Question Living
Are Pit Bulls "Natural Born" Killers?
CampDavid †DEO VALENTI † July 07, 2008 21:20:04
- 68 answers
- Read all 121 comments
- +19 / -1 raves
Americans love their dogs. Most owners of any particular breed will back up their aminals reputation, by saying "it is how or by who they are raised".
Pit Bulls have accounted for over one half of all 'deaths by dog attack' in America and Canada since 1998. No other dog comes close to their record. Worse yet, most of their victims have been children and elderly.This is not even encluding the number of other dogs & pets the have killed. Even family pet Pits have attacked and killed their own family children and pets.
Several Major Metropolitan Cities, Detriot And Denver to name two, have legally declared & listed Pit Bulls(American Bull dogs) as "Lethal Weapons", making it illegal for minors to own or be in control of one. If found in control of one, it is an automatic 'death sentence' for the animal.
Last year, seven children were killed in Texas alone. One by one more Cities & towns are taking measures to ban Pit Bulls.
Over the years several breeds of dogs have led the list of 'killer' dogs, but none come close to the record the 'Pit Bull Terrier' has racked up! Unfortunantly for the Pit Bull, it is designed & built physically to be a powerful fighting, biting machine. And now stats are showing that it is also 'programmed' to be an animal that attacks & fights to the death.
As a dog lover I hate condemn any animal. I have raised and bred dogs for over 30 years. I know many breeds and their tendencies. Personaly I would never allow my children or grandchildren to be in the possition to be in danger from any animal. The stats prove, and the professionals agree, that Pit Bulls are unpredictable and unstable during stressful stuations, and a likely to attack without any given notice. And since many pits have had their tails cropped, their 'signals of agression may go overlooked.
So I ask, are Pit Bulls "Natural Born Killers", which America should do more to protect our children from.
Pit Bulls have accounted for over one half of all 'deaths by dog attack' in America and Canada since 1998. No other dog comes close to their record. Worse yet, most of their victims have been children and elderly.This is not even encluding the number of other dogs & pets the have killed. Even family pet Pits have attacked and killed their own family children and pets.
Several Major Metropolitan Cities, Detriot And Denver to name two, have legally declared & listed Pit Bulls(American Bull dogs) as "Lethal Weapons", making it illegal for minors to own or be in control of one. If found in control of one, it is an automatic 'death sentence' for the animal.
Last year, seven children were killed in Texas alone. One by one more Cities & towns are taking measures to ban Pit Bulls.
Over the years several breeds of dogs have led the list of 'killer' dogs, but none come close to the record the 'Pit Bull Terrier' has racked up! Unfortunantly for the Pit Bull, it is designed & built physically to be a powerful fighting, biting machine. And now stats are showing that it is also 'programmed' to be an animal that attacks & fights to the death.
As a dog lover I hate condemn any animal. I have raised and bred dogs for over 30 years. I know many breeds and their tendencies. Personaly I would never allow my children or grandchildren to be in the possition to be in danger from any animal. The stats prove, and the professionals agree, that Pit Bulls are unpredictable and unstable during stressful stuations, and a likely to attack without any given notice. And since many pits have had their tails cropped, their 'signals of agression may go overlooked.
So I ask, are Pit Bulls "Natural Born Killers", which America should do more to protect our children from.
Loading... 

Top Comment
-
UNDECIDED. I need more information.
I work in a hospital and I see more dog bites from these animals more than anyother. The parent will say he has never done anything like this before. I hear it all the time.View thread






No. It is how or who raises them that makes the difference.
steven
No. It is how or who raises them that makes the difference.
No. It is how or who raises them that makes the difference.
UNDECIDED. I need more information.
Banning them seems harsh when you consider that for many it means a death sentence! But when you consider the lengths & stubborness a Pit puts into killing when it does attack, and their unpredictability, some major restrictions are needed at least.
UNDECIDED. I need more information.
UNDECIDED. I need more information.
No. It is how or who raises them that makes the difference.
UNDECIDED. I need more information.
Here's a good link for you to read. Might provide some much needed insight.
http://www.pitbulllovers.com/...
No. It's who raises them, but they should still be banned.
