Do you believe in the Death Penalty?
Sister Jean
2012/05/05 18:46:13
|
|
|||||
|
73 votes
|
|
52% | |||
|
51 votes
|
|
36% | |||
|
16 votes
|
|
11% | |||
Top Opinion
-
Mark 2012/05/05 19:51:47no























The heinous guilty need only to be removed from society for all time to serve the public good.
Don't get me wrong, I understand that the death penalty is not really a deterrent, but there are some people that no longer should be breathing our air. And if the idea that they will die for doing something bad enough, at least we can prevent them from continuing their life.
But I don't think I could pull the switch.
http://news.yahoo.com/wrong-m...
Not only do I not believe in government ran executions, I am against concentration camps (prisons as they're so called), and everything else that governments, corporations, academic institutions, and religions do. Since this is an issue specific to governments, I will only deal with governments for the purpose of this thread.
As much as I would like to see bankers, police, attorneys, business men, and other people who participate in parasitic occupations thrown in rafts in the middle of the Atlantic and eating alive by sharks for their crimes against civilization, I would never advocate for even them to be executed in the name of the organization called the state or even executed at all.
Nothing governments do is scientific, and everything governments do as is the case with the other 3 types of institutions is to keep themselves in business NOT to benefit the public. One example of this is the fact that one can be prosecuted for ...
Not only do I not believe in government ran executions, I am against concentration camps (prisons as they're so called), and everything else that governments, corporations, academic institutions, and religions do. Since this is an issue specific to governments, I will only deal with governments for the purpose of this thread.
As much as I would like to see bankers, police, attorneys, business men, and other people who participate in parasitic occupations thrown in rafts in the middle of the Atlantic and eating alive by sharks for their crimes against civilization, I would never advocate for even them to be executed in the name of the organization called the state or even executed at all.
Nothing governments do is scientific, and everything governments do as is the case with the other 3 types of institutions is to keep themselves in business NOT to benefit the public. One example of this is the fact that one can be prosecuted for resisting abduction from their thugs in costume, the term for that is resisting arrest, that is no different than a mugger suing someone for resisting a mugging, and prosecution for resisting abduction from thugs in costume in any kind of sane world would never be allowed, but then again in a sane world governments, corporations, academic institutions, and religions would not exist.
Governments don't know how to solve problems, nor do they give a damn because all they care about is keeping themselves in business that's why governments don't do anything scientific, think about it, who are governments comprised of, what kind of people from what kind of occupations? Attorneys, Business Men, Bankers, Monetary Investors, etc etc etc, there are NO scientists in parliaments, and senates, etc, either social scientists, or physical scientists at all.
Why is this? If you study the legal systems of any state system on the planet, and they're all the same, you will find the half of their sheets of paper called laws are there to regulate sex, and the half are there to regulate money so what does that tell us? Governments are there to ENFORCE monogamy, and ENFORCE the monetary system, NOT to manage resources and infrastructures which should be obvious by the very poor job they do at managing resources, and infrastructures, they are there to manage people.
That's why governments have concentration camps instead of free housing for people, that's why governments have thugs in costume to abduct people and take them to concentration camps for sex, or for taking food from a store, and guys in black dresses in buildings called court houses to administer the punishment in a concentration camp. And what's even MORE INSANE about his is the fact that governments have the power to KEEP PEOPLE LIVING UNDER THEIR STATE SYSTEM CONFINED TO THEIR ARTIFICIAL IMAGINARY GEOGRAPHICAL BOUNDARIES, THEY CAN KEEP SOMEONE FROM LEAVING THEIR IMAGINARY BOUNDARIES!
What's the point of all this? The point of all this is to keep themselves in business just as Target The retailer corporation is advocating for a sales tax on internet purchases because it poses competition to their stores. Government are not a damn bit interested in solving problems, they're interested ONLY in keeping themselves in business just like Corporations, Academic Institutions, and Religions. Therefore they're not interested in solving problems because solving problems WOULD PUT THEM OUT OF BUSINESS! Which is exactly what needs to happen!
