help you arrange adoption, ect. However, I don't think either should be given tax-payer funds.

reply
laydeelapis 2012/08/06 03:12:23

No, because.........

+1
What would they even do? Give speeches on not having an abortion? It seems kinda a pointless organization.

reply
KingdomNow 2012/08/06 03:06:09

Yes, because.......

+2
They would offer much more than a reward for irresponsible behavior.

reply
sjalan 2012/08/06 02:21:24

No, because.........

+1
Rather simple answer. People who would be in favor of Anti-abortion don't need the services which Planned Parenthood offers.

reply
Pixie·MzAwesome♠ƤĦĂĔŢ♠ 2012/08/06 02:08:30
Tee Quake 2012/08/06 02:00:43

Yes, because.......

+1
That's actually a very good idea. Having a baby can certainly be every bit as traumatic a decision as terminating a pregnancy. So long as they were not used to preach to people about their views on abortion, but were there as a resource for people who needed the help and support. I mean, isn't that the way Planned Parenthood is supposed to operate, also?

reply
conservyT to Tee Quake 2012/08/06 20:20:13

Planned Parenthood also preaches to people on their views why it's quite alright to abort.

reply
Ken 2012/08/06 01:58:04

Yes, because.......

+2
Or better yet, no funds to either.

reply
gregaj7 2012/06/09 21:09:55

Yes, because.......

+1
Nice idea, but won't happen.

reply
Artist 2012/06/09 19:43:51

Yes, because.......

+2
Now there's a good idea! And fair's fair, they should get federal funding...afterall, they are saving lives!

reply
safari 2012/06/09 19:19:12

No, because.........

+3
I needed an undecided - I chose no because I don't think the gov should be funding planned parenthood to begin with. So for the same reasons I don't think they should fund an equal but opposite organization either.

reply
Jackie ... to safari 2012/06/09 19:21:12

+1
Good answer - the logic I was looking for!

reply
safari to Jackie ... 2012/06/09 19:22:28

+1
Every once in a while I get one right! lol :)

reply
Jackie ... to safari 2012/06/09 19:24:37

+1
How are you doing buddy?? We went on a three week vacation and had such fun - toured the west coast from Northern California to Seattle along highway 101 - absolutely gorgeous.

reply
safari to Jackie ... 2012/06/09 19:30:28

+1
That sounds awesome! I need a three week vacation!
lol

I did 101 in Cali But haven't been up to WA - I bet it was really beautiful.

So glad you had a good time. Welcome back.

reply
bluelady 2012/06/09 16:08:28

Yes, because.......

+2
good idea...we have a pro life clinic here but it sure isnt funded except by our donations

reply
Jackie ... to bluelady 2012/06/09 18:34:38

Great

reply
Lady Whitewolf 2012/06/09 15:46:58

No, because.........

+1
I second Vennie

reply
Jackie ... to Lady Wh... 2012/06/09 15:52:08

+1
Thanks for stopping by

reply
Vennie 2012/06/09 15:46:18

No, because.........

+3
What would be the point? IF a woman is pregant and wishes to bring the baby to term all she needs are periodic visits to a OB/GYN until time for delivery. What services would be offered by a "pro-life" clinic? There are already agencies in place to provide aid for indigent pregant women, like prenatal vitamins, exams, etc.

reply
stevegt... to Vennie 2012/06/09 15:49:50 (edited)

+2
i think she means something like this for women who might be "indigent" or something...... http://images.christianpost.c... (they will let the woman stay there, because probably most often the woman would be harassed by the family for being pregnant and not married, etc. etc......or other reasons that are personal to the woman, and should be respected.). (i knew a lady once who was considering going to live at a place like this as an option for her newborn, not yet born child...i think she went and moved back in with her husband or something.....)

reply
Jackie ... to Vennie 2012/06/09 15:50:51

+2
Excluding abortion, all that you cite - wouldn't it be fair to fund a group that did not do abortions with the same dedication as the one who does abortions

reply