Let me give you a good example of what I'm talking about. We have a female Chow, (Bear), that the original owner had until she was 10 months old. We had given him a 40 lb. sack of dry dog food for her because he was unemployed. They kept her chained up in an 8 foot by 8 foot back yard, with no shelter, nor food or water outside.Bear was actually eating her own feces to survive while the 40 lbs. of food sat unopened inside the house. His next door neighbor called the police on him because he was whipping her with a chain leash, for," staring at him through the patio door". We even found out later, that the owners son used to throw lit firecrackers at her while she was chained up in back. The animal control officer knew us well and asked us if we would take care of Bear, naturally we took her in with our Pit Bull and Yellow Lab. The S.O.B. that abused her was fined $150 and required to take 1 week of anger management. He then went back to court to force us to give Bear back to him. Luckily, I was given the opportunity to speak with the judge, and I explained to the judge that we had had Bear in...'
Let me give you a good example of what I'm talking about. We have a female Chow, (Bear), that the original owner had until she was 10 months old. We had given him a 40 lb. sack of dry dog food for her because he was unemployed. They kept her chained up in an 8 foot by 8 foot back yard, with no shelter, nor food or water outside.Bear was actually eating her own feces to survive while the 40 lbs. of food sat unopened inside the house. His next door neighbor called the police on him because he was whipping her with a chain leash, for," staring at him through the patio door". We even found out later, that the owners son used to throw lit firecrackers at her while she was chained up in back. The animal control officer knew us well and asked us if we would take care of Bear, naturally we took her in with our Pit Bull and Yellow Lab. The S.O.B. that abused her was fined $150 and required to take 1 week of anger management. He then went back to court to force us to give Bear back to him. Luckily, I was given the opportunity to speak with the judge, and I explained to the judge that we had had Bear in our home for 2 months, and that she was part of our family now. I also pointed out that all he wanted was to get her and kill her for causing him trouble and that I would not allow that. I pointed out that, I didn't care what the court ruled, that Bear was in fact staying with us permanently. Thankfully, the judge ruled in our favor and Bear is still with us.
But, Candle, this is why I say absolutely NO to a ban on ANY dog. But, it is past time that we started initiating extremely strict animal rights laws and even stricter enforcement of those laws.
As the site says initially;
Pit Bull Abuse
"You are responsible forever for what you have tamed." (From *The Little Prince*)
Pit Bulls are probably the most abused dogs on the planet. The breed suffers horribly at the hand of humans. In the face of potential and outright banning of this breed, the dogs--very real victims--are often completely overlooked. Take a good, hard, long look at the photos below.....
http://www.realpitbull.com/ab...
After seeing this, how can anyone say "ban the breed"? Instead, let's start getting abusers out of society; let's make animal neglect or abuse a FELONY and start enforcement.
No. It is how or who raises them that makes the difference.
UNDECIDED. I need more information.
No. It's who raises them, but they should still be banned.
Also, a few more facts for the "Professionals"; these statistics and more can be found at; http://www.dogsbite.org/bite-...
Study highlights
* Biters are 6.2 times as likely to be male than female
* Biters are 2.6 times as likely to be intact...'''
Also, a few more facts for the "Professionals"; these statistics and more can be found at; http://www.dogsbite.org/bite-...
Study highlights
* Biters are 6.2 times as likely to be male than female
* Biters are 2.6 times as likely to be intact than neutered
* Biters are 2.8 times as likely to be chained as unchained
* Biters were significantly more likely to be German Shepherd or Chow Chow, male and unneutered, 50lbs and above and under 5 years of age
* Biters were significantly more likely to reside in a house with one or more children and more likely to be chained while in the yard
* Children aged 12 and younger were the victims in 51% of all cases; the median age of all bite victims was 12 years (range 1-83 years)
* 64% of bite victims were male
* 76% of the bites were recorded as minor and 24% as severe
* 50% of bites occurred on the sidewalk, street, alley or playground; 30% in the owner's yard; 14% in the owner's house and 4% in the victim's yard
No. It is how or who raises them that makes the difference.
UNDECIDED. I need more information.
No. It's who raises them, but they should still be banned.
