Congressperson Sheila Jackson Lee wants hurricanes to have racially and culturally diverse names - Do you agree? If so, please supply a few names that could be used.
Wanda5245 - Citizen Activist Who Wants Spunkysmum Back On SH
2009/09/15 16:28:42
|
|
|||||
|
46 votes
|
|
21% | |||
|
84 votes
|
|
39% | |||
|
26 votes
|
|
12% | |||
|
61 votes
|
|
28% | |||
Since Congressperson Lee wants racially and culturally diverse names for hurricanes, we need to come up with some names to send to the powers that be who name the storms. Please supply a few names to add to the list.
------------------------
Excerpt from article:
However, the names all belonged to women — which, depending on your perspective, is either offensive to women or unfair to men, who deserve an equal shot at eponymous carnage. In 1979, the NHC split the names equally between the sexes.
The politics didn’t end there. Texas congresswoman Sheila Jackson-Lee complained in 2003 that storm names were too white. “All racial groups should be represented,” she said, and asked officials to “try to be inclusive of African-American names.” (One would expect Jackson-Lee to be pleased with naming conventions in other regions of the world. The central North Pacific will eventually experience storms named Keoni and Walaka; the Western north Pacific could be hit by Hurricane Fung-Wong.)
-----------------------------------------------
Full Article
What’s in a Hurricane Name?
by Brandon Keim
August 26, 2009 | 5:18 pm | Categories: Earth Science
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/08/hurricanename/
The Atlantic tropical storm season is in full swing, bringing destruction and unpredictability and scientific debate over whether storms are worse than they used to be. Given these more pressing concerns, you might think that naming storms would be the easy part. You’d be wrong.
According to the National Hurricane Center, “experience shows that the use of short, distinctive given names in written as well as spoken communications is quicker and less subject to error than the older more cumbersome latitude-longitude identification methods.” Seems simple enough, but it’s a bit too simple. As AccuWeather columnist Katrina Voss said several years ago, “Perhaps by naming … we are expressing our desire to control, or at best to understand, nature.”
Voss is onto something there. Maybe the need for control explains why, during the mid-20th century, people grew dissatisfied with how storms were given arbitrary names. Nature’s arbitrary enough as it is. So the NHC implemented the first modern naming system, using alphabetically ordered names for each successive storm.
However, the names all belonged to women — which, depending on your perspective, is either offensive to women or unfair to men, who deserve an equal shot at eponymous carnage. In 1979, the NHC split the names equally between the sexes.
The politics didn’t end there. Texas congresswoman Sheila Jackson-Lee complained in 2003 that storm names were too white. “All racial groups should be represented,” she said, and asked officials to “try to be inclusive of African-American names.” (One would expect Jackson-Lee to be pleased with naming conventions in other regions of the world. The central North Pacific will eventually experience storms named Keoni and Walaka; the Western north Pacific could be hit by Hurricane Fung-Wong.)
Other gripes have less to do with racial sensitivity than curmudgeonliness. “We are now naming things that I would not have named when I was the director even back in the ’70s and ’80s,” said Neil Frank, a former TV meteorologist, to a Miami station. Frank ostensibly left out how he used to walk 5 miles each way through the storms just to get to work.
For now, six lists of names are used in the Atlantic, one for each year in a six-year cycle, with the names of especially severe storms retired to ensure their place in history. This year has already seen storms named Ana, Bill and Claudette, with Danny and Erika after that on the horizon. If names run out in a given year, they are drawn from a non-alphabetical list of 24 Greek-letter names, which in New Testament fashion begins with Alpha and ends with Omega.
No contingency plan exists beyond Hurricane Omega. But if we ever need one, names will be the least of our problems.
Image: NOAA
------------------------
Excerpt from article:
However, the names all belonged to women — which, depending on your perspective, is either offensive to women or unfair to men, who deserve an equal shot at eponymous carnage. In 1979, the NHC split the names equally between the sexes.
The politics didn’t end there. Texas congresswoman Sheila Jackson-Lee complained in 2003 that storm names were too white. “All racial groups should be represented,” she said, and asked officials to “try to be inclusive of African-American names.” (One would expect Jackson-Lee to be pleased with naming conventions in other regions of the world. The central North Pacific will eventually experience storms named Keoni and Walaka; the Western north Pacific could be hit by Hurricane Fung-Wong.)
