American Apparel Debuts First Transgender Model: Great or Gimmicky?
SodaHead Living
2012/06/15 19:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
603 votes
|
|
57% | |||
|
461 votes
|
|
43% | |||
June is LGBT Pride Month, making it the perfect time for American Apparel to debut its first transgender model, former "America’s Next Top Model" contestant Isis King. King, 26, appears in a series of new ads for the provocative clothing chain, wearing Pride Month T-shirts.

"American Apparel is showing bold leadership by being among just a few companies to include transgender people in its national ads," GLAAD President Herndon Graddick said in a statement. "The company’s statement that 'Gay is OK' will reach millions and send an important message in support of equality." King, 26, was the first transgender contestant on "Top Model," too. Do you think American Apparel is making a bold move toward equality by using her in their ads? Or is it just a gimmicky way to get attention?

"American Apparel is showing bold leadership by being among just a few companies to include transgender people in its national ads," GLAAD President Herndon Graddick said in a statement. "The company’s statement that 'Gay is OK' will reach millions and send an important message in support of equality." King, 26, was the first transgender contestant on "Top Model," too. Do you think American Apparel is making a bold move toward equality by using her in their ads? Or is it just a gimmicky way to get attention?
Top Opinion
-
Nilam 2012/06/15 22:03:12Great+36geez people, when is society gonna grow up. why should anyone care about another persons preference? media has freely exposed sex, drugs, violence, and much much more and noone seems to have a problem with it, why all the fuss over gay? i personal dont enjoy being with someone of the same sex, but if someone else does, how is that even any of my business? i really dont see the big deal.........























Most baisic instincts."?
We now celebrate depravity and dysfunction.
Yet another sign of the decay and decline of our civilization.
Notice that the wearing of clothes that PERTAINS to a man is also shot down and yet women wear more masculine styles than not. Pants come to mind. Funny how they leave that part out.
Why shouldn't she be allowed to do what she wants just for not wanting to be a boy?
I believe that everyone deserves happiness, as long as they don't have to hurt anyone else to gain it. Does this hurt anybody? No. So why is it even up for discussion?
It would feel less "Gimmicky" to me if they didn't put her in the "Gay OK" type shirts , because it feels like they're just doing that because she's "transgender"...and they could just refer to her as a she/female/woman etc. instead of using the whole "transgender" label...She's a woman is most likely happy being a woman , and has most likely always been a woman , and personally , to me , it feels like they're just using the label "transgender" to get support from the LGBT community......That's just my opinion though. ^^