Can a woman be femist and sexually obsessed ?

by xcheshirecat Posted 2011/01/31 01:23:02

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	32 votes	84%
	No	4 votes	11%
	Another	2 votes	5%

More polls by xcheshirecat

Devil's Advocate 2012/08/19 17:22:42

Yes

Being a feminist doesnt interfere with your bodys natural processes

reply
Bob, the reasonable one 2012/08/19 05:10:51

Yes

hell yea....it's only the extremist whacko element of feminism that connect the hatred of hetero sex as rape...those people are loony tunes...generally these women are the type that no one wants to have sex with anyway....really fat ugly women should not be passing any of their ideas to anybody at any time...

reply
InoYamanaka 2012/08/19 04:33:30

Another

I wouldn't know. (here to observe the other answers).

reply
poet4justice 2012/08/19 04:27:05

Yes

+1
they are human not machine

reply
James 2012/07/21 02:57:54

No

I'm sure there are plenty of heterosexual women who support women's issues but have no problems confessing they want the sausage every once in a while.

reply
C-ZAR™, Emperor of the PHÆT 2012/07/20 23:37:22

Yes

I think so

reply
john 2012/07/20 18:26:26

Yes

we are all human....

reply
Speedy 2012/07/20 18:00:49

Yes

Absolutely yes!

reply
wgossett99 2012/02/07 21:35:03

Yes

Feminism is about rights to equal pay, fair treatment legally and similar stuff.

Sexual obsession is about sex. I have known a woman who was an ardent feminist (back in the 70s) who had a sex drive that was amazing. She had sex with many, many guys including me. She loved sex in about any form and was very active with NOW.

So, yes, a woman can be both.

reply
Jezebel 2011/03/22 17:30:25
Linsey(: 2011/01/31 20:05:12 (edited)

Yes

+1
i think shawna summed it up nicely.
EDIT: fixed a typo

reply
Blueskies 2011/01/31 16:52:25 (edited)

Yes

+1
Why not?

I think sex is great.

And exactly what is a feminist?

A lesbian and / or female supremicist steeped in individualistic philosophy where everything is a fierce competition, and all relationships are power based and hierarchal? Yeah, they might not be into normal sex.

Or a normal educated woman who wants to vote and be legally free to manage her own affairs, but still get married, have a husband, or at least a boyfriend, have children and a family life, and possibly a career or job on the side.? A first class citizen as men are.

reply
xcheshi... to Blueskies 2011/01/31 19:19:24

the person was talking about me being extreme feminist (cause few people called me that when I said : I pay pill, he should provide condoms) so, that for them I have a problem with man

She never was able to tell me how a lesbian need to like men to love sex lolll

reply
Blueskies to xcheshi... 2011/02/01 16:20:32

It would NEVER occur to me to expect the lady I was about to bed kept a supply of condoms for my use, "just in case". If it was any sort of issue, I would buy them- it's a product for men for durn sake no woman ever expected me to buy her tampons for her, though..
I would br expecting her to be useing the pill though

reply
xcheshi... to Blueskies 2011/02/01 20:41:54

yep, exactly.

Protection is 50% for each, pills and condoms both counts. And men can't have pill yet.
if men would have pills, it would not be for them only to buy condoms though

reply
danielria 2011/01/31 14:33:18

Yes

+2
The two a different issues. A feminist could demand not to be looked at as a slut just because she likes sex. Men are looked at differently for being sexually active with multiple partners. Why are women sluts? Why are men considered players? A feminist would more than likely demand equal treatment for sexuality. Men should not be looked at any different than a woman. That would be what a feminist would demand. The truth is that men and women both like sex. It should be equal for both species.

reply
Arya 2011/01/31 12:59:13

Yes

+2
Sure, one has nothing to do with the other.

reply
Lady Whitewolf 2011/01/31 11:57:44

Yes

+1
I second Shawna....

reply
MissJo 2011/01/31 06:41:19

Yes

+1
You do realize that women have sexual urges too, you know?
-_-

reply
xcheshi... to MissJo 2011/01/31 12:11:39

have you read the description. It's someone else who is telling me they can't be, I don't believe it

reply
Zolfie™ 2011/01/31 04:59:17

Yes

+2
Yes a woman can be both. Feminism just wants equal and/or better rights for Females than Males. I'm sure that including the rights to choose when, how and how often they have naughty fun. As long as it's consenting adults I believe both males and females have those rights in the US.

reply
xcheshi... to Zolfie™ 2011/01/31 12:12:23

it wasn't about rights, but the girl told me it was something opposed. Like communism and capitalism

reply
Shawna 2011/01/31 03:57:05

Yes

+6
feminism is not supposed to be equal to man hating. It is supposed to be about gaining equal rights for women but some feminists have definitely taken a wrong turn. That is why I prefer to call myself a humanist. A humanist wants equal rights for everybody. It includes feminism but it does not exclude anyone with a penis.

reply
xcheshi... to Shawna 2011/01/31 04:00:26

+1
yeah, but they use it as a prejovative word... Few people though I was an extreme feminist cause I want the guy to pay condoms since I pay pills

reply
Shawna to xcheshi... 2011/01/31 04:02:24

+1
Yes, people do use it as pejorative which is another reason why I call myself a humanist instead. It reduces chance that someone will misunderstand me. I agree with you about the birth control. Birth control is a shared responsibility.

reply
xcheshi... to Shawna 2011/01/31 04:04:00

+1
I don't label myself actually, but they had labelled me. I don't think I am a feminist, since I don't fight as a woman first, but as human

reply
Shawna to xcheshi... 2011/01/31 04:11:11 (edited)

+1
You are a humanist :) Personally I don't understand how anyone can fail to be. It should be automatic. But then, I wish we didn't have wars and famine too. Silly me.

reply
xcheshi... to Shawna 2011/01/31 04:15:01

+1
same here :)

reply
Zolfie™ to Shawna 2011/01/31 05:13:23

+2
Thanks for not excluding me :)
*hugs* :)

reply
Shawna to Zolfie™ 2011/01/31 05:14:35

+2
Thanks for the hug. I need it!

reply
Zolfie™ to Shawna 2011/01/31 05:26:55

+2
Of course :)

reply
Lady Wh... to Shawna 2011/01/31 11:57:24

+2
good for you!

reply
Son of Furious 2011/01/31 03:38:45

Yes

+2
I've heard of some cases where women would lure men in, abuse them and then kill them. Granted the women I'm thinking of were psychpaths but based on some of their behavior I'd say they considered themselves femminist.

reply
Shawna to Son of ... 2011/01/31 04:03:26

+1
WOW-that' awfully extreme. I have to say the label psychopath might make the label feminist redundant.

reply
Son of ... to Shawna 2011/01/31 04:09:46

+2
No the cases in particular I have in mind really were psychopaths. For example one of them slept with her own son and had him kill his stepdad. The other would lure physically limited men, sleep with them, accuse them of being pedophiles and then kill them. You can be femminist and not psychotic. But these women considered themselves "independent." Its just an observation.

reply
Shawna to Son of ... 2011/01/31 04:12:15

+2
That is what I said. The really were psychopaths. Anyhow......what gruesome stories!

reply
Son of ... to Shawna 2011/01/31 04:15:19

+2
Oh sorry, I must have misread your previous comment. Those two stories in particular really bother me.

reply
Shawna to Son of ... 2011/01/31 04:18:56

+2
YES-very nasty. Fortunately, not common.

reply
Son of ... to Shawna 2011/01/31 04:20:38

+2
Yeah, its probably a good thing I'm not pursuing a career in criminal justice. I'd probably be miserable all the time.

reply
Shawna to Son of ... 2011/01/31 04:22:50

+2
That's true. Do something happy and then spread your joy :)

reply