2012 SI Swimsuit Cover: Too Sexy for Grocery Store Checkout?

SLIDESHOW: SI Swimsuit Cover

• siamusal 2012/03/30 16:08:48
  SI Swimsuit Cover is Too Sexy

  

  +1

  I dont see talking about this when it seems that everybody goes to beach wearing les then what would cover his/her special parts. We seem outdated. Nudity is a fashion arround here

  reply
• Rich Luna 2012/02/16 15:35:03
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +1

  Why censor America?

  reply
• Rebel Yell 2012/02/15 15:55:22
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  Same thing you see on Dancing W/the Stars, except they are giving several interesting poses as they whirl and twirl.

  reply
• toobored54 2012/02/15 15:34:38
  SI Swimsuit Cover is Too Sexy

  

  Man, those funbags are really hangin out. Why even look inside??

  reply
• 7leads 2012/02/15 13:00:46
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  It is fine....not even a problem worth thinking about.

  reply
• David 2012/02/15 12:41:26
  SI Swimsuit Cover is Too Sexy

  

  Definitely should never have seen the light of day on Sodahead, a site which many children visit.

  reply
• Cause Unknown 2012/02/15 05:57:41
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +2

  Seems like an everyday swimsuit that people wear at the beach or a pool. It would be sexier if it didn't reveal as much skin. Too indecent? I've seen much worse at Wal-Mart.

  reply
• v i o l e t 2012/02/15 05:24:05 (edited)
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +1

  I don't like the cover as much and it does show off more bare chest than I'd like. Because I think it would more sexy if she didn't show so much. But overall I don't think it's that bad.
  
  An overreaction to it because you're a dad of girls. There's just somethings people have no control over and the only thing we can do is adjust.

  reply
• mark 2012/02/15 03:08:56 (edited)
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  There is still room for imagination. Albeit , not much.

  reply
• opie 2012/02/15 03:06:07
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  there is no such thing as too sexy

  reply
• Lee The Hybrid Snowflake 2012/02/15 03:00:45
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  I think the cover is ok but maybe a little too sexy for the checkout at the grocery store. Sex sells, my children get a magazine called Gameinformre, it's a videogame magazine but I have to be honest I threw a few of them in the garbage because I thought they were a little racey for boys.

  reply
• SteveMarine- JLA 2012/02/15 02:16:54
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  It's no worse then seeing a bunch of gays wearing leather and feathers walking thru down town in a parade... Or some nasty crap like that...

  reply
• Jonatha... to SteveMa... 2012/06/23 13:50:58
  

  I don't see how...or are you saying because a gay person would see that cover and be disgusted, just like you are for something as silly as....someone wearing leather and feathers? If you really are a marine, I'm disappointed in the armed forces as a whole.

  reply
• Jonatha... to Jonatha... 2012/06/23 13:51:43
  

  (And to finish that off...most gay people wouldn't really CARE either way. Or at least the gay people I know >.>)

  reply
• gregaj7 2012/02/15 01:16:48 (edited)
  SI Swimsuit Cover is Too Sexy

  

  Like the rest of such mags (GQ, Maxim, etc), they'll put a "cover" over most of the mag, but leave about 2" from the top so folk can see the title. Porn is a HUGE Spiritual problem in this country, and needs to be destroyed.

  reply
• EllE to gregaj7 2012/02/15 01:42:44
  

  "Porn is a HUGE Spiritual problem in this country, and needs to be destroyed."
  
