SodaHead Celebrates Green Week

Question Living

8-Year-Old Kills Father After Teaching Him How To Use Gun: Do you think that children should be allowed to handle guns?

Peter Griffin November 10, 2008 20:06:53

The man who was shot to death by his own son has been laid to rest today at St. Johns, Arizona. The 8-year-old boy is scheduled to appear in court later Monday. He is charged with using a .22 caliber hunting rifle to kill his father Vincent Romero, 29, and a co-worker Timothy Romans, 39, who rented a room in the house. Police say they see no reason why the son committed this act, there was also no indication that the boy has been abused. Under Arizona law, the boy can be charged as an adult. The Romero family, were active hunters who at some point taught him how to handle a gun. Officials say that they are shocked on how the boy managed to load and handle guns at very young age, it was obviously not his first time. This tragic story could have been prevented.

boy managed load handle guns young age tragic story prevented
Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.
No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.
Undecided
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Comment
  • +11 raves Dem0072 November 12, 2008 10:12:28
    Dem0072

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    This is a perfect example of knee-jerk reactions, and people making decisions based on their emotions and not reality, and not the average.

    I was taught to use guns at the age of 14, and I have several friends who were taught between ages 6 and 10. None of us have ever had any problems, we all act responsibly, and gun safety is the highest priority.

    It's 2nd Amendment right, and I am disgusted with people who want to control laws that infringe on the activities of other families. I can't believe that any American would think they are sane in trying to control the people around them by abusing and manipulating the legal system.

    The above is a failure on behalf of the parents to properly instruct and instill a proper safety-first mindset into the child. They put too much garbage in, and got a big problem out.

    Truth be known, I'll probably buy my kids their first rifles at age 10.
    View thread
Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Comments
  • barry sucks April 23, 2009 09:30:51 (edited)
    barry sucks

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    moderated...
  • swissenback April 23, 2009 09:25:59
    swissenback

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    Horrific.
    I see all these adamant parents saying that it's the responsible thing to do, to teach "proper" gun usage... to them I say this: think about your children, and ask yourself if you're absolutely positive beyond doubt that your child -CHILD- has the ability to determine what the "appropriate" time/place is to shoot a gun. And then hope it doesn't end up killing the kid.
  • +1 raves
    Connor March 11, 2009 05:12:31
    Connor

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    Proper gun safety should be taught at a young age. This was absolutely the father's fault for not properly locking his firearms up. Just because a kid knows how to use a gun, doesn't mean he should have access to one whenever necessary.
  • +2 raves
    Ev March 08, 2009 00:48:55
    Ev

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    only if properly supervised and trained
  • +1 raves
    wassie February 09, 2009 15:24:10
    wassie

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    Yes but only after the age of 12 and a restricted size of gun(.308 maximum)
  • SIMPLY STUPID January 07, 2009 16:06:17
    SIMPLY STUPID

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    THERE ARE AGE LIMITATIONS FOR WEAPON PURCHASE/USE FOR A REASON. THERE IS NO LEGITIMATE REASON FOR A CHILD TO BE USING ANY TYPE OF GUN WITH EXCEPTION TO TOYS.
  • killerace56 December 23, 2008 18:05:46 (edited)
    killerace56

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    no way should a kid be able to handle armed weapons. they should be atleast 18 years or older to use a firearm.

    im not sure where, but at a gun convention, a 9 year old child was allowed to shoot an uzi..... the backfire made the gun fly back, so the kid shot himself in the face............
  • mojo-jojo December 23, 2008 17:03:58
    mojo-jojo

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    no kid under the age of 18 should be able to handle a gun they are putting themselves and others around them in danger.
  • xXKaylaXKriptoniteXLOVESXEr... December 23, 2008 08:50:05
    xXKaylaXKriptoniteXLOVESXErikXx

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    stupid parents.
  • ronny December 07, 2008 19:41:28
    ronny

    Undecided

    moderated...
  • Libertarian Right December 03, 2008 01:10:19
    Libertarian Right

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    moderated...
  • +1 raves
    Jolie December 02, 2008 05:38:36
    Jolie

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    Children at 8, 9..., they don't know how to control their feelings yet, like anger, jealousy...! You think they can handle a gun? Why not give them the driving license, and let them drive a vehicle and see what kind of harm they can bring again?
    It's totally parents’ responsibility, to watch over the kids, while they’re children, and while they are in their house.
    Safety first please!!!
    vehicle harm totally parents responsibility watch kids children house safety
  • +1 raves
    Ev Jolie March 08, 2009 01:12:08
    Ev
    We have those who are responsible and those who are not. I don't think age is necessarily a factor in determining how capable one is of handling emotion.

    When it comes to weapons, responsible training and supervision is necessary.

