SodaHead Celebrates Green Week

Submit News News

Court fines man for beheading wax Hitler

- A German court fined an unemployed man 900 euros ($1,227) Tuesday for knocking the head off a waxwork figure of Adolf Hitler in a Berlin museum.

Minutes after the Madame Tussauds museum opened in the German capital in July, the 42-year-old pushed past security staff ripped off its head. The man, an ex-policeman, said he found it inappropriate to display an exhibit showing the Nazi leader only some 500 meters from Berlin's Holocaust memorial.

The waxwork of a glum-looking Hitler in a mock bunker stirred debate in Germany even before it went on display. Critics argued it was tasteless to display a replica of the man who unleashed World War Two and ordered the extermination of Europe's Jews.

Madame Tussauds said the museum avoided politics, arguing Hitler stood for a significant part of German history and his waxwork therefore had a legitimate part in the exhibition.

The restored figure was returned to the museum in September and is now displayed behind a glass wall.... Read full article »
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Top Comment
  • +5 raves kahless May 13, 2009 15:58:07
    kahless
    those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it....show this monsters face to the world, and tell the story of what he and his murderers did......dont ever forget it.
    View thread
Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Comments
  • +1 raves
    Ptown27 brother... May 13, 2009 20:54:54
    Ptown27
    Considering a recent MSNBC poll showed a majority giving him a C,D, or F for his first 100 days, I'd have to disagree with you on the WHOLE world loving Obama.
  • brother... Ptown27 May 14, 2009 00:00:48
    brotherplease
    I love him!
  • Ptown27 brother... May 14, 2009 03:19:04
    Ptown27
    And you are certainly welcome to your opinion. YOU just harly make up the WHOLE world.
  • Teresa Canales May 13, 2009 16:33:04
    Teresa Canales
    I hope he stepped on it, too!

    I know Hitler was a significant part of Germany's history, but I can't blame him for getting angry at the sight of his ugly face.

    I mean, I thought it was awesome when here in the U.S., a Native American took a sledgehammer to a statue of Christopher Columbus.

    They just did what we all wish we could do.

    (sorry about the quality)
  • +1 raves
    Ptown27 Teresa ... May 13, 2009 16:36:59 (edited)
    Ptown27
    So you're a fan of crime, and vandalism??

    The guy was an idiot. What did Christopher Columbus have to do with Native Americans?
  • Teresa ... Ptown27 May 13, 2009 16:38:47
    Teresa Canales
    Well... if you want to put it in those words, I guess so.

    Do you not know U.S. history?
  • +1 raves
    Ptown27 Teresa ... May 13, 2009 16:44:18
    Ptown27
    Actually I think the better question would be "Do you?" Considering Columbus never set foot on American soil (United States, or North America) defacing a statue of him is idiotic at best.

    If he had done the same to a statue of George Washinton, Louis and Clark, or someone with an actual tie to the U.S. and possibly the fall of the American Indian culture I would be more sympathetic.
  • Teresa ... Ptown27 May 13, 2009 16:49:33
    Teresa Canales
    Then why do they teach us in school that he did? As for the defacing of the statue, I thought it was awesome.
  • Ptown27 Teresa ... May 13, 2009 16:53:04
    Ptown27
    He discovered the "Americas". He was the first to sail across the Atlantic Ocean. He landed on Cuba and the Dominican Republic on his firrst three trips, and then Venezuela on his forth and last trip.

    So when an MS13 gang member tags your house ,, that will be "awesome" as well?
  • Teresa ... Ptown27 May 13, 2009 16:54:51
    Teresa Canales
    I heard he landed in Florida.

