Quantcast

69 children...

Nuggetams 2011/09/08 03:32:15
Related Topics: Twins, Triplets, Birth, 4, 16, twin
You!
Add Photos & Videos
The largest number of children born to one woman is recorded at 69. From 1725-1765, a Russian peasant woman gave birth to 16 sets of twins, 7 sets of triplets, and 4 sets of quadruplets

awesome, or insane??
+11
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Daedalus wqerwqerwe 2011/09/08 23:30:29
    Daedalus
    Make an army of clones when the technology becomes available. =)
    reply
  • pjwinkler65 2011/09/08 04:11:35
    AWESOME!
    pjwinkler65
    Definitely amazing. I can't imagine how her body did it. I guess much stranger things have happened. That poor woman. I most amazing at how she didn't jump off a cliff after about 15.
    reply
  • ImageBandit ~ American Patriot 2011/09/08 04:10:39
    AWESOME!
    ImageBandit ~ American Patriot
    she must have liked it or she wouldnt have continued to have sex
    reply
  • JohnFitzgeral12 2011/09/08 04:08:12
    AWESOME!
    JohnFitzgeral12
    +1
    Ron Burgundy: "How'd you do that? Heck, I'm not even mad; that's amazing."
    reply
  • Anariashki 2011/09/08 04:05:11
    INSANE!
    Anariashki
    +1
    WHY?!
    reply
  • Jaz Killjoy Way 2011/09/08 03:59:48
    INSANE!
    Jaz Killjoy Way
    +1
    OMG Dx
    reply
  • Gracie - Proud Conservative 2011/09/08 03:53:11
    INSANE!
    Gracie - Proud Conservative
    +2
    Wow, crazy!
    reply
  • Nuggetams 2011/09/08 03:52:45
    INSANE!
    Nuggetams
    +3
    i read this on some Random facts website, if it's true or not, who knows, but i do believe it.
    my grandma had 14 kids, all of which survived because they worked at a very young age. so i do believe this could happen:/ i know that 14 is a big difference than 69 but still
    reply
  • Renée♥ 2011/09/08 03:51:12
    INSANE!
    Renée♥
    +2
    wow so if one is missing would she notice
    reply
  • Nuggetams Renée♥ 2011/09/08 03:54:09
    Nuggetams
    +2
    i'd call them, #1 #2 #3....#69 haha
    reply
  • Renée♥ Nuggetams 2011/09/08 03:57:16
    Renée♥
    lol ok
    reply
  • ««zamboni»»Hellsoldier-BN0 2011/09/08 03:50:37
    Undecided
    ««zamboni»»Hellsoldier-BN0
    +1
    BOTH!!!
    reply
  • BAD DOG 2011/09/08 03:50:31
    INSANE!
    BAD DOG
    +2
    I think they could of used alittle 69 activity ~!
    reply
  • Goducks5 BAD DOG 2011/09/08 03:54:05
    Goducks5
    +1
    LMAO!
    reply
  • Comment... BAD DOG 2011/09/08 13:33:33
    Comment Removed
    +1
    That brings a whole new meaning to "yodeling in the canyon." The echo would have been deafening.
    reply
  • Mikayla 2011/09/08 03:49:29 (edited)
    INSANE!
    Mikayla
    too down lol
    reply
  • AvaC 2011/09/08 03:48:58
    INSANE!
    AvaC
    Yep. I read this in the Guinness Book of World Records... Can't remember the year though. :/
    reply
  • Atmara 2011/09/08 03:44:30
    INSANE!
    Atmara
    +2
    Thats the real story of Adam n Eve
    reply
  • iratd 2011/09/08 03:44:18
    INSANE!
    iratd
    +1
    No comment
    reply
  • Goducks5 iratd 2011/09/08 03:53:37
    Goducks5
    +2
    "No comment" is a comment.
    reply
  • iratd Goducks5 2011/09/08 15:31:18
    iratd
    What an ass, both of you, or in other words stupid, to anybody with a brain, "NO COMMENT", speaks for it self.
    reply
  • Goducks5 iratd 2011/09/08 17:41:37
  • Prime Time Lime 2011/09/08 03:43:47
    AWESOME!
    Prime Time Lime
    +5
    69 was just fine.
    70 would be more
    68 is too few
    She must have been sore.
    reply
  • Poet003 2011/09/08 03:43:00
    Undecided
    Poet003
    How many lived? Im not positive I believe this
    reply
  • Fresno State Fan CB-05 2011/09/08 03:42:32
  • Razzy Ratchets 2011/09/08 03:42:15
    AWESOME!
    Razzy Ratchets
    +3
    Awesomely insane! Hmmmm......69, how fitting. Well maybe not. If they stuck to that position more often, they probably would have had less kids.
    reply
  • Dagon 2011/09/08 03:42:13
  • autumn Dagon 2011/09/08 13:57:24 (edited)
    autumn
    +1
    I think he had a say on the matter. I would think they had given it some thought how they would feed those kids. After several kids. Plus I'm sure he had fun making them.
    reply
  • Dagon autumn 2011/09/08 14:48:52
  • Nam Era Vet #1 DNA TLC 2011/09/08 03:41:22
    Undecided
    Nam Era Vet #1 DNA TLC
    +3
    reply
  • OriiG 2011/09/08 03:41:22
    AWESOME!
    OriiG
    +1
    O.o Insane and awesome at the same time! One amazing thing is that she had twins, triplets and quadruplets, Im not sure how she did but it must have been hard specially in the 1700s.
    reply
  • ♀☛I'm~Totally~Иormal☚ 2011/09/08 03:39:51
    Undecided
    ♀☛I'm~Totally~Иormal☚
    Both, but, how much money went to babysitting??
    money babysitting babysitting
    reply
  • alex 2011/09/08 03:39:37
    INSANE!
    alex
    Tall about a magic number HAHAHA! but no, that's crazy.
    reply
  • NicoleBabi 2011/09/08 03:39:02
    INSANE!
    NicoleBabi
    DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMN
    reply
  • Goducks5 2011/09/08 03:37:00
    INSANE!
    Goducks5
    +3
    How did she survived all of those births in the 1700s?
    reply
  • Louis 2011/09/08 03:36:38
    INSANE!
    Louis
    +1
    And I thought 6 was a lot. How about 69? No thank you! 6 69 holy crap
    reply
  • Nuggetams Louis 2011/09/08 03:38:50
    Nuggetams
    +2
    my grandma had 14 haha. i thought that was a lot:D
    reply
  • Louis Nuggetams 2011/09/08 19:42:08
    Louis
    It seems like a lot, but, not when compared to 69!
    reply
  • Deathblooms /m\ 2011/09/08 03:34:50
    INSANE!
    Deathblooms /m\
    OH Hell NOOOOOOO....that is just insane.
    I have 4 of my own plus a step daughter.. that is plenty lmao
    reply
«« First « Prev 1 2

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/24 16:59:35

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals