Quantcast

Anti-Cheating Rings: Would It Actually Work?

SodaHead Living 2012/06/28 21:11:48
You!
Add Photos & Videos
If you ever worry that your significant other might remove their wedding ring in a tempting situation, TheCheeky might have just the thing to keep you calm. Their patented "anti-cheating rings" will leave an imprint of the words "I'm Married" on the wearer's finger when the ring is removed, making it literally impossible to cheat. Did we say literally impossible? We meant to say slightly more difficult.

The product page reads, "The negative engraving on the inside means that when you are in the 'Club' and an attractive woman... or man comes along to chat, slipping your wedding ring off is not an option ... Made of strengthened Titanium. Life time guarantee, ‘til death and all that." And it'll only cost you $550! But would it actually work?

i m married
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Depsycho 2012/06/28 21:55:04
    No
    Depsycho
    +21
    .... All they have to do is not wear it.

    Also, people, seriously, this IS YOUR SPOUSE. NOT your DOG.

    You do not OWN your spouse.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • kate Curmudgeon 2012/06/29 01:59:34
    kate
    +1
    well I guess but still prenups always seemed kinda wrong to me
  • Curmudgeon kate 2012/06/29 04:07:58
    Curmudgeon
    +1
    Its only wrong up to the point you realize the person you married only wanted to take half your stuff and leave. At that point your opinions change, or so many of my uncles tell me.
  • JohnT 2012/06/28 22:22:43
    No
    JohnT
    +6
    If wedding rings don't work for some folks how come some other object may work? If folks are going to be bad there isn't much that is going to stop them.
  • penguins in the night 2012/06/28 22:15:23
  • sundance 2012/06/28 22:15:11
    No
    sundance
    +4
    A ring, does not a hole plug...Just a thought....
  • ☆ElenaD... sundance 2012/06/28 22:33:49
    ☆ElenaDiamond☆
    +2
    Or does not a dick soften.
  • sundance ☆ElenaD... 2012/06/29 01:14:29
    sundance
    +2
    Well either way, my statement still holds true. People will cheat, regardless of marital disposition. A marriage license never stopped anyone. Only self respect does...Just a thought...
  • ☆ElenaD... sundance 2012/06/29 01:18:25
    ☆ElenaDiamond☆
    +1
    I agree and said as much. It was the sexism I objected to.
  • sundance ☆ElenaD... 2012/06/29 01:21:13
    sundance
    +2
    I am not sure how you gleaned any sexism. That "ring" comment works both ways. After all, someones pitchin and someones catchin...Right?
  • ☆ElenaD... sundance 2012/06/29 01:53:52
    ☆ElenaDiamond☆
    +1
    Yes, but from your comment you put the question of whether to cheat or not specifically on the woman. The implication was if the hole is open the man will cheat. I don't believe that.
  • sundance ☆ElenaD... 2012/06/29 04:20:23
    sundance
    +2
    OK. First, if you perceived a sexist agenda, that was on you. I left very little room for all, except the most agenda seeking. Second, if in fact, he is going to cheat, then does he not need a willing "hole" by which to cheat? By the way. You envisioned, with my comment, a vagina..... I said nothing of sexual orientation. My point was, and still is, that a "ring" will not plug a hole....Just a thought...
  • ☆ElenaD... sundance 2012/06/29 05:06:09
    ☆ElenaDiamond☆
    +1
    Once again you give the reciever all the say so. Does the Pole not have some control over itself. You belittle men with your comment.
  • sundance ☆ElenaD... 2012/06/29 07:59:20
    sundance
    +2
    Can you not make up your mind? First, you tell me that I am blaming woman for infidelity. You were wrong. Now, you slam me for blaming men. Again, you are in error. So, to whom do we relegate the blame for infidelity? Sperm? Oh sorry, cant do that, as it would be belittling men. Well, that leaves ovum out of it. So, who do we blame? Aliens?...Just a thought...
  • ☆ElenaD... sundance 2012/06/29 13:31:25
    ☆ElenaDiamond☆
    +2
    Finishing every comment with just a thought is kind of trite, but continue on.

