Quantcast

Creation gains in Brazil. Will that help it spread worldwide?

Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/07/02 23:27:16
You!
Add Photos & Videos

The population of Brazil grows while those of other countries
shrinks. And higher proportions of those people now believe in creation.
That is, they believe that God created human beings and the world. More
to the point, they believe that this happened 10,000 years ago, or more
recently. This trend has run for at least seven years, while Brazil as a
country grows richer, not poorer. These facts suggest that Brazil will
be a powerful force in promoting creation, and specifically young-earth creation, worldwide.


Christianity in Brazil today

Yesterday, Andrea Madambashi of The Christian Post wrote that Brazil today has more evangelical Christians, and fewer Roman Catholics.
She compared numbers of evangelicals and Catholics ten years apart. She
also noticed one thing that suggests that the trend will only get
stronger. Evangelical Christianity in Brazil is clearly a movement of
the young. The Roman Catholic Church is the church of the old.


At first glance, one might take little from this article other than
“out with the old, in with the new.” But the Question Evolution campaign
points out one thing that Madambashi missed. That is: evangelical Christians are more likely to believe in creation than are Roman Catholics. This should surprise no one. Five years ago, Pope Benedict XVI denounced as “absurd” the clash between creation and evolution.


On one hand there is much scientific proof in favor of
evolution[. This] appears as a reality that we must see and which
enriches our understanding of life and being as such.


On the other hand, said His Holiness, evolution cannot say where
everything came from, nor to what end. (Of course not. Evolution
advocates frown at anyone who dares ask questions like that.)


This is where the Roman Catholic Church stands. Yet the RCC is
yielding to the evangelical movement. And that movement is not so quick
to believe the “scientific proofs” that so impressed His Holiness.


Creation in Brazil seven years ago
Rosinha Garotinho, who introduced creation into public schools in Rio

Rosinha Garotinho, Governor of Rio de Janeiro. Photo: Marcello Casal Jr/Agência Brasil, CC BY 3.0 Brazilian License


In 2004, Governor Rosinha Garotinho (a/k/a Rosinha Mateus) of Rio de Janeiro did something wild. She ordered that public schools in Rio would start teaching creation science as well as evolution. A year later, the Brazilian magazine Época surveyed the general public.


The results probably shocked them. Only nine percent of their sample accepted the strict naturalistic view of human origin.
Fifty-four percent accepted old-earth creation, the idea that man
appears millions of years ago but changed only as God said he would
change. Thirty-one percent accepted young-earth creation.


Furthermore, 89 percent of the sample agreed with what Governor
Garotinho did. 75 percent of the sample even said that creation should replace evolution in the schools.


Detractors of creation were quick to excuse the results. A government
official blamed the wording of the survey. The head of the Brazilian
Association for the Advancement of Science called the results a sign of
poor-quality science education. But if that were true, then fewer people
with advanced degrees should believe in creation than people without.
(God forbid they should simply be wrong and the people finally getting
wise to them!)


The survey results did not bear this out. Only ten percent of advanced degree holders accepted the naturalistic view, and six percent of non-holders.


Creation in Brazil and elsewhere moving forward

Consider, then, the trends. A politician in Brazil introduces creation into public schools. And the people say, in effect,


Go for it!


Seven years later comes evidence that young people in Brazil are
embracing a new church movement that welcomes young-earth creation
thought. And no one can, with justice, lay this to poor education.


Brazil is not even a poor country. It is rich, and getting richer. And some of them are spending their money to promote creation and “question evolution.”

Eric Kaufman (see video in original article) recently told a secular audience that “the religious [shall] inherit the earth.” The reason: secular countries are not even having enough children to replace those who die every year. Their populations are shrinking, while populations in highly religious countries, like Brazil, are growing.

Creation advocates in Brazil are cooperating with creation advocates in the United States and elsewhere. The Question Evolution campaign is not the only example. The Northwest Creation Network’s “Encyclopedia of Creation Science” (CreationWiki) opened a Portuguese site three years ago. A Brazilian émigrée to the United States was its first contributor. This year, a Brazilian resident took that site over and started to expand it. This might or might not be significant: he was born in Rio, the same State where Rosinha Garotinho now governs.

OK. What say you? Will this help spread belief in creation to the rest of the world?

Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/07/02...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Pat 2012/07/03 01:41:46 (edited)
    No.
    Pat
    +9
    All this means is that the rest of the world is becoming as bat s--t crazy as the evangelicals in the U. S.


    creationism

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Scandalf 2012/08/16 09:35:24
    Undecided
    Scandalf
    I think that the advancement in the peoples lifestyle will induce the contrary.
  • Marianne 2012/08/12 08:01:20
    Undecided
    Marianne
    I don't think that with all the scientific facts about evolution, creationism can incite instructed people to change their beliefs.

    But if education spreads unrealistic information instead of knowledge among the young generations, I am afraid that fanatism, ignorance and hatred will destroy the future of our planet.
  • Ben 2012/07/19 09:26:29
    No.
    Ben
    No. The US is by far the richest country but has had a hard time exporting the creationist views of many of its citizens to places like Europe (for example). Just because Brazil is getting richer will have little effect on whether others listen to their creationist views.
  • syl 2012/07/09 18:48:16
    Yes.
    syl
    +1
    People are getting tired of the same old story crammed down their throats all through school.
    Evolution is debunked by plenty of scientists-you can look them up & read their books.

    More smart people are realizing that creation is the only plausible answer, & the Biblical account of creation takes less faith to believe in it, than evolution.
  • gbrunea... syl 2012/10/26 08:30:42
    gbruneaulanglois
    Yeah sure...A dusty book written by a bunch of bearded men in the desert 2000 years ago is much more credible.
  • syl gbrunea... 2012/10/26 20:23:16
    syl
    +1
    Yes it is. Also we know that if there's one thing we've learned from history, is that we've not learned one thing from history.
    That's pathetic.
    so to have the roadmap for life in plain sight, for everybody to have-& not use it-actually make fun of it, & try to say that now we know "better", is insanity.

    Darwin only had a theory-actually not even that, but the world jumped on it, & preached it unceasingly, until people actually believed it-much like the lies Obama's campaign throws on the airwaves constantly. If you read the books by scientists who believe in creation, because everything proves it, you'll better be able to discern the truth.
  • JCD aka "biz" 2012/07/09 17:44:28
    No.
    JCD aka "biz"
    +1
    Thank you for stating very clearly that the Catholic Church (along with mainstream Protestant Churches) has accepted evolution.
  • American☆Atheist 2012/07/05 03:39:11
    No.
    American☆Atheist
    +1
    Science always wins
  • ScatterJoy! 2012/07/04 18:26:37
    No.
    ScatterJoy!
    +2
    The only reason it's spreading is because Christianity is a word-of-mouth religion that preys on the doubts and fears of ignorant people.

    Those of us who are more spiritually minded and open to listening to ALL credos have a deeper understanding of truth and reality. However, I would warrant we're in the distinct minority. Just goes to show that good ideas aren't necessarily the ones that catch.
  • Temlako... Scatter... 2012/07/04 18:47:52
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    And evolutionism is *not* a word-of-mouth doctrine that preys on the fears, uncertainties, and doubts of the gullible?
  • Scatter... Temlako... 2012/07/04 20:42:08 (edited)
    ScatterJoy!
    +2
    Nope- it's grounded in science rather than belief.
  • Temlako... Scatter... 2012/07/04 23:56:05
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    From what I have seen--and not only of evolutionistic attitudes but also of the *actual* physical evidence--what you have just said is impossible. You ground your theory in "anti-belief"--in a refusal to believe.

    And when I speak of fear, uncertainty, and doubt, I mean: "Accept this consensus, or we shall see that you never have a job."
  • Scatter... Temlako... 2012/07/05 01:14:22
    ScatterJoy!
    ok
  • Red Branch 2012/07/03 22:48:48
    Yes.
    Red Branch
    +1
    It could, but that thinking goes up against the powers that be within and without the US.
  • Maria 2012/07/03 21:49:16
    Yes.
    Maria
    +1
    psychologist argues that Evolution just playing with your mind...{just full of B.S.} Creation do not change at all...it nature that's go with creation than believe Evolution is always part or by marriage to science thing..
  • ScottyG - Faqueue 2012/07/03 19:23:35
    Yes.
    ScottyG - Faqueue
    +2
    If all the smart lefties think that man and all animals are just evolved mutations of simple cells, why can't they believe that intelligent design is more likely?
  • Scandalf ScottyG... 2012/08/16 15:57:53
    Scandalf
    ID is VERY different from Creationism! Check that out.
  • rand 2012/07/03 19:22:21
    Undecided
    rand
    +1
    It might in the short term, but ultimately only scientific truth will stand the test of time.
  • Headhunter 13 2012/07/03 17:29:31
    No.
    Headhunter 13
    It is really sad that in this day and age we still spread hate and superstition through religion.
  • Racefish 2012/07/03 17:10:48
    No.
    Racefish
    Myth based and unscientific. There is proof that Brazil had a culture at least that long in the, now, overgrown rain forest. At the time the climate could have been far different.
  • Doc 2012/07/03 14:18:43
    Yes.
    Doc
  • texasred 2012/07/03 13:53:22
    Undecided
    texasred
    +2
    But I hope so.
  • beach bum 2012/07/03 08:58:06
    Yes.
    beach bum
  • Radical Ed 2012/07/03 08:16:59 (edited)
    No.
    Radical Ed
    +4
    some people just want to watch the world burn in ignorance.

    belief
  • Doc Radical Ed 2012/07/03 14:20:10
    Doc
    +3
    Just remember, my friend, that reality feels the same way about what you believe, too.
  • Radical Ed Doc 2012/07/03 14:26:42
    Radical Ed
    +2
    i have no doubt about that. the way i work with it is through logical inference: "this is my beliefs; these are the facts; my beliefs contradict the facts therefore my beliefs are wrong;".
  • Doc Radical Ed 2012/07/03 18:33:12
    Doc
    +2
    me, too. Yet, here we are, an atheist and a christian.
    :-)
  • Temlako... Radical Ed 2012/07/04 18:49:25
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    Nor your rebellious attitude, nor your strong delusion that makes you believe lies.
  • Radical Ed Temlako... 2012/07/04 19:05:16
    Radical Ed
    i base my understanding on the natural world, not the supernatural. that is not rebellious, it's just simple rational and empirical thought.
  • Temlako... Radical Ed 2012/07/04 19:38:59
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    So you say. But what you won't admit is that certain signs in the physical world just plain *don't add up* to something just popping in out of nothing, life crawling out of a chemical soup, etc.
  • Radical Ed Temlako... 2012/07/04 20:00:12 (edited)
    Radical Ed
    +1
    Simply because I don't know a certain thing doesn't mean i will put something there to satisfy myself. until new evidence arises all i can say is i don't know. if someone claims something then i will look at the evidence objectively and see where it leads.

    i leave belief to things more personal e.g. trust in a friend or a family member, whether homosexuality is fine, should the death penalty be OK. it has no business in my understanding of reality.
  • Temlako... Radical Ed 2012/07/04 20:01:52
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    That hasn't been workable even from the beginning. All I see, from you and those with whom you are allied, is refusal to believe in the face of overwhelming evidence.
  • Radical Ed Temlako... 2012/07/04 20:03:10
    Radical Ed
    what evidence?
  • Temlako... Radical Ed 2012/07/04 20:05:19
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    Well, I don't know where to begin! But just to take one recent point that punches a gaping hole in your paradigm:

    Your side always says that fossils are animals that laid down and died.

    Well, can you tell me why two turtles could get themselves fossilized *while in the throes of a sexual act*?

    If that does not bespeak sudden death, I'd like to know what does.

    And I say that *every* fossil results from sudden death.

    Only one thing can do that: a Flood.
  • Radical Ed Temlako... 2012/07/04 20:13:14
    Radical Ed
    +1
    You are presuming the noah flood. I would have to say that a flood could be possible but there are others. consider that there may have been an avalanche, burying the two turtles. volcanic eruption causing the release of ash and thus suffocating them to death. high volumes of carbon dioxide and monoxide could have also be the cause. this may be due to a sudden eruption releasing a gas pocket.
  • Temlako... Radical Ed 2012/07/04 20:15:53
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    But that's just one example. I've seen reports of one fish eating another, when...WHAM. Two dinosaurs locked in combat, when...WHAM. I could go on and on.
  • Radical Ed Temlako... 2012/07/04 20:18:17
    Radical Ed
    +1
    yup you could and they can all be explained multiple ways. their location, position, depth of discovery, what they were eating etc all factor into what happened to them when death occurred and the possible causes.
  • Temlako... Radical Ed 2012/07/04 20:20:41
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    Any ONE of them could. But ALL OF THEM AT ONCE? Not in a billion years. Which this earth didn't have.
  • Radical Ed Temlako... 2012/07/04 20:22:48
    Radical Ed
    All of what at once? I am talking about observations that can be made on the fossils and surround location to identify probable causes of death.
  • Temlako... Radical Ed 2012/07/04 20:33:41
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    All the fossil animals that had obvious signs of *sudden death.* Besides, you don't *get* fossilization in any context *except* that of sudden death.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/06/20 09:17:10

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals