Quantcast

Can We Love Multiple People At One Time?

With Tiger Wood's infidelities being front page news for the past week, infidelity itself has become something of a hot topic. Why do so many men and women insist on cheating on the people they have committed themselves to? Is it because monogamy is a crazy, unattainable goal?

Polyamory, the practice of engaging in multiple romantic relationships at the same time, is regarded by its practitioners as being more natural than monogamy, or to use an equivalent term 'monoamory'. Polyamorous people believe that it is possible, and indeed, natural, to love multiple people at the same time.

Polyamory should not be confused with swinging, in which couples interact sexually with people outside of the relationship without having a romantic attachment to them, nor should it be confused with infidelity in which people lie to their spouses and break the terms of their romantic arrangement in which they agreed to forsake all others, or at least not mess with their genitals.

Polyamory is best defined as a relationship in which both partners agree to some degree of openness. Some practitioners have a very open relationship in which both partners are free to love whoever they want, however it is more common for polyamorous couples to take a more cautious approach and seek a third partner, or perhaps a fourth, and then keep the relationship closed to that circle of people. This allows them to enjoy romantic relationships with more than one person without being exposed to every single sexually transmitted infection that mutates out of the disease pool.

Whilst polyamory is an interesting concept, and no doubt works for some people. (The creator of Wonder Woman lived in a polyamorous relationship with two women, who continued to live together after his death,) it's not for everyone and it's not a solution to infidelity. Why? Because if anything, polyamory requires being more trustworthy and more honest with your partners that monoamory does. When you're in a traditional relationship, the rules are simple. You don't go outside the relationship, if you do, you are a lying little cheat. When you're in a more open relationship, then you have to be able to trust that your partner is acting within the bounds you set up whilst he or she is out and about spreading his or her love around. For this reason, most open relationships have plenty of rules and safeguards set in place to try and keep the people in them safe. You may be able to pursue romantic interests outside of your primary relationship, but that doesn't mean you can have any cocktail waitress you take a fancy to.

Polyamory is an interesting approach to the problem of human sexuality, after all, it seems very strange that we accept that parents can love more than one child, or that we can feel affection for more than one friend, but we then fairly arbitrarily decide that we can only truly feel romantic love for one person. It seems to make sense that we should be more open in our romantic relationships, after all, it would save us the pain and heartache of being cheated on, right?

Maybe. Even dedicated polyamorous people sometimes become jealous seeing their partners fall in love with other people, and there are other drawbacks too, pregnancy, increased exposure to STI's, greater potential for being cheated on, (if people cheat when they're in traditional couples, mathematically, its highly likely that they will cheat when they are in triads or foursomes or quintets.) For every polyamory success story, there are plenty more that end badly. Someone lies, someone cheats, someone has their heart broken, and worst case scenario, someone ends up with a life long disease.

Ironically, it would seem that polyamory is best conducted by the sort of people who would be highly successful in monogamous relationships. That's bad news for the serial cheater.

Polyamory may be something akin to communism. In other words, it's an excellent idea in theory, but more often than not, a train wreck in practice.
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Rob December 15, 2009 23:57:17
    Rob
    +5
    THE ROMANS TRIED IT - THE EMPIRE COLLAPSED

    BY THE WAY - ASK YOUR HUSBAND WANTS TO SHARE YOU.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • GOODBYE SODAHEAD December 20, 2009 04:25:26
    GOODBYE SODAHEAD
    +1
    Bigamy = Having one wife too many.