    How about this thought. MEN, and WOMEN are repsonsible for their own cheating. Period.
  • sundance ☆ElenaD... 2012/06/29 19:09:37
  • Willski 2012/06/28 22:12:28
    No
    Willski
    +7
    what's to say the person they're with cares if they're married or not?
    anyway, easy enough to hide even if they do.
    and of course, take the ring off in advance, and the message goes away.
  • Omni 2012/06/28 22:11:32 (edited)
    No
    Omni
    +5
    How sad your marriage must be if you trust your husband so little that you'd force him to wear one of these. I thought part of marriage was trusting your spouse?
  • ♥•judy•♥ 2012/06/28 22:11:16
    No
    ♥•judy•♥
    +4
    chetas gonna cheat and turns out these people dont care if your married or not does not matter
  • JS 2012/06/28 22:07:57
    No
    JS
    +4
    You've got to be kidding me.
  • The Catalyst 2012/06/28 22:07:15
    No
    The Catalyst
    +2
    I don't think it would actually work.
  • ♥☯ ʂıoвнaп ☮♥ 2012/06/28 22:06:09
    No
    ♥☯ ʂıoвнaп ☮♥
    +3
    If someone really wants to cheat, they'll do it anyway. No ring or imprint from one will stop infidelity.
  • Depsycho 2012/06/28 21:55:04
    No
    Depsycho
    +21
    .... All they have to do is not wear it.

    Also, people, seriously, this IS YOUR SPOUSE. NOT your DOG.

    You do not OWN your spouse.
  • RobertM... Depsycho 2012/06/29 21:21:35
    RobertMorgan
    +6
    "You do not OWN your spouse."

    Really? "To have and to hold, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health, till death do us part" is way more of a commitment than i have to anything I actually own....so I would disagree. Your spouse completely owns you and vice-versa....if not then why get married? Tax benefits?
  • Depsycho RobertM... 2012/06/30 04:30:47
    Depsycho
    +2
    That verse doesn't translate as ownership of anything to me, it is a vow, and nothing more, nothing less.

    To say you "own" someone disgusts me. If any man said to me that marrying me meant owning me, I'd be tempted to slap them. Why would you want to OWN the person you love anyway? Because you think they're property? Wrong.
  • Nate Hu... Depsycho 2012/06/29 22:31:29
    Nate Hubert
    +5
    Well.... You see, when you marry someone, you are both making a sacred commitment to stay true to each other for the rest of your lives. The two of you are joined in union, becoming one heart and one soul. Inseparable. If that's not ownership I don't know what is...

    I guess people these days are just greedy, selfish, arrogant, unfaithful snobs. "I should get whatever I want, at anyone else's expense." What happened to this country...
  • Depsycho Nate Hu... 2012/06/30 04:32:38
    Depsycho
    +2
    If that were true, then there wouldn't be divorces at all. To become one heart and one soul?.... no. No matter how sacred marriage is, you can't read one another's minds, and if one dies, the other won't simultaneously.

    I do agree that marriage is a big deal, but let's face it, more than half the time marriages end in divorce. No one marries their true love anymore.
  • Nate Hu... Depsycho 2012/06/30 22:32:38 (edited)
    Nate Hubert
    +2
    Say what you want (and who knows, maybe you've never been to a wedding before?) but the entire ceremony of marriage revolves around the union of a man and a woman. Whether symbolically or literally, the two are *supposed* to be joining their souls together for life.

    My grandparents were married for over 60 years... when my grandfather died, my grandmother wasn't long behind him. They might not have shared the same physical bodies, but they were very much joined in spirit, on a level I suppose you must never have shared with another person. They shared everything with each other: thoughts, feelings, ideals and more. They were inseparable, literally and metaphorically. And it's not just my grandparents; my great-grandparents were married for over 70 years when they died (separated by a few short months), and were connected in the same way; and now, one of my best friends is about to marry his fiancé, and I can see them headed in the same direction. It's almost like they're the same person; when one of them isn't around, it's like the one who *is* around, is missing something. It's hard to put into words.

    So, yes, I know first-hand that marriage, in the way it is meant to be, is very possible.


    I don't care if you think it's naïve to think the way I do. But the fact that so many people think the same way as you do on these (and other) things just further proves my point - and further destroys my faith in people.
  • Depsycho Nate Hu... 2012/07/02 05:24:13
    Depsycho
    Touching, that is what an ideal marriage is like. However it is not reality, or at least not for the majority. Half of marriages these days end in divorce for more than one reason.