    And I don't know who the MS13 is.
  • +2 raves
    Ptown27 Teresa ... May 13, 2009 16:59:06
    Ptown27
    First Expedition

    On Aug. 3, 1492, Columbus sailed from Palos, Spain, with three small ships, the Santa María, commanded by Columbus himself, the Pinta under Martín Pinzón, and the Niña under Vicente Yáñez Pinzón. After halting at the Canary Islands, he sailed due west from Sept. 6 until Oct. 7, when he changed his course to the southwest. On Oct. 10 a small mutiny was quelled, and on Oct. 12 he landed on a small island (Watling Island; see San Salvador) in the Bahamas. He took possession for Spain and, with impressed natives aboard, discovered other islands in the neighborhood. On Oct. 27 he sighted Cuba and on Dec. 5 reached Hispaniola.

    On Christmas Eve the Santa María was wrecked on the north coast of Hispaniola, and Columbus, leaving men there to found a colony, hurried back to Spain on the Niña. His reception was all he could wish; according to his contract with the Spanish sovereigns he was made “admiral of the ocean sea” and governor-general of all new lands he had discovered or should discover.

    Second Expedition

    Fitted out with a large fleet of 17 ships, with 1,500 colonists aboard, Columbus sailed from Cádiz in Oct., 1493. His landfall this time was made in the Lesser Antilles, and his new discoveries included the Leeward Islands and Puerto Rico. The admiral ar...







    First Expedition

    On Aug. 3, 1492, Columbus sailed from Palos, Spain, with three small ships, the Santa María, commanded by Columbus himself, the Pinta under Martín Pinzón, and the Niña under Vicente Yáñez Pinzón. After halting at the Canary Islands, he sailed due west from Sept. 6 until Oct. 7, when he changed his course to the southwest. On Oct. 10 a small mutiny was quelled, and on Oct. 12 he landed on a small island (Watling Island; see San Salvador) in the Bahamas. He took possession for Spain and, with impressed natives aboard, discovered other islands in the neighborhood. On Oct. 27 he sighted Cuba and on Dec. 5 reached Hispaniola.

    On Christmas Eve the Santa María was wrecked on the north coast of Hispaniola, and Columbus, leaving men there to found a colony, hurried back to Spain on the Niña. His reception was all he could wish; according to his contract with the Spanish sovereigns he was made “admiral of the ocean sea” and governor-general of all new lands he had discovered or should discover.

    Second Expedition

    Fitted out with a large fleet of 17 ships, with 1,500 colonists aboard, Columbus sailed from Cádiz in Oct., 1493. His landfall this time was made in the Lesser Antilles, and his new discoveries included the Leeward Islands and Puerto Rico. The admiral arrived at Hispaniola to find the first colony destroyed by the indigenous natives. He founded a new colony nearby, then sailed off in the summer of 1494 to explore the southern coast of Cuba. After discovering Jamaica he returned to Hispaniola and found the colonists, interested only in finding gold, completely disorderly; his attempts to enforce strict discipline led some to seize vessels and return to Spain to complain of his administration. Leaving his brother Bartholomew in charge at Hispaniola, Columbus also returned to Spain in 1496.

    Third Expedition

    On his third expedition, in 1498, Columbus was forced to transport convicts as colonists, because of the bad reports on conditions in Hispaniola and because the novelty of the New World was wearing off. He sailed still farther south and made his landfall on Trinidad. He sailed across the mouth of the Orinoco River (in present Venezuela) and realized that he saw a continent, but without further exploration he hurried back to Hispaniola to administer his colony. In 1500 an independent governor arrived, sent by Isabella and Ferdinand as the result of reports on the wretched conditions in the colony, and he sent Columbus back to Spain in chains. The admiral was immediately released, but his favor was on the wane; other navigators, including Amerigo Vespucci, had been in the New World and established much of the coast line of NE South America.