    Monogamy = Having one wife too many.
  • pmurph364 December 17, 2009 06:40:07
    pmurph364
    Sounds close to pimp /ho lifestyle .
  • cestmonopinion December 17, 2009 01:39:33
    cestmonopinion
    Obviously, yes. But can you love them the same? No. Polyamory would not work for me, I'm too jealous and I'm a one-d*k-at-a-time type of gal. I can't imagine being as emotionally close and physically close like I am with my beloved and like two other dudes. It probably works better for dudes who are naturally more polygamous and less emotionally involved.
  • Tabby cestmon... November 18, 2010 15:46:03
    Tabby
    One can argue that you can never love anyone the same.
  • Joe December 17, 2009 00:45:24 (edited)
    Joe
    +1
    (Disclaimer: I am in a committed monogamous relationship.)
    The Roman Empire didn't collapse due to a lack of enforced monogamy.
    Tiger Woods is not an example of failed polyamory. He is an example of failed extramarital affairs, and perhaps sexual addiction, if the number of mistresses coming out in the news is to be believed.
    Adding a poly third (or more) to an existing couple is not about getting some on the side and is not about threesomes. The partner is aware of becoming a triad or a quad. If you, as a partner, can't imagine sharing your spouse, then the lifestyle will not work for you. And that kind of possessiveness is likely already causing problems.
    The pairings in the poly relationships are not specifically sexual. It's about time during the holidays, going to the movies, taking a nice vacation, painting the kitchen walls, and mowing the lawn, just not always with just one person.
  • giermarb December 17, 2009 00:01:15
    giermarb
    When you use the word "can", I interpret that to mean "capable". And I say yes, we are capable of loving more than one person at a time. We do it often. We love our mothers, our fathers, our sons and daughters, as well as our wives or husbands. But we can legally only have sex with the latter two, and perhaps a non-family lover, depending upon the law of one's locality. While in the military for twenty years, I have known a number of men who loved their girlfriends overseas, but still loved and returned to their wives back home. But not always. Sometimes they elected to divorce their wives and marry the girlfriends. I suspect that it was based upon who could give them the most satisfaction in a sexual way. If momma didn't do what he needed to produce a good orgasim, he switched to the one of did. (Just my assumption)
  • giermarb giermarb December 17, 2009 00:30:53
    giermarb
    Also, it was often said that the Roman Empire fell due to immorality. Not so. The Western half fell in 476 due to constant wars with various tribes long after Constantine and most of officials had accepted and enforced Christianity. So, if there were any immorality going on, we know who was doing it. The Eastern half at Constantinople did not fall until Rome was well into Christianity, in 1453, as a result of being defeated by
    forces of Islam; thus, depriving Christianity of control of most of the then known world. Actually, Rome reached the height of her majesty and power under paganism, but fell under Christianity. (See: any World Almanac, or "World History" by National Geographic.
  • ~Pro-Fetus Anti-Liberal Ant... December 16, 2009 21:52:30
    ~Pro-Fetus Anti-Liberal Anti-Atheist~
    I don't know and don't care. If you can't be monogamous, don't get into a 'committed' relationship, only to let the other person down. It's not fair to them, for you to waste their time. BTW, I'm impressed Hope Alexander. Your last two blogs have not been half bad in my book. :)
  • giermarb ~Pro-Fe... December 17, 2009 00:34:22
    giermarb
    But some people don't know that they cannot be monomgamous and have good intentions, until they get married and find out that their mate is impotent, homosexual, lacking a libido, or were brainwashed into believing that sex is dirty, sinful, apt to cause disease, etc..
  • ~Pro-Fe... giermarb December 17, 2009 06:15:28
    ~Pro-Fetus Anti-Liberal Anti-Atheist~
    Then they should discuss all of the above before hand. What, do you know people who just meet and get married,without getting to know the other person first? That's not very responsible and it's a bad choice that they have to live with for being impulsive.
  • Anita Wagner December 16, 2009 19:58:46 (edited)
    Anita Wagner
    +3
    Some here have spoken quite knowledgeably about polyamory, and some - well, rather a lot actually - have spoken about it who clearly don't know what they are talking about, only what they imagine. Just because you can't imagine how it can work doesn't mean that it *doesn't* work.

    I've been practicing polyamory myself now for 13 years, teach classes on how to establish and conduct successful polyamorous relationships, and its practice has been growing at a fairly fast pace. It's not for everyone. It takes a lot of honesty, trustworthiness, intentionality, self-awareness, emotional intelligence, forgiveness, compassion, communication, and love. A non-possessive attitude toward one's partners is also important, regardless that our society reinforces possessiveness as an appropriate way to view monogamous relationships

    One reason many people believe it isn't possible to love more than one person openly and honestly is because we've all been marinated in a societal belief system that is founded on a fairy-tale that says that there is only one person out there for us who will love only us and with whom we will live happily ever after. Clearly it doesn't work out quite as well as all that for many, and a lot of people have become disillusioned with it. More and more are choosing ...
    Some here have spoken quite knowledgeably about polyamory, and some - well, rather a lot actually - have spoken about it who clearly don't know what they are talking about, only what they imagine. Just because you can't imagine how it can work doesn't mean that it *doesn't* work.

    I've been practicing polyamory myself now for 13 years, teach classes on how to establish and conduct successful polyamorous relationships, and its practice has been growing at a fairly fast pace. It's not for everyone. It takes a lot of honesty, trustworthiness, intentionality, self-awareness, emotional intelligence, forgiveness, compassion, communication, and love. A non-possessive attitude toward one's partners is also important, regardless that our society reinforces possessiveness as an appropriate way to view monogamous relationships

    One reason many people believe it isn't possible to love more than one person openly and honestly is because we've all been marinated in a societal belief system that is founded on a fairy-tale that says that there is only one person out there for us who will love only us and with whom we will live happily ever after. Clearly it doesn't work out quite as well as all that for many, and a lot of people have become disillusioned with it. More and more are choosing polyamory instead in the belief that FOR THEM it is more realistic, more honest, and less conducive toward cheating. Despite what another commenter here said, polyamorists don't cheat on their partners nearly at the same rate as monogamists do - they don't have to. This is not to say that it never happens, but it's pretty rare and tends to happen with people who don't have enough integrity and skill to be honest to the degree necessary. Some even enjoy the thrill of a clandestined affair, but those who get a charge out of cheating aren't at all cut out for success at polyamory.

    Another correction, the most common form of polyamory is the open diad, i.e. where a primary couple agrees to the mutual option to also see other people - *not* polyfidelity, as some call it, where a group commits to each other and doesn't get involved with anyone else.

    The biggest myth of all is that polyamory is more about sex than anything else. This is simply not true. Polyamorists love and are committed to their partners. They value their relationships with their partners just as much as monogamous people do.

    Interestingly, the idea of polyamory pushes a lot of people's buttons, and some tend to villify polyamorists in response to the perceived threat they feel. In reality, I'll take the honest integrity and transparency of polyamory any day over a taken-for-granted, reflexive traditional monogamous relationship. I see it as a setup that is condusive to cheating. It leaves people no room to renegotiate their relationship when over time something is found to be missing. Instead serial monogamy becomes the pattern, with the significant risk of eventual heartbreak at having to split up and start over - again.

    Lastly - there is absolutely nothing wrong with choosing monogamy. It's a fine choice and works quite well for many people. The important thing is that it be an intentional choice and fully-aware commitment between partners that also allows for reassessment and values reaffirmation. Choosing monogamy reflexively because it's what everyone does, and believing that marriage is a guarantee of some kind becomes a sad dissapointment for those who don't make their decisions with more awareness. I know, I've been there myself, but I learned my lessons, and one thing I know for sure is that I'm never going back again.

    Anita Wagner
    http://www.practicalpolyamory...
    (more)
  • giermarb Anita W... December 17, 2009 00:41:28
    giermarb
    Indeed. The Travel Channel often shows documentaries of various tribes in Africa, the Pacific, S. America, etc. They had on what I believe is called "The Canola Tribe" (I am not sure of that spelling), where the women were allowed to have more than one husband, and would choose their own extra mates during community dances, where they all danced naked or quite close thereto. They have been living like that for unknown hundreds or thousands of years, and it seems to cause no problems. Most of the men had no problems with it, but now and then some did. I believe you can buy the disk at their website on the net.
  • Puzzle0807 December 16, 2009 17:08:46
    Puzzle0807
    +1
    Polyamory in practice requires a level of self-esteem, responsibility and rational thought that is simply not usually mandated in monogamy. Loving is easy, we do it without thinking about it. We love our kids, our pets, our friends, our jobs, our hobbies, our partners and our family without trying. Its not the ability to love in question, its the ability to move past how a situation makes us feel and get into understanding where those feelings come from and how to solve the real issues involved.

    Without the false security of monogamy's promise that the person you love needs and desires nothing more than what they have with you, people have to face the fears of investing in other people. Jealousy is fear morphed into something you can blame on someone else. Fear as it presents as jealousy, envy, anger, etc belongs only to one person- you. You have to deal with how you feel and decide for yourself what agreements and situations you are willing to invest in. Those emotions arent your partners or even their fault, so you cant blame your partner, you have to face it in yourself.