So how do we solve problems?
Definitely not by abducting someone, and taking away their freedom for society considers aberrant behavior which is very subjective because we've been taught what is aberrant by governments, and as I stated clearly, NOTHING governments do is anywhere close to scientific. Sex is NOT aberrant behavior so that's not something that society should be involved in at all other than to allow all people sexual freedom that's why I am an advocate for polyamory/polygamy, monogamy is a FAILED system because humans both male, and female are NOT biologically wired for monogamy.
How do we solve actions that ACTUALLY DO OBJECTIVELY QUALIFY AS ABERRANT BEHAVIOR such as mugging, murder, pedophilia, burglary, etc.
Instead of CONCENTRATION CAMPS which are AN OFFENSIVE USE OF LAND! Shut those down, and turn those into:
1. Build Free Housing for people comprised of fireproof materials eliminating the need for fire departments, and codes, and all that, and design the housing high-rises with natural built in climate control, that can be done buy using materials that naturally cool down in hot weather, and naturally warm up in cold weather, reducing the need for electricity by a whole lot, a huge percentage of electricity usage is for climate control. And Yes I mean FREE! Make it available without ANY DEBT OR FORCED SERVITUDE!
2. Switch the food infrastructure to AEROPONIC agriculture IMMEDIATELY! We need to STOP using the archaic form of agriculture that's still in place for no reason other than to keep governments, and corporations in business! It wastes land, and we get minimal food production from it. Aeroponic produces 5X the yield of fruits, vegetables, herbs, and seed of the dinosaur agriculture we're using now, can be set up in any building, virtually runs itself once in operation, requires minimal human involvement to operate it, and EVERYTHING IS ORGANIC! Gone GONE would be the days of paying for food!
3. We need to wrap our heads around the fact that EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT TO EQUAL ACCESS TO THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION! NO MORE PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF RESOURCES! And for you brainless people reading this, I am not talking about all housing being shared, AGAIN EQUAL ACCESS TO THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION, AND TO RESOURCES! Everyone should have their dwelling to live in, and have whatever they want inside their dwelling as long as one is NOT using their dwelling, nor any of their possessions inside their dwelling to EXPLOIT OTHERS! A dwelling, and whatever you have inside for YOUR OWN PERSONAL ENJOYMENT, AND USE IS YOUR BUSINESS! Hopefully the brainless reading this GET THE DAMN POINT!
I'm like George Carlin, I get annoyed with people after about 22 seconds.
Those are only 3 examples of how a sustainable economic system that would solve problems.
Now you people on here who work for governments, corporations, academic institutions, and are religious I am fully aware will take issue with everything I am saying because this would put you people out of business, and to that I say, you people need to be shut down by any means necessary, because you people are hindering human progress.
In something WORTHY of being called civilization, there would be no governments, corporations, academic institutions, and religions, there would be no admins on the internet, there would be no management office in apartment complexes, there would be no surveillances cameras, and security in buildings, there would be no LINES at distribution centers for one to get what they need, they would simply be able to take what they need from the distributions center, and LEAVE, no security, no money in the equation, no standing in lines wasting time out of one's life to check out, or pay this stuff called money, money would NOT exist! THE MECHANICS OF EXCHANGE WOULD IN NO WAY EXIST! In something WORTHY of being called CIVILIZATION!
And for those who have arguments against what I am saying, one way to loose credibility with me VERY QUICKLY is by using the term utopia, so if you want to engage in a debate, and get respect from me DON'T USE THE TERM UTOPIA!
I a list of terms I would permanently remove from encyclopedias if I was in charge of those, and the term Utopia is on that list because it describes something that is NOT technically possible!
I believe ONLY heinous crimes deserve this punishment though. A simple killing, I would put under life without parole. But anything above that deserves the death penalty.
The way I see it, there are cases where people may kill to protect either themselves or their family. Even if it's not provable in court, the benefit of the doubt should be given to those that only kill for defensive purposes. However, if they can prove it was a horrendous circumstance, (Rape, mutilation, etc) that should be an executable offense.
It's late, but I'm hoping that makes sense.