Do you like body/ facial piercings?
CircusFreak13
2012/06/16 22:50:59
|
|
|||||
|
65 votes
|
|
33% | |||
|
23 votes
|
|
12% | |||
|
10 votes
|
|
5% | |||
|
75 votes
|
|
38% | |||
|
26 votes
|
|
13% | |||
Top Opinion
-
flrdsgns 2012/06/17 17:01:57neither





















Nose piercing is not bad.
But sometimes people go a little overboard.
That's the extent of my facial piercings. Ahaha. Some people can pull off more, but I think usually it just detracts from their natural beauty. So, this is all I have pierced, besides my ears. :p
Or better yet, give us some arguments and evidence to justify your mindless Atheist belief that No God exists. No excuses - just your evidence..
Here is a very cursory outline of some of the best evidences for God.The full arguments and evidences are not NOT adequately explained here. This is a very compacted outline I put together - not comprehensive.
Contingency – Why does something exist rather than nothing? Something cannot begin from nothing without a cause, so Something must self-exist. Self-existence is necessary. Self –creation is impossible. The Universe began. Universe is not self-existent. Universe requires a causally antecedent agency to explain it’s existence. God does not – no beginning.
Cosmological – Absolute beginning requires a cause. Cause of Physical Universe cannot be Physical. Must be non-physical, space-less, timeless and willful to cause Physical Universe from Physical Nothingness.
Design: Specified ordered and integrated interdependencies aimed towards a third-purpose design objectives clearly infer intelligent agency. ‘Chance’ events within limited time-frames cannot rationally account for Design achievements No plausible Naturalistic mechanisms or explanations actually exist. Origin of rad...
Or better yet, give us some arguments and evidence to justify your mindless Atheist belief that No God exists. No excuses - just your evidence..
Here is a very cursory outline of some of the best evidences for God.The full arguments and evidences are not NOT adequately explained here. This is a very compacted outline I put together - not comprehensive.
Contingency – Why does something exist rather than nothing? Something cannot begin from nothing without a cause, so Something must self-exist. Self-existence is necessary. Self –creation is impossible. The Universe began. Universe is not self-existent. Universe requires a causally antecedent agency to explain it’s existence. God does not – no beginning.
Cosmological – Absolute beginning requires a cause. Cause of Physical Universe cannot be Physical. Must be non-physical, space-less, timeless and willful to cause Physical Universe from Physical Nothingness.
Design: Specified ordered and integrated interdependencies aimed towards a third-purpose design objectives clearly infer intelligent agency. ‘Chance’ events within limited time-frames cannot rationally account for Design achievements No plausible Naturalistic mechanisms or explanations actually exist. Origin of radically sophisticated DNA information (software) driving molecular highly sophisticated molecular machines within each cell. Also, the design inference from irreducible complexity cannot and certainly has not been adequately explained.
Precision FINELY TUNED constants and quantities present in initial conditions of the Universe to within infinitesimally narrow ranges to permit life. Universe is precision balanced on razor’s edge. This is virtual mathematical proof of intent – a function of mind – is necessary to explain these precision orderings.
Ontological argument – God is a metaphysically necessary Being. Since God’s attributes are metaphysically possible, and all metaphysical possibilities must also be actual if possible, God must be actual.
Intelligence in Nature: Intelligence, order and reason and information all from Nothingness?
Spiritual instinct of man: Evolved to connect with something not actual?
Free-will: Chemical causation is not free-will. Agency requires a soul. Chemicals have no moral duties.
Moral Truth / Apprehension of Objective moral truth. Is rape really wrong or just an illusion? Is rape just a natural chemical byproduct caused by electrochemical activity (Atheism) – or an act of will.
Massive Historical evidences of witnessed Miracles, visions, fulfilled prophecies,.
Personal experiences: Ubiquitous NDE’s, supernatural phenomena
Christ’s resurrection witnessed by hundreds.
Absolute failure of Naturalism to explain a Finely tuned Universe, Finite Universe, Sentience, Rational truth and natural order, Moral Law (morality), intuition, intentionality, intelligence, purpose, free-will…
You call preachers bigots and mock people who believe in God as belief in a 'sky daddy'. I nail you and you demand an apology?
You are dead wrong about physical evidence, A physical Universe from nothing (Big Bang), Fine tuning of the early cosmos and design inferences from molecular biology are all physical evidence.
Do you seriously demand direct physical observation of a non-physical Mind (God)? Think about that.
Can't you read?
I thought Christians were supposed to be loving and kind. Oh well, I could care less :)