    This is why poly isnt for everyone. You have to be introspective, patient and truly be your own person. You cant give into every emotional whim and take it all back later. You cant resritct your partner...
    Polyamory in practice requires a level of self-esteem, responsibility and rational thought that is simply not usually mandated in monogamy. Loving is easy, we do it without thinking about it. We love our kids, our pets, our friends, our jobs, our hobbies, our partners and our family without trying. Its not the ability to love in question, its the ability to move past how a situation makes us feel and get into understanding where those feelings come from and how to solve the real issues involved.

    Without the false security of monogamy's promise that the person you love needs and desires nothing more than what they have with you, people have to face the fears of investing in other people. Jealousy is fear morphed into something you can blame on someone else. Fear as it presents as jealousy, envy, anger, etc belongs only to one person- you. You have to deal with how you feel and decide for yourself what agreements and situations you are willing to invest in. Those emotions arent your partners or even their fault, so you cant blame your partner, you have to face it in yourself.

    This is why poly isnt for everyone. You have to be introspective, patient and truly be your own person. You cant give into every emotional whim and take it all back later. You cant resritct your partner or their interactions based on your own fears. Personally, I find rules like 'veto' and restrictions on when and how your partner can interact to be bullshit hold overs from the false security of monogamy. If someone is going to 'cheat' then they are going to 'cheat' regardless of your usually unspoken or assumed expectation. What I know is that my relationships are based on agreement and not expectations. My partners can't cheat, because there is no cheating, there is holding up an agreement or breaking it, but neither of these things is a direct reflection on me as a person. If my partner breaks an agreement then its time to look at my investment, both in that agreement and in that person and make sure that both things are still something I want.
    (more)
  • heavenfirechris December 16, 2009 14:11:14
    heavenfirechris
    If you're talking about human love ... ask your wife/ husband! But if we instead consider 'agape' love (God's love), then yes we can and should love more. By the way, who's poly, and is she really that amorous?
  • Silas December 16, 2009 14:02:09
    Silas
    Interesting, but human social dynamics are tricky and often messy (if not violent). At best we manage a fair amount of stable monogamy. I seriously don't know how this can work in our current society. People get possessive and needy. They want attention and often times are not willing to share that attention. No matter how 'open' we are sometimes violent actions ensues. I'm especially skeptical of a man with many wives who in turn breed droves of children. Something seems oppressive about that situation too. It all tends towards a messy combustible combination.
  • cestmon... Silas December 17, 2009 01:46:20
    cestmonopinion
    There's something oppressive about it alright. It's steeped is misogyny and pedophilia. Most of that polygamy crap involves taking really young girls as wives.
  • bizutage01 December 16, 2009 13:59:57
    bizutage01
    I tried that in a rather distant past, interesting, to put it mildly, doesn't last, or didn't in my case.
  • ladypuppylove December 16, 2009 13:58:59
    ladypuppylove
    +1
    their are difference kinds of love like the love for your parents , and love for your childrens , also love for your sisters and brothers, also love for your better half , but to me myself tiger wood was on a lust hunt he did not love anyone but himself look at all the women he has hurt
  • 1234 (sucka) December 16, 2009 09:26:03
    1234 (sucka)
    ya if that's what someone is into I don't think we have the right to stop them
  • Surgeon ~The Misanthrope~ December 16, 2009 09:04:56
    Surgeon ~The Misanthrope~
    Love takes time to form. With children, parental love stems from protection. With friends, well, you still hide things from them.
    But with someone you really love, you're totally honest with them. I think it's selfish to want more than one like that.

    If you love one then claim to love another then I don't believe that's love.
    That's just you wanting to get lucky.

    I loved some deeply once...
    The mere thought of them with anyone else made me want to resort to "Yandere-mode" and kill them both.

    Sex isn't the same as love.
    You can not love and have sex.
    You can love and not have sex.
    You can love and have sex.
    You can not love and not have sex.

    If I had to share the one I loved... it'd be like the genderbent version of "School Days" and I'd be Katsura.

About Me

Hope Alexander

Hope Alexander

New Zealand

October 24, 2009 00:25:42

is.

View complete profile

The Latest From SodaHead

Living

Food