  GQ & Maxim considered porn? Yea, "destroy"/burn it, put women in burkas! )))

  reply
• mark to EllE 2012/02/15 03:05:05
  

  

  reply
• EllE to mark 2012/02/15 05:11:28
  

  +1

  

  reply
• gregaj7 to EllE 2012/02/15 04:49:41
  

  The 'softer' side. Burqas? Maybe you'd prefer the harder mags to be sold at the check-out counter of your local Safeway?

  reply
• EllE to gregaj7 2012/02/15 05:37:32 (edited)
  

  So, GQ & Maxim are "soft porn"? And have to be "destroyed"?
  I see. Do you have a problem with freedom & women in bikinis?
  Maxim, etc. - placed in magazine section & women in bikinis, etc. are covered, if they are in check-out section. Actually It's surprised me in US.
  I used to see topless magazines in Europe, but it's not only that, political correctness, TSA, gov. healthcare, gov. school system with propaganda, etc.
  How free is your country if you have almost the same amount of freedom as people had in the USSR? And here we go... let's destroy more freedoms, to be more "spiritual" & secure?
  
  
  “Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”
  - Thomas Jefferson
  
  "America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
  - Abraham Lincoln

  reply
• gregaj7 to EllE 2012/02/15 05:41:45
  

  Clearly we're not seeing this the same. Enjoy.

  reply
• EllE to gregaj7 2012/02/15 06:22:29
  

  +1

  Indeed. )

  reply
• hari 2012/02/14 23:57:59
  SI Swimsuit Cover is Too Sexy

  

  ya the bulging should not be noticed while u go for shop

  reply
• Pat 2012/02/14 23:57:30
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +1

  Much ado about nothing. I think it's fine compared to some things we see.

  reply
• Kashee 2012/02/14 23:36:00
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +2

  At least she has her top on.
  I've never seen Sports Illustrated in our check out line here. It's with the rest of the magazines.

  reply
• MW121 2012/02/14 23:01:20
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +1

  Perfecto

  reply
• Sofahead 2012/02/14 22:56:19 (edited)
  SI Swimsuit Cover is Too Sexy

  

  +1

  While think it's way too revealing, I think the average copy of National Enquirer, People or Self are by their cover stories worse.

  reply
• Steve J~PWCM~JLA 2012/02/14 22:24:04
  SI Swimsuit Cover is Too Sexy

  

  +2

  Interestingly, the models had more meat as well. Now it is skin and bones.

  reply
• Verbal 2012/02/14 22:08:25
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +4

  This country needs to relax

  reply
• jere.chievres 2012/02/14 22:07:26
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +3

  If you don't like it, look away is all you need to do.

  reply
• rand 2012/02/14 22:02:55
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +2

  I don't worry about children seeing nudity, and once they're old enough to feel sexual urges, they'll see it one way or another. I do object to provocative poses though. Nudity is natural, whereas seduction in general public is not...typically.

  reply
• none 2012/02/14 21:56:06
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +4

  It looks fine to me and if you think it's too sexy for the grocery store you'd better never think about going to the beach.

  reply
• Tara-ABO-2012 2012/02/14 21:55:34
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +3

  Not much different then if you were at the beach. But then again skin has never bothered me... I guess if it bothers you, don't buy it, don't look at it and don't go to the beach or other public swimming areas :-)

  reply
• Red_Horse 2012/02/14 21:53:38
• ElliPonto 2012/02/14 21:47:55
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +2

  No more then
  
  
  or
  
  
  
  or
  
  

  reply
• EllE to ElliPonto 2012/02/14 22:28:26 (edited)
  

  +1

  Naked Pregnant or Ugly are ok, but beautiful - no way!!! )))

  reply
• ElliPonto to EllE 2012/02/15 15:39:05
  

  +1

  Not saying the naked Pregnant is ugly. My point is they are wearing less than the SI Swinsuit Covers.

  reply
• kcandi 2012/02/14 21:38:37
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +4

  She's covered.....kinda. Don't like it don't look is my opinion.

  reply
• keeper 2012/02/14 21:37:07
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +4

  Fine by me, but I am a guy!

  reply
• EllE 2012/02/14 21:28:02 (edited)
  SI Swimsuit Cover is OK

  

  +9

  What inappropriate or offensive can be about woman in a swimsuit? ))) In Europe you can see even topless. )))
  
  I prefer covering this BS:
  
  
  
  

  reply