Are you aware of the money being wasted and stolen by AMTRAK employees?
|
|
|||||
|
1 vote
|
|
17% | |||
|
1 vote
|
|
17% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
33% | |||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
33% | |||
‘Outrageous’: Amtrak Employees Likely Stealing $4-$7 Million in Food Each Year
- Posted on August 4, 2012 at 11:35pm
A report by the Government Accountability Office has revealed that taxpayer-funded Amtrak has lost more than $800 million in food and beverage sales over the last ten years, largely due to waste, theft, and a lack of proper oversight.
The New York Times has more information:
The railroad’s food and beverage service has never broken even since it was required by Congress to do so in 1981.
The losses were the focus of a House Transportation and Infrastructure
Committee hearing on Thursday that reflected partisan views over how
Amtrak should be run. Republican lawmakers suggested that food
services should be privatized. Democrats questioned the need for the
hearing, saying the railroad was dealing with the losses.Joseph H. Boardman, president and chief executive of Amtrak,
confirmed the losses but said the railroad was taking steps to address
the problem. “We are still looking for ways to improve our cost recovery,” he said.According to audits by the Government Accountability Office, an
investigative arm of Congress, and the railroad’s own inspector general, Amtrak loses about $80 million a year selling food. Since 2002, Amtrak’s food service has lost $834 million.Amtrak said it was increasing the use of credit cards for food sales to cut down on cash thefts by employees, reducing staff, creating a better system to track inventory and to collect revenue. It has also set up a three-person loss-prevention unit.
[...]
“It’s an outrageous cost to taxpayers,” said John L.
Mica, a Florida Republican and chairman of the House committee. “There
has to be a better way. We can’t keep on paying this subsidy.”
[Emphasis added]

The interior of a state-owned Amtrak passenger car is seen in Glenville, N.Y. , on Thursday, May 31, 2012. (Photo: AP)
So how is the subsidized rail line managing to lose more than $800 million dollars in food and beverage sales in just ten years?
According to the report, Amtrak’s own employees are likely stealing
between $4-$7 million annually, or $40-$70 million over ten years.
Similarly, while the line sells soft drinks for $2, they actually
cost the taxpayer $3.40. Hamburgers sell for $9.50, but cost the
taxpayer a whopping $16. Therefore, even if Amtrak sold 100% of their
inventory, it would still be impossible for them to turn a profit.
One Amtrak employee defended the unsustainable budget, saying: “You
may just see us handing out hamburgers, but we do other things.”
Rep. John Mica (R-Fla.) held a press conference with a $1 burger from
McDonald’s to demonstrate that if the private company can turn a profit
with $1 burgers, a taxpayer-funded “Soviet-style” rail line selling $16 burgers should be able to at least break even.
“You may even see me on an Amtrak train with a sign that says, ‘Don’t eat the food, it adds to deficit spending,’” Mica joked.
But he’s serious about cutting taxpayer liabilities with Amtrak.
“They’re violating the law,” he said, “and I may look at some legal recourse to stop them from doing it.”



















One thing though, why are you expecting Amtrak to break even....but not applying the same standard to other forms of transport? Even if airline ticket prices don't seem to suggest it nowadays, and even if you hear "the highways are paid with gasoline taxes"...nope.....money from the general funds (that is to say, those which US taxpayers contribute to) is what's needed for road and air, yet they aren't held to the same standards (tell me, when was the last time the I-95 turned a profit? But at the same time, if the highway funding was to disappear, things would soon collapse, wouldn't they?) And yes, in the case of those other forms of transport, there is some "waste" involved, that people just don't care to think about.
Perhaps the solution may be some kind of PPP....private-public-partner... with incentives to have private companies "help", or even bring the railways who own the majority of track onboard, provide them with tax breaks for providing the service.
But the reason why Amtrak existed in the first place was because the railroads wanted out of passenger...
One thing though, why are you expecting Amtrak to break even....but not applying the same standard to other forms of transport? Even if airline ticket prices don't seem to suggest it nowadays, and even if you hear "the highways are paid with gasoline taxes"...nope.....money from the general funds (that is to say, those which US taxpayers contribute to) is what's needed for road and air, yet they aren't held to the same standards (tell me, when was the last time the I-95 turned a profit? But at the same time, if the highway funding was to disappear, things would soon collapse, wouldn't they?) And yes, in the case of those other forms of transport, there is some "waste" involved, that people just don't care to think about.
Perhaps the solution may be some kind of PPP....private-public-partner... with incentives to have private companies "help", or even bring the railways who own the majority of track onboard, provide them with tax breaks for providing the service.
But the reason why Amtrak existed in the first place was because the railroads wanted out of passenger service. Richard Nixon hoped that Amtrak would make everyone "shut up", he hoped that it would fail, and everyone would think "well, trains are irrelevant in America", and it would have been his biggest issue if not for Vietnam and Watergate.
Those who say "everyone should just drive or fly" just don't get it...airports are at capacity, so are highways (and "building more" will just sacrifice more land, and the benefits from it will be fleeting at best), so there must be a third choice.
And why should I, a Canadian, care? Because we are more connected to the US than people care to acknowledge, so US fail, others fail. And our VIA Rail was kind of Canada's response to Amtrak. So ideally people should be asking "does VIA Rail have any similar issues?"