A Square Peg Being Hammered into a Round Hole and Not a Rainbow Should be the Symbol of the ‘Gay’ Rights Movement?
The New Yorker magazine’s new cover shows the White House with rainbow columns. Please tell me what a rainbow has to do with same-sex sex? Nothing, and that’s the point. Using the word ‘gay’ and choosing the rainbow image to represent the homosexual rights movement were deliberate acts of distraction. How many times have you ever heard someone describe what homosexuals do that makes them homosexuals?
Men and women were designed to be compatible sexually. Two men or two women engaged in a sexual relationship will never reproduce. This type of feedback should tell anyone engaging in the practice that the behavior is illogical. Homosexual ‘marriage’ is like screwing two incandescent bulbs together and expecting light to come forth. Homosexual behavior is like sticking a square peg into a round hole over and over again and expecting a different result sometime in the future.
Read More: http://godfatherpolitics.com/5185/a-square-peg-bei...
Top Opinion
-
+20And reading your post about your hatred and misunderstanding of homosexuality is like listening to a toilet flush...
Anything else?






















Take up a hobby, maybe read a book, hell build something but stay out of other people's business!
HUEHUECOYOTL
Besides, it's their life, it's their business what they do.
As far as using rainbows and the word "gay," all kinds of organizations and movements have chosen all kinds of labels and symbols since, well, since just about as long as there have been organizations and movements. Did the United States put stars on its flag as a "deliberate act of distraction?"
So what would you select for the symbol of bigotry? A noose round the neck of all that are "other" than you?
is close. But I think this is far more accurate.
This SHOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE IN THE UPCOMING ELECTIONS. It's a distraction from the real issues and we need to demand they stop trying to divert us as if we are lower intelligence beings.
Addressing your second point. There are lots of straight married couples who don't now and don't intend to have children, for a variety of reasons. Do you suggest that their marriages are somehow illigitimate for that reason? Set aside the fact that options such as adoption and surrogacy are viable and readily available. Procreation is not the sole purpose for marriage. Marriage is first and foremost the single greatest affiramtion of one individuals love and committment to another. A symbolic binding of two individuals into a single unified entity for the rest of their lives. The gender of the individuals involved isn't as important as is the strength of their convictions.
I think that if you ask people which of these two options best characterize the institution of marriage...
...it shouldn't be surprising that most people would choose "B".
-----------------------------...
1) Who gives a f@ck?
2) All you're saying is that marriage is only about getting your rocks off. If you're comfortable marrying someone who wants to marry you only because he thinks of you as a piece of ass, you're free to do that in this country. But what makes you think that you have the right to deny others the right to marry because they choose to do so based on love, commitment or a covenant with God? You are free to think that love, commitment and covenants with God are BS, but you do not have the right to prevent people from exercising choosing to base their lives on those things.
Anyway, plenty of heterosexuals engage in a similar type of sex...does that make them "illogical"? Probably not.
Anything else?
Why do you care? Unless you trying to figure out how to classify yourself ... oh that is it ... sweetie this is not the platform for that....
In addition, if the indoctrination persists, parents should start keeping their child home from the school one day per week, which affects how much funding the schools get from the county.
Once there is enough participation and a 20% drop in school funding, perhaps they'll start getting the message.
The hypocrisy on both sides disgusts me. but specifically the right disgusts me on this issue. you bitch and complain about homosexuals and the idea of them getting married as somehow inherently offensive and how marriage is an institution of god (which it isn't, you just usurped it) you make up lies about how gay marriage is bad for children yet you give no proof. you say that gay couples give rise to gay children, which it doesn't, you can't "give someone the gay".
"This type of feedback should tell anyone engaging in the practice that the behavior is illogical." it's pretty illogical to focus on a topic that has little to no consequence as letting people marry when there's bigger, actual important issues out there.
how about instead of lying about how gay marriage affects you(because it doesn't and never will affect you), you put your energy on important issues.
I always say discuss the issue, not the person.
Really ? lol
Ron Paul voted AGAINST awarding Rosa Parks the Congressional Medal of Freedom.
Ron Paul said he would have voted AGAINST the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Paul has a 30 year history of pandering to the KKK and White Power Movement.
You can make all the LAME excuses for White Supremacist Ron Paul you want. His actions speak louder than words
-FACT: Ron Paul's presidential campaign issued a flyer that boasted about the candidate's efforts to introduce legislation that would remove challenges to the anti-gay Defense of Marriage Act from the federal court system.
http://www.joemygod.blogspot....
-FACT: Ron Paul's Iowa state director is Mike Heath, a long-term Christian-right activist who formerly served as the board chairman of an SPLC-certified anti-gay hate group known as "Americans for Truth About Homosexuality."
http://thenewcivilrightsmovem...
-FACT: Ron Paul has a long history of racist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic comments.
http://www.tnr.com/article/po...
-FACT: As state above, Ron Paul supports the so-called "states' rights" approach to marriage, but interestingly, only for LGBT couples.
http://www.yourtango.com/2008...
-FACT: Ron Paul said, "If I were in Congress in 1996, I would have voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, which used Cong...
Really ? lol
Ron Paul voted AGAINST awarding Rosa Parks the Congressional Medal of Freedom.
Ron Paul said he would have voted AGAINST the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Paul has a 30 year history of pandering to the KKK and White Power Movement.
You can make all the LAME excuses for White Supremacist Ron Paul you want. His actions speak louder than words
-FACT: Ron Paul's presidential campaign issued a flyer that boasted about the candidate's efforts to introduce legislation that would remove challenges to the anti-gay Defense of Marriage Act from the federal court system.
http://www.joemygod.blogspot....
-FACT: Ron Paul's Iowa state director is Mike Heath, a long-term Christian-right activist who formerly served as the board chairman of an SPLC-certified anti-gay hate group known as "Americans for Truth About Homosexuality."
http://thenewcivilrightsmovem...
-FACT: Ron Paul has a long history of racist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic comments.
http://www.tnr.com/article/po...
-FACT: As state above, Ron Paul supports the so-called "states' rights" approach to marriage, but interestingly, only for LGBT couples.
http://www.yourtango.com/2008...
-FACT: Ron Paul said, "If I were in Congress in 1996, I would have voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, which used Congress' constitutional authority to define what official state documents other states have to recognize under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, to ensure that no state would be forced to recognize a same-sex marriage license issued in another state."
http://www.thepoliticalguide....
-FACT: Ron Paul opposes the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would prohibit discrimination against employees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity by civilian, nonreligious employers.
http://www.salon.com/2007/09/...