    Fourth Expedition

    It was 1502 before Columbus finally gathered together four ships for a fourth expedition, by which he hoped to reestablish his reputation. If he could sail past the islands and far enough west, he hoped he might still find lands answering to the description of Asia or Japan. He struck the coast of Honduras in Central America and coasted southward along an inhospitable shore, suffering terrible hardships, until he reached the Gulf of Darién. Attempting to return to Hispaniola, he was marooned on Jamaica. After his rescue, he was forced to abandon his hopes and return to Spain. Although his voyages were of great importance, Columbus died in relative neglect, having had to petition King Ferdinand in an attempt to secure his promised titles and wealth.
    (more)
  • Teresa ... Ptown27 May 13, 2009 17:05:16
    Teresa Canales
    Wow. I guess he didn't land in the U.S. However, he did discover the Americas where there were natives, correct? And didn't his "discovery" kinda lead into the rest? After he came here, everyone else did, too.
  • +1 raves
    Ptown27 Teresa ... May 13, 2009 17:13:51
    Ptown27
    American Indians were not simply placed here. Their ancestors walked from North Eastern Russia, into Alaska, and then migrated across the U.S. and into South America. They found their way here and eventually another more advanced civilization would have also.
  • Teresa ... Ptown27 May 13, 2009 17:18:35 (edited)
    Teresa Canales
    A theory. One of many.
  • Op4 Ptown27 May 14, 2009 22:17:40
    Op4
    Different is not necessarily the same as more advanced.
  • Ptown27 Op4 May 15, 2009 01:57:43
    Ptown27
    Not being a smart ass but be real. At the time Columbus sailed, the thought that the Earth was round was not a novel idea. How many civilizations in the world were more advanced than that of the Indians? French, English, Spanish, Persian, Chinese just to name a few. All of them had the capability to make extended ocean voyages. To believe that one of the many more advanced cultures/countries would not have eventually found its way to North America had Columbus not made his journey is simply naive.
  • Op4 Ptown27 May 15, 2009 02:58:35 (edited)
    Op4
    I wasn't debating that other cultures would find there way to North America. It's kind of hard to miss after all. Last time I saw anything on it, the Vikings made the earliest proven European sea cruise that made it here. Though I doubt they will ever get credited for that. What I was addressing was what's become the accepted Euro-centric definition of a "more advanced culture." I've always seen it as very limiting. Not to mention that mindset has led to wholesale killing of huge numbers of people throughout history. By the way, I did realize your actual point back there related to the 'land bridge' migration into North America and not the other stuff.

    For the record, I didn't take your answer as smart ass, but no worries on my end if it was. I'd rather deal with a thinking smart ass than a polite idiot any day.
  • Ptown27 Op4 May 15, 2009 03:19:35
    Ptown27
    I know many people consider the Euro-centric opinion of advanced culture offensive. That being said, all of the cultures I mentioned were much more advanced, technologically, and all were in the business of violent expansion, following the models laid out before them by the cultures they evolved from.

    My simple point is that IMHO, eventually another technologically advanced civilization would have likely found its way here, and by their past nature, clashed with the American Indians ending their culture as it was known.

    Honestly, I think the Chinese would have been the next to reach the Americas. Simply following the Asian coastline North until it curves westward would have put them in eyesight of the islands off the coast of Alaska.
  • Op4 Ptown27 May 15, 2009 09:04:45
    Op4
    I'll give you that the cultures you named were more advanced in the technological sense and driven to expand into new territories. Personally, I don't find the Euro-centric definition of an advanced culture offensive, just somewhat myopic. Prevailing wisdom defines advanced cultures primarily in terms of technology as you said. I question that definition because it leaves many other factors out. For example, some tribes were governed by democratic models of their own design, while the European's were ruled by monarchies. I would say a democratic model is the more advanced one, yet I could make a case the other way as well. It all depends on which filter I apply. That's why I try to view things like that as a matter of perspective more than anything else.

    As I said in my last post, I also agree that the "discovery" of the Americas was inevitable. However, I'm not sure if the results would have been the same if a non European culture had made it first. I think your idea is a really interesting one. If an Asian culture had discovered America first, it's possible that some racial commonalities might have been recognized and the meeting of the cultures might have been less disastrous. On the other hand, it might have been much worse for the same reasons. I'm going to have to play around with that when I get the time to research it a bit.
  • ♥~Rainb... Teresa ... May 14, 2009 08:47:16
    ♥~Rainbow~♥
    La Raza.... check it out
or
Cancel