Blogs American BadAss ~ In Your Face!'s
American Psychological Association revises 'gay gene' theory!
- May 23, 2009 23:49:20
- Read all 704 comments
- +43 / -8 raves
Charlie Butts - OneNewsNow - 5/14/2009 6:30:00 AM
The attempt to prove that homosexuality is determined biologically has been dealt a knockout punch. An American Psychological Association publication includes an admission that there's no homosexual 'gene' -- meaning it's not likely that homosexuals are born that way.
For decades, the APA has not considered homosexuality a psychological disorder, while other professionals in the field consider it to be a "gender-identity" problem. But the new statement, which appears in a brochure called "Answers to Your Questions for a Better Understanding of Sexual Orientation & Homosexuality," states the following:
"There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles...."
That contrasts with the APA's statement in 1998: "There is considerable recent evidence to suggest that biology, including genetic or inborn hormonal factors, play a significant role in a person's sexuality." Peter LaBarbera, who heads Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, believes the more recent statement is an important admission because it undermines a popular theory.
"People need to understand that the 'gay gene' theory has been one of the biggest propaganda boons of the homosexual movement over the last 10 [or] 15 years," he points out. "Studies show that if people think that people are born homosexual they're much less likely to resist the gay agenda."
Matt Barber with Liberty Counsel feels the pronouncement may have something to do with saving face. "Well, I think here the American Psychological Association is finally trying to restore some credibility that they've lost over the years by having become a clearly political organization as opposed to an objective, scientific organization," he states.
With the new information from the APA, Barber wonders if the organization will admit that homosexuals who want to change can change.
I have never been a believer that homosexuals were born that way. I have always considered it a matter of choice. When gays say that they were born that way I believe they are looking for a way to justify their abnormal behavior. I don't hate gays or anything like that, but I don't like ANYONE using lame and unproven psycological theories to make their own uncontrollable lust more members of the same sex seem more acceptable and "normal."
Article: http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=528376
Audio: http://www.onenewsnow.com/uploadedFiles/Media/Audio/2009/05/1...
Brochure: http://www.apa.org/topics/sorientation.html#whatcauses
The attempt to prove that homosexuality is determined biologically has been dealt a knockout punch. An American Psychological Association publication includes an admission that there's no homosexual 'gene' -- meaning it's not likely that homosexuals are born that way.
For decades, the APA has not considered homosexuality a psychological disorder, while other professionals in the field consider it to be a "gender-identity" problem. But the new statement, which appears in a brochure called "Answers to Your Questions for a Better Understanding of Sexual Orientation & Homosexuality," states the following:
"There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles...."
That contrasts with the APA's statement in 1998: "There is considerable recent evidence to suggest that biology, including genetic or inborn hormonal factors, play a significant role in a person's sexuality." Peter LaBarbera, who heads Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, believes the more recent statement is an important admission because it undermines a popular theory.
"People need to understand that the 'gay gene' theory has been one of the biggest propaganda boons of the homosexual movement over the last 10 [or] 15 years," he points out. "Studies show that if people think that people are born homosexual they're much less likely to resist the gay agenda."
Matt Barber with Liberty Counsel feels the pronouncement may have something to do with saving face. "Well, I think here the American Psychological Association is finally trying to restore some credibility that they've lost over the years by having become a clearly political organization as opposed to an objective, scientific organization," he states.
With the new information from the APA, Barber wonders if the organization will admit that homosexuals who want to change can change.
I have never been a believer that homosexuals were born that way. I have always considered it a matter of choice. When gays say that they were born that way I believe they are looking for a way to justify their abnormal behavior. I don't hate gays or anything like that, but I don't like ANYONE using lame and unproven psycological theories to make their own uncontrollable lust more members of the same sex seem more acceptable and "normal."
Article: http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=528376
Audio: http://www.onenewsnow.com/uploadedFiles/Media/Audio/2009/05/1...
Brochure: http://www.apa.org/topics/sorientation.html#whatcauses
Top Comment
-
I am so glad they have proven this., It would be nice if it stopped some mouths but, they will still say they were born that way , what else are they going to use as a means to justify the act.... I don't hate gays but I don't agree with the life style..View thread
About Me
Recent Posts
Hot on SodaHead
the idea of a gene to be found has been written off long ago, and by the gay community...who all think may never be found.
God may have wanted that way - who REALLY knows - I mean, it is one of the last great civil rights issues, and maybe God would like to think BY THIS TIME we should know how to treat others (as we would like to be treated), etc.
What I and many have suggested for the last 15 years is (with the APA's) that homosexuality is simply another human characteristic; such as being left handed (no gene for that) or the fact that eyes have to have color (although the parental genes will determine WHAT color)...
And, pressure to change, backed by buku money from donating Christians to fight God's gay children from the far right on the APA's has been HUMUNGUS the past 8 years.
No - another diverse and complicated mystery of a small group in every society for eons of time, who, at least under the guarantees of Constitutional freedoms of the United States of America should have equality as others do to marry "the person" they love. Sad other countries have seen this long before us.
It's pretty obvious that God considers homosexuality to be sin - immorality. I live in another kind of sin, but at least I'm honest about it!
Any attempt to extend the position to imply that Homosexuality is "merely a choice" or "can be changed at will" is moving FAR beyond what the APA said and into unsupported territory.
The argument suggests some minorities are "valid" (where you don't have a choice) and another kind is "invalid" (where you do). The logic suggests that "valid" minorities have some kind of flaw or fault, but they can't help it. That is not right, it is smelly logic.
Do we tolerate black people because they can't help being black -- because it is "not their fault"? Ridiculous. We tolerate them because being a member of a minority is not a fault at all. We welcome people, black or white because at a fundamental place where people contribute and join society, they are the same. What if black people could choose to be white? What if someone discovered a pill they could take? Would we make them take it? No! Being black is a part of who they are.
Well, being gay is a part of who I am. It wouldn't matter to me if I could change it. I am as valuable a person as anyone else.
"Well, being gay is a part of who I am. It wouldn't matter to me if I could change it. I am as valuable a person as anyone else." I don't know if this is a new post, or if you just edited an old one, but I give you props for being honest and stating your case so clearly. You see, I don't care personally about a person's sexuality if they are honest about it and not trying to MAKE me accept homosexuality as being normal. I don't think it is normal, and I seriously doubt that I ever will. But instead of attacking me or spewing ...''''''
"Well, being gay is a part of who I am. It wouldn't matter to me if I could change it. I am as valuable a person as anyone else." I don't know if this is a new post, or if you just edited an old one, but I give you props for being honest and stating your case so clearly. You see, I don't care personally about a person's sexuality if they are honest about it and not trying to MAKE me accept homosexuality as being normal. I don't think it is normal, and I seriously doubt that I ever will. But instead of attacking me or spewing hatred in my direction, you simply state your worth and value as a human being, and you are absolutely right. Being gay doesn't make you any less valuable than anyone else! For what you said in this above post I respect you a great deal and would stand by your side and defend your right to be who you are. If every gay I ever encountered were as peaceful and respectful as you are in this post your cause would be well served, and you might be able to win more support for your battle for gay marriage! I never thought I would say anything like that!
I have to admit that I am an asshole, but not as big an asshole as everyone seems to think. Now I'm going to read back through your posts and see if you are consistently moderate as you seem to be here. You should change you name to 'BadAss Homosexual' or 'Gay BadAss' or something. I mean that in kind terms. Good post!!!
And you are scaring me -- reading through my posts! I guarantee you will find some of them aren't reasonable at all. LOL!! Sometimes, I get pretty angry. -- And you are a tough debater.
But seriously, I appreciate your question, and I appreciate that you don't block people when you disagree with them.
Spelling eddit.
I'll answer these questions for you... A bigoted self righteous nut case who worships a zombie...
Any questions?
No, really, from my softer side, you are ignorant enough to take the word of Psychologists words on genetic science? Really?
Careful how you paint my town friend... you may have an issue... come visit, we'll show you a damn good time.