Bride 'Raped by Husband on Wedding Night': Who's in the Wrong?
|
|
|||||
|
33 votes
|
|
17% | |||
|
111 votes
|
|
57% | |||
|
30 votes
|
|
15% | |||
|
6 votes
|
|
3% | |||
|
15 votes
|
|
8% | |||
So
this has been brought to my attention browsing the internet.
"A husband raped his new wife on their
wedding night after she told him she didn't want to have sex, a court heard.
The
woman, who is in her 20s, told Exeter Crown Court she was so drunk after she
returned home from the wedding reception that she told her husband she did not
want to have sex.
However,
her husband ignored her pleas and forced her into it against her will.
He
is also charged with raping her another four times during their two-year
marriage."
Needless
to say, it has sparked some interesting debate. Those who are siding with the
woman are generally saying that a woman has a right to deny sex even to her
husband. If he encroaches on that right, then it
is rape. Others are suggesting that to deny the man sex on his wedding night is
cruel; why’d she marry the guy anyway? Another thing that I noticed that struck me as
interesting is that those who sided with the woman tended to be women and,
likewise, men were siding with the man.
What’s
your take? Who is in the wrong?
Read More: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2138229/Br...
Top Opinion
-
sglmom 2012/05/03 05:19:00The Man.+12Although Married ..
The Partners should HONOR Each other ..
in this unit called family ..
BOTH should decide they want to share intimacy ..
When ONE chooses to not share this ..
HONOR that .. don't force ..
His actions .. by 'taking' .. After she said clearly NO
Is .. by its nature .. RAPE ..


















As I've said with a lot of people, haha, they really sound like an odd pair! You can only wonder what goes on behind their doors with what little information that we have, why they're still together after all this time, if they're still going to be together, more rape cases and all, after people have long forgotten about them.
Very well put! I wish I could rave your whole post twice, nay, thrice!
I almost feel bad for even posting this question because we *don't* have all the facts but...I don't know! I just (most) everyone's input so interesting. :P
Groom should have seen Bride was cold and frigid and not married her.. Groom should not have forced sex upon the frigid bitch...... Groom should have left bride on honeymoon and asked for annulment....
Why did she stay with him after he supposedly raped her the first time? She's as much to blame for being stupid as he is for being horny and wanting to have sex with... Oh wait, she was his WIFE. If she didn't want to have sex with him already on the wedding night then why were they even together? Also, she was 'too drunk' to have sex on their wedding night? Yeah, she sounds like a real peach.
Also, the fact that she was apparently very drunk makes me wonder about the state of his mind as well. Perhaps he was a little drunk himself and so didn't really take her pleas to heart? Mmm...
In a young man's case, there is a primal urge to 'make it happen' as well as a primal fear of ridicule from everyone! If it doesn't happen. Now on any other day, I tend to agree with the female version of 'rape'. But on a 'wedding night', I call it fulfilling the contract, making good on the promise!! A cherry was lost, but that's no big sin, she gets to keep the 'box' the cherry came in. ;]
Again, I believe that, bottom line, the rape was wrong but in this case I think I can at least sympathise with the man. I think in cases such as these, it's easy to forget the vulnerability of humans, you know? How easy it might've been for him in that sexually charged environment to just lose himself. And who knows how heightened his 'instinct' was (suggesting again that he might've been drunk himself).
The suggestion that he's a bully puts a kind of light to the four other rape charges. I still wonder why she stays with him... if she feels threatened by him...I know that's a reason why a lot of women stay with abusers.
Must be a very complicated relationship....I hope for the sake of the woman that they end it.
Thanks for your input!
That "I can't control it" BS is a bit dated.
The opinions of those who have sort of 'been there' is something I appreciate. :)
But as I say I am not advocating that it is ok for men to force themselves on women in any case! I just say, if I were the judge in this case or any case like this, all women beware, there is a universal expectation of sexual intercourse on the wedding night. If sex happens on the wedding night I don't think any woman has any right to call it rape as long as their was no actual physical harm done to her.
The Partners should HONOR Each other ..
in this unit called family ..
BOTH should decide they want to share intimacy ..
When ONE chooses to not share this ..
HONOR that .. don't force ..
His actions .. by 'taking' .. After she said clearly NO
Is .. by its nature .. RAPE ..
I just wanna say 'thanks for the input!'
Nicely put :)