Quantcast

California Legislators Approve Robot Cars on Public Roads: Do You?

Fef 2012/08/31 18:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Ready to share the road with robots weighing 4,000 pounds of metal moving at speeds up to 65 MPH? California legislators voted to approve California Senate Bill 1298 (SB 1298) that “would permit autonomous vehicles to be operated or tested on the public roads in this state.” The senate bill also added that the robot cars will “offer significant potential safety, mobility, and commercial benefits for individuals and businesses in the state and elsewhere.”

It doesn't surprise me that the state legislator in California, where Google flexes its political power, would allow the bill. It also doesn't surprise me that the state senate already wrote nearly 1,300 new laws. I actually look forward to less California humans driving on the road, particularly in Los Angeles. However, we need to verify that these robots won't suffer road rage and go all "Terminator" on us.

ARSTECHNICA.COM reports:
Legislators pass new law that would set safety and performance standards.
arstechnica reports legislators pass law safety performance standards

Read More: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/08/robot-c...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • sglmom 2012/08/31 02:24:45
    Yes
    sglmom
    +11
    As someone who is BLIND
    I truly am encouraged that these Self-Driving vehicles are going into real life applications ..
    This is going to be ..
    if the costs are brought down to where it is affordable ..
    a BIG BOON in securing independence ..
    the ability to be FREE to move around so much more ..
    for those with Disabilities
    (and definitely for the Vision Impaired/Blind ... especially me!)

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Dave 007 2012/11/17 14:57:47
    No
    Dave 007
    And how much will this cost?
  • Tomboy110 2012/10/04 05:41:54 (edited)
    Yes
    Tomboy110
    Finally they make cars for driving not for racing. I mean someone tell me do they ever see a speed limit that ever reaches to at least over 65mph let alone 250 mph. Whats the point of making them that fast if we are never gonna get to drive that fast! AND its robotic.... COME ON PEOPLE!!!!!
  • TexasMentor54 2012/09/06 06:15:25
    Yes
    TexasMentor54
    The robots would not be stupid enough to try to text or yak or their phones while they are drivng. Bring 'em on!
  • Kenneth Huang 2012/09/06 01:33:01
    Yes
    Kenneth Huang
    +1
    Self-driving cars are the future. Think about how great self-driving cars would be for drivers who are fatigued, intoxicated or otherwise incompetent.

    I'm not sure why anyone would worry about "Terminator" cars. Do you ever worry about your toaster firing hot bread at you or your refrigerator crushing you?
  • Pyro-82 2012/09/05 23:49:22
    Yes
    Pyro-82
    I tuned in when they first started testing these things a few years back and was amazed, as long as they don't go terminator then I am all game for it.
  • SuperTrooper 2012/09/05 21:35:51
    No
    SuperTrooper
    Mmm not yet
  • Ron Hanforth 2012/09/05 18:55:02
    Yes
    Ron Hanforth
    less morons, more robots
  • Ted 2012/09/05 16:46:32
    Yes
    Ted
    With all the texting people are doing while driving, PLEASE bring the robot cars! The less morons we have behind the wheel the better.
  • P. Sturm 2012/09/05 11:13:19
    Yes
    P. Sturm
    It's got to be an improvement over the texting morons in the fast lane now!
  • Dr_Stoppit 2012/09/05 09:23:28
    No
    Dr_Stoppit
    People keep saying they couldn't be any worse than many human drivers, but I wouldn't be too sure about that. It sounds a bit Westworld to me. They'll cost a fortune to buy and even more to fix them when glitches inevitably occur. I'd like to know how the police can pull them over too.
  • Playerazzi 2012/09/05 08:08:22
    No
    Playerazzi
    ...even so-called autonomous subway trains have at least one driver.

    You never know what could happen, and robots are only as good as the software programmed into them.

