City Planner Says Walking Is the Key to Saving Cities: Do You Enjoy Walking More Than Driving?
tentmaster
2012/12/20 19:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
178 votes
|
|
62% | |||
|
109 votes
|
|
38% | |||
Yes, we all enjoy driving around while listening to our favorite tunes, but has walking become a lost ritual?
GRIST.ORG reports:

GRIST.ORG reports:
Urban planner Jeff Speck's Theory of Walkability posits that cities designed for people, not cars, will be centers of growth in the 21st century.

Read More: http://grist.org/people/foot-forward-walkability-i...






















If you are late and sweaty due to running across town no one cares
how are huffy & puffing though your presentation because you're green.
In the future, this won't be a choice, if you haven't noticed the population is growing massively, in 50 years there will not be that many people living outside of cities, this means cities will need to be more efficient or people will be spending hours waiting in traffic lines just to go to the store. It's important for people to keep up with the times and realize it's not always going to be how it is now.
I don't see why anyone would be running and sweating going to work, I walk to uni everyday and I'm not sweating when I get there, I leave early to make sure I have plenty of time to get there without having to rush or risk being late.
Heard it 50 yrs ago and the projections were false then and they remain inaccurate now. The population fanatics claim 3% growth by extracting war deaths (unfortunately a fact of life), while the true growth is slightly above 1% and dropping rapidly.
http://www.census.gov/populat...
Sorry, but whenever central planners start claiming they have a better solution then you should gather your deeds, call a good lawyer, and watch your wallet. City Planners are only used by a community which has too much money or has a committee too stupid too their job. If your city/town hires one, vote your mayor/city counsel out of office.
Already, for the first time in our history, most of the population of the world lives in cities, all research shows this will continue to increase in the future. The rate of urban population growth is by around 60 million per year.
'City planners' might not be the solution but a solution has to be found for this unique future issue regardless, at least we need people thinking about solutions in case all the studies prove accurate.
We could leave it as it is, and then in 50 years have a very bitter population stuck in traffic living in inefficient spaces, having to leave hours early to get to work on time or walking miles to the store and gas prices being up the roof (As more consumption means eventually less resources, and high demand for a hard and expensive product to come by means higher prices) etc.
It might not effect us so terribly in our life time, but have to think of the future too. There's nothing terrible about trying to better our system as it is.
Yes, the small farm community is dying, but that is due to more efficient and productive agricultural techniques and spreading communities offering more profit for the land than farmer can earn in a decade. Not using available land is ridiculous and moving everyone into a confined area is an excellent means to initiate and spread a plague. BTW, non-urban areas did grow modestly from 2000 to 2010.
But that's okay, you must have the right idea if the UN is also behind it. Do you think the UN was talking about the U.S. with a nationwide road system or some place like third-world nations?
A woman asks her husband for the car keys because she has to go to the store.
"Hey, why don't you just walk to the store? The weather is great!"
"Yes I know, but I don't want to breathe in all the exhaust fumes..."
or
hehehe... back in the day, there was no such thing as bicycle helmets for kids!