    I understand that some do indeed have the perfect relationship with one another and truly feel connected, but indeed I have yet to see that myself in anyone with the exception of my own great grandparents. They'd stayed together since they married at age 17 back in the 40's. A relatively flawless marriage that ended with illness in their old age mere years ago.

    The same was not reflected for my grandmother and her first husband, nor my own mother and father, who are practically polar opposites in almost every way. It is my belief that some things come on a whim and we believe them to be something that will last, but they do not. They were close before, but have since drifted apart and are in the middle of a divorce.

    My own grandmother was married to her first husband, my mother's father, for little more than seven years before she started dating who was to be her second and final husband until death, while she was still with her first husband.

    My blood grandfather and grandmother were not much more than a fun night for the both of them that resulted in pregnancy, which turned to a short marriage to t...

    Touching, that is what an ideal marriage is like. However it is not reality, or at least not for the majority. Half of marriages these days end in divorce for more than one reason.

    I understand that some do indeed have the perfect relationship with one another and truly feel connected, but indeed I have yet to see that myself in anyone with the exception of my own great grandparents. They'd stayed together since they married at age 17 back in the 40's. A relatively flawless marriage that ended with illness in their old age mere years ago.

    The same was not reflected for my grandmother and her first husband, nor my own mother and father, who are practically polar opposites in almost every way. It is my belief that some things come on a whim and we believe them to be something that will last, but they do not. They were close before, but have since drifted apart and are in the middle of a divorce.

    My own grandmother was married to her first husband, my mother's father, for little more than seven years before she started dating who was to be her second and final husband until death, while she was still with her first husband.

    My blood grandfather and grandmother were not much more than a fun night for the both of them that resulted in pregnancy, which turned to a short marriage to take responsibility for the unexpected child, my mother, though it was brief. It was rather useless to bother marrying, as my great grandmother was more of a mother to my mother than HER own mother was.

    That said, true, I have a bit of a bias, but I also see things from a logical perspective and compare statistics. Love is indeed a beautiful thing when it is true, but it seems to be rare among our current era, hence why I'm rather coarse toward the idea of combining souls and minds. Sacred as it is, they are still two separate people with their own thoughts and beliefs.
    (more)
  • myranya 2012/06/28 21:48:33
    No
    myranya
    +6
    Turn it regularly and the imprint will be illegible.
  • Aingean 2012/06/28 21:38:33
    No
    Aingean
    +8
    Cheaters cheat, it doesn't matter if they have a WEDDING ring on ant anti cheating ring wont stop them either.
  • Philo-Publius 2012/06/28 21:34:15
    No
    Philo-Publius
    +11
    They're just not visible enough, especially in the dimly-lit areas they'll be frequenting when the urge to jump on something strange hits, such as a sleazy bar or behind a 7-11 at three in the morning. No, nothing short of a dye pack-loaded ring like the ones bank tellers are trained to stick in the money bags when a robbery is occurring, which upon removal explodes and covers the cheater's entire front side (including their genitals) will deter an amorous member of the opposite (or in this day and age, same) sex from pursuing.
    dye dye2 dye3 dye 4
  • dustin.oubre 2012/06/28 21:31:14
    No
    dustin.oubre
    +6
    If someone wants to cheat, they'll go ahead and do it.
  • Mikewlf337 2012/06/28 21:27:52
    No
    Mikewlf337
    +12
    A cheater will cheat no matter what.
  • Sister Jean 2012/06/28 21:23:33
  • SarcasticB*tch 2012/06/28 21:23:32 (edited)
    No
    SarcasticB*tch
    +6
    if i sit on a lawn chair in shorts, i'll have the pattern imprinted on my leg.

    but it's not permanently there. it fades.

    now Tattoo Wedding Rings? so permanent that if you got a divorce, everyone would still think you're married
  • The Elitist Libtard SodaJerk 2012/06/28 21:13:47
    No
    The Elitist Libtard SodaJerk
    +6
    I thought that was the intent of "Wedding" Rings.
  • Lili13 2012/06/28 21:13:24
    No
    Lili13
    +3
    What if they change the ring ?? Or refuse to wear this one ? =]

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/06/19 22:19:03

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals