
Dallas High Speed Car Chase Ends in T-Bone Car Crash: Should they let him die?
Creamy
June 30, 2009 00:04:04
The Dallas high speed car chase began as a routine traffic stop. Dallas police officer Curtis Hettich said the chase began when 29-year-old Shane Michel was notified of a federal warrant out for his arrest. Hettich had also asked to search Michel's vehicle on suspicion of on-board narcotics.
The Dallas high speed car chase lasted 2-hours and ended in a t-bone car crash with a truck driver named Lance Anderson, who sustained minor injuries. The accident occurred when Michel ran a red light. The high speed car chase included spike strips, jumping off ramps, and railing down signs.
After the t-bone accident, Shane Michel was sent to the Baylor University Medical Center. Shane is in critical condition.
Should Shane Michel be taken off life support for endangering countless lives and dealing drugs or should he rot in prison?
The Dallas high speed car chase lasted 2-hours and ended in a t-bone car crash with a truck driver named Lance Anderson, who sustained minor injuries. The accident occurred when Michel ran a red light. The high speed car chase included spike strips, jumping off ramps, and railing down signs.
After the t-bone accident, Shane Michel was sent to the Baylor University Medical Center. Shane is in critical condition.
Should Shane Michel be taken off life support for endangering countless lives and dealing drugs or should he rot in prison?
More polls by Creamy
Top Opinion
-
helmus July 05, 2009 12:41:05I think Michel Shane should be punished like this:+3Holy shit people, he didn't kill anyone excepyt nearly him self and he is giving the whole world some grade A entertainment, stop bitching and give that man the key to the city for making the world a less boring place!

See Votes by State
Loading map...
Living
May 25, 2012 05:03:37
Hot Questions on SodaHead
-
What Was the Best Season Finale?
-
Who's the Meanest Reality TV Judge?
-
Hottest Woman on Maxim's Hot 100 List?
- View more slideshows »









Firstly, I'm not going to discuss religion but just using ethics, logic, reasoning and an understanding of cause and effect, pulling the plug on someone just because they have done bad things is giving them an unfair disadvantage of survival that other people wouldn't have. Even if that didn't kill him it's just as bad as beating up a criminal because of their crime and I think that you should know better than to enforce justice without the right jurisdiction. Leave the choice up to who has the right to make that choice.
We are not the police, we are not his friends and family and we are not even anyone who was involved in the incident at all. In short, it is none of our business and we don't have a right to say yes or no.
That over, here is my point. How do we know that this man might not do something great with his life? Is it our choice to deny them the ability to mend their ways? Of course it's not. We should just treat him as we would do anyone-else on life support and keep him alive. If he wakes up then he will go to prison and then maybe he'll become a better person because of it. If so then he has been given the ...''''''
Firstly, I'm not going to discuss religion but just using ethics, logic, reasoning and an understanding of cause and effect, pulling the plug on someone just because they have done bad things is giving them an unfair disadvantage of survival that other people wouldn't have. Even if that didn't kill him it's just as bad as beating up a criminal because of their crime and I think that you should know better than to enforce justice without the right jurisdiction. Leave the choice up to who has the right to make that choice.
We are not the police, we are not his friends and family and we are not even anyone who was involved in the incident at all. In short, it is none of our business and we don't have a right to say yes or no.
That over, here is my point. How do we know that this man might not do something great with his life? Is it our choice to deny them the ability to mend their ways? Of course it's not. We should just treat him as we would do anyone-else on life support and keep him alive. If he wakes up then he will go to prison and then maybe he'll become a better person because of it. If so then he has been given the chance to mend his ways. If not then he got what he was going to get and it looks like the decision was made for us.
Next, by the sound of it he was not well and quite distressed. This could be the reason why he reacted this way. If so then killing someone because of their reaction due to them being unwell is no different to when the Nazi killed their people for being sick back in World War 2. This isn't Logan's Run where anyone who isn't the picture of health gets assassinated. Get real, there are other colors than black and white.
So, to finish, let his family make the decision. That's who would have done it anyway. And removing the life support is not making it God's decision because I doubt that anyone who had not done anything wrong would have their life support taken off them to let God decide, judging by these comments. By applying one rule to some people and another to others that makes it your decision you see. That's just plain obvious.
Please free to contact me with any question
Stacey
Please look at the links below
http://www.healthsquare.com/m...
http://www.helpguide.org/ment...
Jeeze what a bunch of tools...it is obvious who really did put the people at risk and it is not the druggie.
I don't believe anyone should be left on life support for any long period of time.
When and if he recovers, he should be thrown in jail for at least 15 years. He endangered many lives and it should be an attempted murder for everyone he passed.
Its been on tv enough. They only think of themselves and that's selfish and yes it endangers lives, possibly attempted murder. I'm tired of these guys getting away with it. They need to be put away and out of others lives.