-----------------------------------------------
Full Article
What’s in a Hurricane Name?
by Brandon Keim
August 26, 2009 | 5:18 pm | Categories: Earth Science
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/08/hurricanename/
The Atlantic tropical storm season is in full swing, bringing destruction and unpredictability and scientific debate over whether storms are worse than they used to be. Given these more pressing concerns, you might think that naming storms would be the easy part. You’d be wrong.
According to the National Hurricane Center, “experience shows that the use of short, distinctive given names in written as well as spoken communications is quicker and less subject to error than the older more cumbersome latitude-longitude identification methods.” Seems simple enough, but it’s a bit too simple. As AccuWeather columnist Katrina Voss said several years ago, “Perhaps by naming … we are expressing our desire to control, or at best to understand, nature.”
Voss is onto something there. Maybe the need for control explains why, during the mid-20th century, people grew dissatisfied with how storms were given arbitrary names. Nature’s arbitrary enough as it is. So the NHC implemented the first modern naming system, using alphabetically ordered names for each successive storm.
However, the names all belonged to women — which, depending on your perspective, is either offensive to women or unfair to men, who deserve an equal shot at eponymous carnage. In 1979, the NHC split the names equally between the sexes.
The politics didn’t end there. Texas congresswoman Sheila Jackson-Lee complained in 2003 that storm names were too white. “All racial groups should be represented,” she said, and asked officials to “try to be inclusive of African-American names.” (One would expect Jackson-Lee to be pleased with naming conventions in other regions of the world. The central North Pacific will eventually experience storms named Keoni and Walaka; the Western north Pacific could be hit by Hurricane Fung-Wong.)
Other gripes have less to do with racial sensitivity than curmudgeonliness. “We are now naming things that I would not have named when I was the director even back in the ’70s and ’80s,” said Neil Frank, a former TV meteorologist, to a Miami station. Frank ostensibly left out how he used to walk 5 miles each way through the storms just to get to work.
For now, six lists of names are used in the Atlantic, one for each year in a six-year cycle, with the names of especially severe storms retired to ensure their place in history. This year has already seen storms named Ana, Bill and Claudette, with Danny and Erika after that on the horizon. If names run out in a given year, they are drawn from a non-alphabetical list of 24 Greek-letter names, which in New Testament fashion begins with Alpha and ends with Omega.
No contingency plan exists beyond Hurricane Omega. But if we ever need one, names will be the least of our problems.
Image: NOAA






















Yes, we have more pressing issues; but some members of Congress will do anything to avoid working on the real problems facing this country.
OK
Thank you
Second, how are we supposed to know which names are the diverse ones and which are not. Are they going to be labeled in ( ) after the name?
Sheila Jackson Lee is an idiot and needs to be voted out of office. Not that I am holding my breath on that happening since I understand that her district is gerrymandered to the max.
Hurricane names since early 1900s:
Ana Alex Arlene Alberto Allison* Arthur
Bill Bonnie Bret Beryl Barry Bertha
Claudette Charley Cindy Chris Chantal Cesar
Danny Danielle Dennis Debby Dean Dolly
Erika Earl Emily Ernesto Erin Edouard
Fabian Frances Floyd* Florence Felix Fran
Grace Georges* Gert Gordon Gabrielle Gustav
Henri Hermine Harvey Helene Humberto Horrtense
Isabel Ivan Irene Isaac Iris* Isidore
Juan Jeanne Jose Joyce Jerry Josephine
Kate Karl Katrina* Keith* Karen Kyle
Larry Lisa Lenny* Leslie Lorenzo Lili
Mindy Mitch* Maria Michael Michelle* Marco
Nicholas Nicole Nate Nadine Noel Nana
Odette Otto Ophelia Oscar Olga Omar
Peter Paula Phillippe Patty Pablo Paloma
Rose Richard Rita Rafael Rebekah Rene
Sam Shary Stan Sandy Sebastien Sally
Teresa Tomas Tammy Tony Tanya Teddy
Victor Virginie Vince Valerie Van Vicky
Wanda Walter Wilma William Wendy Wilfred
WTF is right, you have to be ROTFLYAO at her. She cannot be remotely serious can she? This is what she feels is important in this critical time. Furthermore if this is what she really feels is important.
Of course she also thinks Venezuela is friendly country, she also tried to get the house to pass a resolution honoring Micheal Jackson as a great humanitarian, oh yeah took a phone call during a health care debate meeting.
I wonder if her and Dennis Kuccinich will be traveling to area 51 soon to talk with aliens.
Most person's brains are in their heads, but her anal glands are definitely her way . . . what an unimpressive dolt, she must be bringing the old district a lot of porky pig home to fry up