nothing wrong with it ,he's just marking his territory..the problem will come when he checks his property and see's ..jerry, george, pepe, john, peter, the milkman, the plumber, i guy i was always attracted too before i meet you and sally my hairdresser..also tattooed on his wife's private part !
I'm all for fidelity and moving statements but this is more like a dog pissing on a fire hydrant to mark territory. Unless they're into polyandry or the like, her tattoo is implied. On the surface, he'd probably like to portray it as romantic and sweet but the underlying message is to the point, figuratively and literally, and punctuated by the tattooist's needle many times like a thousand exclamation marks. Fidelity, yes. Making it a marked possession kind of thing? No.
But more toward the creepy side. The only thing that could be considered romantic about it would be the idea of her being willing to go through the pain of having it done to please her fella...but even that is kinda creepy too.
The way I heard the story, the woman had labia that looked more like the pages in a Rolodex. Luckily the section for the letter of his last name still had room for his entry.
(no one take offense lol) I don't think getting anyone significant others name ANYWHERE is a good idea let alone on his privates,,,,,,, if they divorce image his next sexual encounter. If i seen that....om my laaawdy im curious to wther he was hard/soft during the tattoo or how that worked out too lmao
If he had tattooed her name on His private area, that would be a different story, but by him permanently marking Her genitals with His name, is just like branding your livestock, telling everybody, this is my property. Nobody owns another person, at least in the US. I can't believe the wife went along with this. Maybe he got her real wasted, very strange.
Where's the "just plain stupid" option, please? And what was the wife thinking? Some people will never learn. I wonder if she got her name tattoed on his junk? If she did, I (i) hope her name was something long like Marguerite, and (2) that for her sake there was enough room to do it! ;0)
Really neither imo. Just plain stupid since there's a 50% chance they will get divorced. I wonder if she lets him leash her and go for walks. Nothing against this if that's what they're into. But a lover's name tattoo is idiotic in all circumstances except on one's deathbed. There is virtually no chance of breaking up in that circumstance.
He sounds insecure. Is it a stamp of overship or something? You get the sense he is afraid she's going to cheat or something. Hopefully he has an incredibly common name.
i dont c how that could even be romantic in the slightest LOL, more like a possessive hubby, his way or making sure no way another man goes there i guess but why not vice versa? lol just a very silly thing to do on both parts.
I'm all for fidelity and moving statements but this is more like a dog pissing on a fire hydrant to mark territory. Unless they're into polyandry or the like, her tattoo is implied. On the surface, he'd probably like to portray it as romantic and sweet but the underlying message is to the point, figuratively and literally, and punctuated by the tattooist's needle many times like a thousand exclamation marks. Fidelity, yes. Making it a marked possession kind of thing? No.
Freudian. A bit. Heh.
The way I heard the story, the woman had labia that looked more like the pages in a Rolodex. Luckily the section for the letter of his last name still had room for his entry.
Same if she came up with the idea to get him tattooed with her name. It'd be creepy. If he thought of getting a tat of her name on himself why not?
Nothing against this if that's what they're into. But a lover's name tattoo is idiotic in all circumstances except on one's deathbed. There is virtually no chance of breaking up in that circumstance.
Have a nice day !