UNDECIDED. I need more information.
I'm glad to see that you say that you need more info to make a decision. Here is a great book; The Pit Bull Placebo by Karen Dellise. Published by Anubis Publishing in 2007. This is one of the best books I've read on the Pit Bull.
The following is an excerpt from the book;
First it was the Bloodhound, sensationalized in the dramatizations of Uncle Tom's Cabin. Then it was the Doberman, symbol of the Nazi menace. Today, it is the Pit bull that is vilified for the depravity of his masters. Today, police chase down fleeing Pit bulls in the street, firing dozens of wild shots in response to media-fed rumors of supernatural Pit bull abilities. Politicians coach and nurture this fear with their own brand of rhetoric used to assist in the passing of quick and ineffective legislation created to pacify communities ignorant of the real cause for dog attacks. Hundreds of animal shelters throughout the country kill all unclaimed Pit bull-looking dogs, as they are deemed "unadoptable" solely on their physical appearance. This has occurred because the human/dog bond, the most complex and profound inter-species relationship in the history of mankind, has been reduced to a simple axiom: Breed of dog = degree of dangerousness. We have come to accept that hanging entire breeds of dogs in effigy...'""
I'm glad to see that you say that you need more info to make a decision. Here is a great book; The Pit Bull Placebo by Karen Dellise. Published by Anubis Publishing in 2007. This is one of the best books I've read on the Pit Bull.
The following is an excerpt from the book;
First it was the Bloodhound, sensationalized in the dramatizations of Uncle Tom's Cabin. Then it was the Doberman, symbol of the Nazi menace. Today, it is the Pit bull that is vilified for the depravity of his masters. Today, police chase down fleeing Pit bulls in the street, firing dozens of wild shots in response to media-fed rumors of supernatural Pit bull abilities. Politicians coach and nurture this fear with their own brand of rhetoric used to assist in the passing of quick and ineffective legislation created to pacify communities ignorant of the real cause for dog attacks. Hundreds of animal shelters throughout the country kill all unclaimed Pit bull-looking dogs, as they are deemed "unadoptable" solely on their physical appearance. This has occurred because the human/dog bond, the most complex and profound inter-species relationship in the history of mankind, has been reduced to a simple axiom: Breed of dog = degree of dangerousness. We have come to accept that hanging entire breeds of dogs in effigy for the sins of their owners is an acceptable solution to canine aggression because we have been placated by a Pit Bull Placebo. Like the pharmacologically inactive sugar pill dispensed to pacify a patient who supposes it to be medicine, eradication of the Pit bull is the placebo administered to ease the public's anxiety about dog attacks. The book, The Pit Bull Placebo: The Media, Myths and Politics of Canine Aggression, explores how our views and beliefs about canine aggression have changed over the last 150 years and how our perceptions about the nature and behavior of dogs has been influenced by persons and organizations who often times disseminate information about dog attacks which is tailored to further an agenda unrelated to the improvement of the human/dog bond. We are in the midst of a social hysteria about Pit bulls because we have abandoned centuries-old common-sense and have been duped by inaccurate reporting from the "Pit Bull Paparazzi" and by politicians who traffic in rumors, myths and pseudoscience in their efforts to pass legislation that demonizes dogs while exonerating criminal and abusive owners. If we truly believe that the extremely rare cases of fatal dog attacks merit extreme measures in the management of dogs, if our concern and shock is genuine, then we must be equally genuine and sincere in seeking out and addressing the real causes for these incidents. Only by stepping back from the swirl of present-day hysteria surrounding isolated cases of severe canine aggression and examining the problem from a broader and more objective perspective can we hope to understand and address the human and canine behaviors which contribute to these incidents.
Now with saying that no i am not saying that a no pitbulls will attack because some will just like in every breed... but the REAL percentage of them that wont over weighs the ones that will by FAR..
Just putting in my incite as a Pitbull owner, since my opinion counts and your doesnt.
No. It is how or who raises them that makes the difference.
No. It is how or who raises them that makes the difference.
No. It is how or who raises them that makes the difference.
No. It's who raises them, but they should still be banned.
UNDECIDED. I need more information.
I haven't figured it out yet.