I don't give a hoot....big deal...The libs talk about anything but the bad economy and Obama and Michelle's spending........etc...
The libs~~~ they are all nuts....
Ann Romney's $990 Bird T-Shirt: Stylish or Stupid?
SodaHead Living
2012/05/03 23:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
114 votes
|
|
32% | |||
|
240 votes
|
|
68% | |||
The blog-o-sphere is still chirping about the bird shirt Ann Romney wore on CBS' "This Morning" on Wednesday, and the fact that it was hideously ugly wasn't even the news. Ann Romney's silk shirt costs $990, Styleite reports.


Critics say wearing the shirt -- part of Reed Krakoff’s spring 2012 ready-to-wear collection -- was a particularly foolish move for the first lady hopeful, as she and her multi-millionaire husband struggle to relate to average Americans. Meghan McCain, an MSNBC contributor, slammed the shirt on Lawrence O’Donnell’s "The Last Word."
"She needs to be a little more cognizant of the message she’s trying to put out, just given the economic recession that we're in and everything that's going on," McCain said. And this is just when we'd forgotten that Ann drives a "couple" of Cadillacs. Do you think her pricey bird shirt is stylish -- or stupid?
"She needs to be a little more cognizant of the message she’s trying to put out, just given the economic recession that we're in and everything that's going on," McCain said. And this is just when we'd forgotten that Ann drives a "couple" of Cadillacs. Do you think her pricey bird shirt is stylish -- or stupid?
Top Opinion
-
Pearlie Momi♥Patriot Warrior♥ 2012/05/04 03:56:26Stylish






















If I acted like a 3rd grade numbskull bully along with him, he would be offering high fives. Since I didn't, he blocked me after 4 different hit and runs. To call him a baby is an insult to babies.
Oh, the hilarity. And he thinks Romney is the answer!!!
have a nice day. I am going to choose not to lower myself to your level melly.
But since you bring it up, you think Ann won't be going on state visits to foreign countries? ALL First Ladies have and do.
Ann will just be doing it in butt-ugly t-shirts.
Ann has good taste and the resources to support that good taste. go rag on a liberal,
michele, nancy,maxine for a change
Ann Romney's shirt was bought by Ann, not the tax payers.
""Seemingly simple: Michelle Obama's dress for a church service at the Kaneohe Bay Marine Base on Christmas Day was by Sophie Theallet and would have set her back almost $2,000 when she bought it in 2009.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/fe...
If Ann can, why not Michelle? Why two sets of standards?
Only one Obama child went on that trip, not children (plural).
You have to EQUALLY apply that to BOTH sides.
First Ladies get some clothing donated to them by designers, who in turn get the exposure. But if not, a gown for, say, a state dinner can be charged to the expense account because it is for an official state function. An outfit for appearing on a talk show cannot be charged to the expense account, because that is not an official state function, a First Lady would have to buy that outfit herself. The $550 sneakers Michelle wore to the food bank that the right made such a big deal of she paid for herself. Any amounts that are left in the expense accounts at the end of the year are returned to the treasury.
The Obama's are worth over $10MM, Michelle can spend her own money the way she wants, just like Ann.
The Obama's can spend their own money the way they choose, just like Annie Rich can.
All First Families get a certain amount of money each year--an amount that is approved by Congress--for expenses, which includes clothing and other personal incidentals. CONGRESS sets this amount, not the First Family. Anything that goes over that allotment the First Family must pay for themselves out of the president's $400,000/year salary or their own personal wealth.
The Obama's are personally worth over $10 million. Nothing close to Ann's $250 million, but $10 MM is enough for Michelle to buy whatever clothing she wants. If Michelle wants to spend her own money on more expensive clothing, it's none of your business either.
Keep in mind that if the Romney's are in the White House, Mitt will get that $400,000/year salary and Ann will get that clothing expense account, the same amount that Michelle gets. Ann will STILL be spending YOUR taxpayer money on those God-awful fish or bird t-shirts at $990/pop, at least until she taps out the expense account.
Enjoy that thought.
The taxpayers paid for Air Force One to and from Spain because the First Family must ALWAYS use AF1; they are prohibited from using commercial airliners. Part of the trip was an official state visit, she met with the country's King and Queen. Those days were paid for by the taxpayers.
But once Michelle and her friends were officially on vacation, they paid for it all themselves, their own hotel, meals, entertainment, everything EXCEPT SS protection. The taxpayers always pay for that, whether the First Lady is in Spain or at Target. And yes, the taxpayer pays for the hotels and meals of those SS agents when they travel with the First Family.
Judicial Watch sued to get the expense reports of the trip and made them public, that's where the $467,000 taxpayer cost came from. They did not find anything that was improper, nothing was put on the taxpayer dime that should not have been.
The Obama's are worth over $10 MM personally; Michelle could certainly afford to spend her money that way if she wanted to.