    .. although these cars might come in handy where I live (Israel), as our drivers are notoriously horrible. Los Angelinos are angels in comparison.
  • rph3636 2012/09/05 07:23:36
    No
    rph3636
    +1
    Just another accident waiting to happen when some electrical problem arises. But then I don't approve of a whole lot of the robots that have drivers License and are driving around on the highways and seem to think they're human either, as their mouth never closes and they never have more then one hand on the steering wheel as their other has a cell phone in it.
  • silentart 2012/09/05 06:51:17
    No
    silentart
    +1
    Knowing malfunction with computer and hackers and virus. Why should I put my life in automated car? And more I am still old fashoined guy who like to drive by myself.
  • Dr_Stoppit silentart 2012/09/05 09:16:18 (edited)
    Dr_Stoppit
    I'm with you. I saw a 3-car pile-up at traffic lights last weekend. It happened at very low speed but I was still amazed at the busted plastic bumpers on modern cars. It made me glad I still drive a 1973 Chrysler. If someone chatting on a cell phone came up behind me at traffic lights and belted me like that, it wouldn't even scratch the Valiant.
  • Kozmo 2012/09/05 05:46:37
    Yes
    Kozmo
    Most city driving I've seen is a great lesson in bad psychology, it's a slam-dunk that EGO's make lousy drivers. Just be sure to use redundancy for navigation; put transponders on light poles, use the cell networks for navigation as well as GPS, Galileo etc, so if a Solar Flare hits a system or two could limp along until repairs are made.
  • Skar 2012/09/05 04:12:41
    Yes
    Skar
    I can't wait to get one of my own.
  • zigzag 2012/09/05 04:02:15
    Yes
    zigzag
    +1
    robots dont make mistakes like humans, people could travel faster and safer, this will be implemented in the future 100%
  • Faith 2012/09/05 03:09:38
    Yes
    Faith
    +1
    As long as they work properly....
  • rph3636 Faith 2012/09/05 07:27:01
    rph3636
    +1
    The key word "Work Properly".
  • oldhenry 2012/09/05 02:44:02 (edited)
    No
    oldhenry
    There's a huge difference between automated railroads and airliners which operate in a controlled environment where conflicts of movements are controlled and avoided, and allowing automated vehicles on public streets & freeways, especially if there's no licensed driver in the drivers seat to immediately take over in case of computer system failure. Knowing how automated systems fail, often without warning, whether a computer in a home or office or the ones in vehicles, aircraft and vessels, it's quite dangerous. Not to mention how accidents, moving violations, parking, etc. would be handled.
  • rph3636 oldhenry 2012/09/05 07:31:07
    rph3636
    Like a privately owned locomotive in a plant that was being controled by someone not on the locomotive and it ran wild through the plant, don't remember the damage, but am sure it was a fair amount and I'll just bet that right after that there was an engineer on the machine from then on.
  • El Prez 2012/09/05 01:46:33
    No
    El Prez
    It's bad enough when the idiots are IN the cars. Robots are not practicle.
  • WBC_Sux El Prez 2012/09/05 01:54:43
    WBC_Sux
    Practical. Not practicle.
  • El Prez WBC_Sux 2012/09/05 02:01:32
    El Prez
    Thank you, just in too much of a hurry!!!~
  • Kenneth... El Prez 2012/09/06 01:30:57
    Kenneth Huang
    We have robots doing all the work that factory workers used to do... how are they not practical?
  • El Prez Kenneth... 2012/09/06 05:29:35
    El Prez
    On the road! Do you want to drive with them?
  • Kenneth... El Prez 2012/09/08 18:26:58
    Kenneth Huang
    Sure, they'll probably be better drivers than actual humans.

    And robot workers make all the products we use on a daily basis - how do you know they're not defective? In fact, robots probably made the cars you and I drive every day - are you ever worried that one of the wheels will suddenly come off because of shoddy robot workmanship?
  • El Prez Kenneth... 2012/09/08 23:48:55
    El Prez
    Good I hope your robot is an excellent driver. Just watch out for this human who will continue to do his own driving.
  • nicesteve 2012/09/05 01:38:10 (edited)
    Yes
    nicesteve
    +1
    If it will enhance safety and increase traffic efficiency, then I'm all for it. This is
    especially true regarding young drivers and senior citizen drivers. My chief concern
    here is the substantial cost for both the new cars and the road infrastructure that will
    be neccessary in order th accomplish this. Again, the cost will be very significant here.
    I am definenately not swimming in wealth. I would defiinenately would need assistance
    in making the transition to an automated automobile.
  • Kozmo nicesteve 2012/09/05 05:53:35
    Kozmo
    +1
    Why not use the cell phone networks for navigation and put transponders on light poles near intersections to manage those. Use GPS, Galileo & other space navigation as well so no single system is too heavily loaded so if a solar flare or glitch hits, the systems not totally crippled. Safer to be de-centralized (à la Bitorrent) with many smaller dedicated powerplants (teid with rapid transit?) rather than have an Achilles Heel?
  • nicesteve Kozmo 2012/09/13 06:48:36
    nicesteve
    +1
    You might have a point there. Divide and conquer. Depending on a few infrastructures
    simountainously, just might be the key. That way you always have a plan B in case one of
    the infrastructures suddenly goes kaput. You still have a fighting chance.
  • Kozmo nicesteve 2012/09/13 07:19:01
    Kozmo
    An Achilles' Heel if you over-centralize any system. Employ BORG redundancy. If all are used below capacity, when one fails the rest can pick up the slack with ease, don't be too cheap, example of getting your money's worth, compare to the cost of a complete system failure?
  • nicesteve Kozmo 2012/09/19 23:07:16
    nicesteve
    +1
    Definenately! Nasa backs their stuff up nine ways to sunday, and that will be
    quite essential for a SAFE automated street and highway system.
  • PaulBot415 2012/09/05 01:25:50
    Yes
    PaulBot415
    ...until they develope the ability to think like humans and take over the entire planet. the day when everybody's iphone comes to life seems not far off.
  • Kozmo PaulBot415 2012/09/13 07:23:31
    Kozmo
    Current computers only use 1s & 0s, no 0.5 etc. Fuzzy Logic was supposed to solve this but it's been decades. If we ever get Quantum computers running, each Qubit can potentially have INFINITE choices. Likely true machine sentience would be possible then.
  • WBC_Sux 2012/09/04 23:30:51 (edited)
    Yes
    WBC_Sux
    +2
    Hmmm...

    Cars with digital readouts, screens in the dash, global satellite positioning system, drives itself and talks to you? Sounds like life is finally imitating art. Sign me the f**k up.



    kitt_dash kitt_side
  • kevracer 2012/09/04 22:57:10
    No
    kevracer
    just great- the car hurtles down the freeway at 55 MPH when suddenly a "system error" occurs
  • rph3636 kevracer 2012/09/05 07:32:48
    rph3636
    +2
    And it will happen.
  • william keegan 2012/09/04 22:54:32
    Yes
    william keegan
    A Robot Car can't possibly be more dangerous than some of the drivers I've encountered on the streets and highways.
  • rph3636 william... 2012/09/05 07:35:24
    rph3636
    You're right that is the reason 50% of them shouldn't have a license let alone a auto regardless of how is controled.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 17 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/24 15:44:56

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals