Yep , Genesis 1:26-27 = all 4 races both genders similtaneously on the 6th day ;
and then on the 1st day of the 2nd week , the specific man named Adam & Eve - she came from him & they were the 1st that would later be called Jewish (Luke 3:23) .
Man created God (the God of the bible, anyway) in his own image. That's why God is often angry, jealous, vengeful and inconsistent. It's also why God is often kind, forgiving, loving and caring. Rather than being a perfect being, the God of the bible is perfectly complex conundrum, just like the people who wrote him.
There is no evidence our species was created by magic, never mind the 150 years of compounding evidence from dozens of scientific fields that clearly shows a much more reasonable conclusion.
Evolution the way it is taught today is a fairy tale. Mathematics has proven it is a fable. The chances of a single amino acid being created by chance which is astoundingly impossible. According to evolutionist from the beginning of time until now there was 10 to the 16 seconds. If you were able to take the possibility particle interactions per second you get a possible number of interactions of particle at 10 to the 139. The probability of producing a single 150 amino acid functional protein by chance is 10 to the 164. Now that is just the chance of one amino acid functional protein and how many are in the human body?
Even if your math was correct (it isn't), if there was a one in 10 to the 164th chance of life as it exists now happening, time and space are infinite, so there are an infinite number of opportunities for life to emerge. Even if your math is correct, and there is no God, there are still an infinite number of universes exactly like ours somewhere out there in space.
It is clear that stellar, solar geological and biological evolution happened. If awareness and intelligence--such as it is--is the mark of a god, then we are gods. Doubtless there are billions of gods on other planets "out there."
????What???? This is not meant to be derogatory, but you seem to have a very basic misunderstanding of science and of those who base their philosophies in science. In my view, one does not "believe" in any science. One accepts the findings of science because one understand the Scientific Method, which is nothing like believing in a god. One's theology most often consists in those propositions you and I, as children, were TAUGHT to believe. Science requires evidence. Belief only requires a believer.
I can only suppose by your conjecture, that you have heard/read about the Higgs boson, whimsically called the "God Particle," which, it is theorized, if found, will expose to our minds the very fabric of the universe, and lead us to a far greater understanding existence itself.
But such things are no more intelligent and creative, than is your kitchen table.
Please elaborate on your statement. I can see no other basis for it. And, by the way, the "laws" of nature are DESCRIPTIVE, not "prescriptive." I think most religious folks don't see that.
Sidebar: I like that name, Keyona. Was it derived from your historical ethnicity, and does it have a meaning?
Edit was to add two mission words in the last sentence/question.
and then on the 1st day of the 2nd week , the specific man named Adam & Eve - she came from him & they were the 1st that would later be called Jewish (Luke 3:23) .
There is no evidence our species was created by magic, never mind the 150 years of compounding evidence from dozens of scientific fields that clearly shows a much more reasonable conclusion.
But I believe He created man before the Jewish line starting from Adam.
that would be
capital 'G' in God,
and Y.E.S ~ He DID ;0 )
I can only suppose by your conjecture, that you have heard/read about the Higgs boson, whimsically called the "God Particle," which, it is theorized, if found, will expose to our minds the very fabric of the universe, and lead us to a far greater understanding existence itself.
But such things are no more intelligent and creative, than is your kitchen table.
Please elaborate on your statement. I can see no other basis for it. And, by the way, the "laws" of nature are DESCRIPTIVE, not "prescriptive." I think most religious folks don't see that.
Sidebar: I like that name, Keyona. Was it derived from your historical ethnicity, and does it have a meaning?
Edit was to add two mission words in the last sentence/question.