Are Social Media Background Checks Invasive?
SodaHead Living
2011/07/13 23:45:56
|
|
|||||
|
117 votes
|
|
64% | |||
|
65 votes
|
|
36% | |||
Criminal background checks and drug testing are commonplace, but with the rise of the Internet and social networking sites like Facebook comes a more picky form of background check.
A few staff members at Gizmodo gave the process a spin by allowing a company called Social Intelligence to run a comb through their online lives, and one of them failed the test.
Don't worry, though. He kept his job.
On the other hand, Gizmodo notes that social media background checks will not report those embarrassing pictures from last Friday's beer pong tournament. (Unless you were sporting a Hitler mustache or something.)
Lucky you!
A few staff members at Gizmodo gave the process a spin by allowing a company called Social Intelligence to run a comb through their online lives, and one of them failed the test.
I flunked hard. When that happens, Social Intelligence creates a report, which it would then send to an employer. And if you don't get a job because of your social media report, you can request a copy. Mine's filled with delightful details, like "subject admits to use of cocaine as well as LSD," and "subject references use of Ketamine."
Don't worry, though. He kept his job.
On the other hand, Gizmodo notes that social media background checks will not report those embarrassing pictures from last Friday's beer pong tournament. (Unless you were sporting a Hitler mustache or something.)
Lucky you!
Read More: http://gizmodo.com/5818774/this-is-a-social-media-...
Top Opinion
-
Mister X 2011/07/14 00:46:00No+11As I tell all my students. "Never post anything online you'd be ashamed to tell your grandma. Even if you post something as private, you're never positive that someone isn't going to make a mistake somewhere, or that someone isn't going to hack your account." Anytime you post something online you unleash it on the world, if you don't want it seen, don't flash it up there. If you don't want someone to hear something, don't say it.























I first read about that Social Intelligence yesterday. I think its just unethical.
But if information is able to be obtained without breaking the law and its not out of your way, you'd probably do that yourself if you were an employer.
More info on background checks: http://www.stuff4you.biz/bcfaq
What concerns me is where does this stop? What will be next? Will Internet search history checks, phone call monitoring, purchasing history, background checks on personal habit tendencies, lie detectors and very much more follow? This is what I call a backdoor version of a police state, corporate fascism, where corporations buy off the influence of our lawmakers and agencies, which were formulated to protect the common person, for its own gain and profit. Knowing full well that our lives are completely dependent upon receiving a source of income from their employme...
What concerns me is where does this stop? What will be next? Will Internet search history checks, phone call monitoring, purchasing history, background checks on personal habit tendencies, lie detectors and very much more follow? This is what I call a backdoor version of a police state, corporate fascism, where corporations buy off the influence of our lawmakers and agencies, which were formulated to protect the common person, for its own gain and profit. Knowing full well that our lives are completely dependent upon receiving a source of income from their employment no actual police, military personel or extreme totalitarian government legislation is needed. It is the perfect tactic of violating our right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that the U.S Constitution gaurantees without (ironically) actually violating our constitutional privacy rights since this is being done through the private sector. Excellent plan for formulating a convenient way in which the government can control the population and its behavior through the clever use of the private sector that funds it.
Do I have the right to express myself through free speech even on the Internet without a potential employer screening me whether it was done in a civil manner or not? Do I have the right to express my political, social and religious views? Maybe I do, for now, but what about in 5 to 10 years from now? I've written about similar issues related to this topic before since this is the perfect way to take away our liberties without actually violating the Bill of Rights and they're doing this gradual enough that we've blindly have been molded into accepting this nonsense for our own self justification of the 'employer's best interests' since we are dependent on them to survive. Just wait until using credit with interest rates for making purchases becomes mandatory to acquire most types of employment opportunities, actually with the credit check system in operation we are just about already there. Where does this end?
It people are going to lose their jobs through f***ing Facebook, then let it be because they feel the need to document their every thought. I can assure you, they aren't all golden.
"I just ate a burrito LOL"
Who gives a bull's @$$?
HOWEVER...it's a fact of life that if you make something public, you will be judged. That's just how the world works. Either censor your facebook or get off it entirely, especially while you're job-searching!!
The oft quoted rule, don't post anything you wouldn't write on a postcard.
I murdered my father while under the influence of PCP.
That isn't true. I didn't murder my father and I've never taken PCP. Just because I post something on the Internet doesn't mean I've sworn to it under oath. If I ever lost or were denied a job due to my social media postings, I would sue that company for all they're worth.
The more interesting 1st Amendment conflicts are from people who refuse to protest quietly. Signs on their lawn, on the car, or yelling on a soap box. You see them on the Warf in San Francisco...and they get in the news, like the guy who planted 1,000's of flags to represent soldiers killed in Iraq...and was told he had to take them down.
Me? I'd take the low road. Meaningful debate is far more fulfilling that direct conflict.