    How many 16 year olds die in car accidents every year because the powers that be deem them responsible enough to be driving?

    What about criminals over the age of 16? There's a lot more involved here than someone's age.
  • +1 raves
    jc December 01, 2008 15:16:20 (edited)
    jc

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    It is a sport like any other.Pops took me out shotting when I was 6. I had heard about this from my girlfriend a while back.His father's girlfriend disciplined the little boy while the father stood and watched.I guess the boy resented that. We have all resented our parents a time or two while growing up.Something is wrong with this kid .An average person does not snap like that.If he committed such a horrible act at age 8,imagine what he would do as an adult?He should be held accountable for his actions.
  • +2 raves
    B4dw159 November 22, 2008 17:32:45
    B4dw159

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    Children are curious. Don't teach them and they will shoot one of their friends or themselves, playing with your gun while you are not around. If children are taught that firearms are not toys, just like touching a stove burner, they will leave it alone.
  • +1 raves
    SHER November 22, 2008 16:27:10
    SHER

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    I still believe that children need to be taught about guns and gun safety. I was taught to shoot at a very young age with my Grandpa. I loved target practice. As for killing an animal or a human being, I could only do that if I was in danger or starving to death. Ignorning guns, just keeps ignorant about how to handle them and when to. Young children do not need to be around guns. They wouldn't understand.
  • Sadie November 22, 2008 08:32:15
    Sadie

    Undecided

    They should because it could help the child protect themselves if they ever were in danger but children make mistakes and could easily hurt someone without thinking.
  • +1 raves
    Rocky8807 November 20, 2008 18:52:38
    Rocky8807

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    I dont believe this little boy could have possibly shot daddy and friend with the gun. look at the picture he cant even hold it let alone aim it on his own! come on. yes i realize that kids do kill parents but I dont believe this one for one bit. and isn't the gun a one shot... your telling me that the boy could aim it that well to just kill them both in one shot.. maybe mommy had helped the boy aim the gun... just like daddy is doing in this picture.
  • +1 raves
    xxxemobabyxxx November 19, 2008 02:43:34
    xxxemobabyxxx

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    i think we should be allowed guns, only if we are over the age of 13. and we would probally need to pass tests, and get a licence. and i think we probally shouldnt be walking around with them.
  • +1 raves
    alicia November 19, 2008 00:38:56
    alicia

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    the world has got crazy and angry they need to be taught early and guns need to be put up by their parents
  • +3 raves
    Backlashjack November 18, 2008 12:58:55
    Backlashjack

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    God I Hate Liberals!
    I was shooting at the boys age and because of that am quite proficient. I have NEVER illegally killed anyone. I respected firearms at a young age as all children/ people should.
  • TripMarz555 November 18, 2008 01:12:13
    TripMarz555

    Undecided

    I am undecided on the issue.... more to the point exactly in the middle.
  • +2 raves
    mobilemarvel November 17, 2008 20:21:01
    mobilemarvel

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    Although the picture for this answer is stupid, because children will not be learning how to handle rocket launching mechanisms, it IS important to teach them the safety aspects of handling a firearm. Ask yourself this question: What does a child do when they are interested in something, yet have been prevented from ever being exposed to it? They grow curious. What does a curious child do when he comes across a gun in the trash pile on the way home from school? He picks it up and potentially hurts someone because his parents were too ignorant, dumb or scared to teach that child what to do when they come across a gun.

    Just because you don't have a gun in the house doesn't mean that the punks who commit crimes out there don't ditch their guns after a crime near your house or your child's school. Children need to be aware of what real guns are, what they can do, and how to handle them safely should it become necessary. I have 5 guns in the house, so I bought my son (5) an air rifle so that I can teach him the safety rules of guns without endangering him. He will learn to shoot, because it is a skill that can be used for many things in life.
  • +1 raves
    John Wayne November 17, 2008 06:39:37
    John Wayne

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    I've been using a gun since I was in diapers. Usually a positive early introduction to firearms can instill discipline and respect for firearms. Either the father didn't do good enough a job or the kids a lunatic and was probably going to kill someone eventually anyway (even if it wasn't with a gun). Its not the guns fault its the finger on the trigger.
  • +2 raves
    terr November 17, 2008 04:55:01
    terr

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    You can't set an age minimum or limit for firearms training.( Especially using a freek case like this as a president) People are all different and have different interests,abilities and temperments. I know some grown men who have no business handling a firearm. I started training at 5 years old with a youth 22 rifle from Sears. I taught my three children safe firearm handling and they are now grown responsible people... Why did this boy do this ? We may never know,, I can guarantee he had serious issues to begin with. An 8 year old has the strength to impale you with a knife from the kitchen. So do we debate the age a child can be in the kitchen ? This is not a gun issue . This is an issue of a child with serious mental problems.
  • Smilezzz08 November 17, 2008 03:16:53
    Smilezzz08

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    Children that age are not capable of understanding the importance of safety and the importance of not playing with a gun. Children are killed all too often because of negligent parents who leave guns within harms way for a child to get too.
  • +1 raves
    Mizz Jokerezz November 17, 2008 02:28:30
    Mizz Jokerezz

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    Hell No! Just like in your question, An 8 year old killed father! Omg
  • clynn November 17, 2008 02:14:17
    clynn

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    No children should not be taught how to handle a gun. What purpose would it serve, one such as this Sadness brought about by the idiot who taught this child how to use a gun. Parents and people should let children stay children.
  • sav November 17, 2008 00:05:19
    sav

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    america becomes more and more corrupted every day
  • +1 raves
    AllisonWalker November 16, 2008 22:10:44
    AllisonWalker

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    I think kids 13 and older should be able to handle guns with adult supervision.
  • +1 raves
    VYoung73 November 16, 2008 20:44:36
    VYoung73

    Undecided

    I'm really torn on this issue. I was raised by a hunter, who insisted that I take hunter's safety courses from the time I was 9 years old on. My parents kept our extensive armory under heavy lock and key in a safe in their closet. This I think, is the problem. How accessible are parent's making these weapons? Are they having their children take classes by a licensed professional, or teaching them in the backyard with a budweiser? I personally don't own a gun as an adult, and never will. I am not against people hunting for personal recreation (responsibly of course), but I am against the whole world arming themselves to protect themselves from the other guy who has a gun. Seems like a never ending circle of crap to me. Let's go back to fist fighting, and then see who wins!
  • RealityApologist November 16, 2008 18:59:58
    RealityApologist

    Undecided

    Why was an eight year old teaching his father how to use a gun?
  • sav Reality... November 17, 2008 00:07:46
    sav
    haha the word choice was bad, but the father taught his son to use it
  • +2 raves
    bridge November 16, 2008 17:55:46
    bridge

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    There are many responsible gunowners. If a child is taught to shoot a gun it would be under adult supervision until they reach an age of responsibility. This tragedy was avoidable if the Father had acted as a responsible gun owner.

    In England they are actually talking about banning knives because the rate of knife murders is becoming excessive in the cities. Should we do the same, or should we keep things like this in protected areas, where young irresponsible children can't reach them.

    I know a young woman who recently told my family that as a young girl in high school in Russia, she was taught in school how to dismantle and put back together a Kalashnikov (the Russian version of an AK-47) in 5 minutes. This was fairly recently...not years ago. So I guess you have to assume that the Russians believe their youth should know about guns. Wonder why.

    The 2nd amendment is meant to represent Individual Rights.....that's what the Bill of Rights is all about... individuals. If you dont' want to have a gun, don't. Arrest the people who are using them illegally (who will not obey your gun laws anyway I'm pretty sure). Leave the rest of the law-abiding citizens alone.
  • +1 raves
    Koda ~ McHottie SuperKnight ~ November 16, 2008 17:46:08
    Koda ~ McHottie SuperKnight ~

    Undecided

    glad I never had kids !
  • +2 raves
    Chas November 16, 2008 16:00:45
    Chas

    Yes. Children at this age ___ should be allowed to handle guns.

    My family always had loaded firearms around the house. We were taught to respect the weapon and that it was not a play toy. But then my parents raised us much better then is the norm today. I am glad this kid did not stab them with a steak knife because the liberals would be talking about banning eating utensils.
  • +1 raves
    Walter November 16, 2008 15:24:39
    Walter

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    Maybe a little bit late, but it does help to clean up the gene pool a little.
  • SB247 November 16, 2008 14:41:34
    SB247

    Undecided

    It depends on how the children have been raised.
  • Tastefully Inclined November 16, 2008 11:27:27
    Tastefully Inclined

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    How about a guitar. This instrument wo0uld not hurt any body excluding one's ears.
  • rockmama November 16, 2008 10:23:18
    rockmama

    No. No children should be taught to handle armed weapons.

    You wouldn't teach your child to run with scissors...why teach them to handle something as dangerous as guns?

    This is not a 'safety first' issue and not an accident. this is pre-meditated murder, by an 8 year old. Is it rational to believe the level of forethought that goes into not one, but two murders can be learned in a video game? Yes it is.

    Ours is a culture that is horribly offended by a glimpse of a naked breast (even though most babies are breast fed), but glorifies and perpetuates violence under the sporting guise of 'kill-it-and-grill-it-good-ti... I find it sad.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 15 Next » Last »
or
Cancel