Would you rather have a closet-homosexual in the White House than a closet-Muslim or, in the case of Barack Hussein Obama, both?

Because at least he would have no sympathy for the crew that flew airplanes into buildings.

Obama IS BOTH Homosexual and Islamic.

I'm pretty sure he's not a Muslim or a homosexual...nice try though. Maybe you shouldn't let everything you hear influence your opinion on people. Where's the "This Question is Too Biased to Even be a Question" option?

And why can't you just take it in stride? The only choice of opinion that matters is yours all the sudden?

I don't believe I said that, now did I? This question is extremely biased with no other choice besides an offensive, biased one. Are those the only opinions that matter, the ones of the question asker? No, I didn't think so.

I hear you, I'm just saying if the topic didn't have your response, why not just go to another? I'm just curious to what you're trying to prove is all.

I'm not trying to prove anything

Truth be told I would be a tad sad they would hide it, since when did we become a country where people must hide their religious beliefs or their sexual orientation? Are you telling me we have now become a country who judges others for the god they believe in and the person they love. I weep for our country if that is how we've become.

I weep for our country if that is how we've become.

Become? That's like saying I weep for Catholicism being that's how Catholic they've become. The USA has ALWAYS been apprehensive towards homosexuality. Change may not be a bad idea, but to say that we are going backwards is a loogie in the face to a LOT of homosexual movement leaders.

You're right, I misspoke and ended up having my comment have a finality in it. There has been a good amount of head way reiterate, It saddens me that this still goes on in this country of ours. Better?

..are your questions where stupid goes to die??

You are really an idiot. You ask some of the dumbest questions I have ever seen and have some of the dumbest answers. It is no wonder conservatives are destroying the country. Look at the kind of stuff you are interested in. To tell you the truth as long as they are not conservative, I don't care who is in the White House. I would prefer that they are athiest too but as long as they are liberal, I am happy.

Kinda funny that the only "choice" you libs give is the choices you've already made, including the choice of opinion. God forbid someone conjures an opposing opinion against a liberal, they're then put on a hit-list and called terrorists.

Thankfully the liberal laundry is starting to air out and the entire world is seeing it for the hateful, bigoted, and freedom-hating party that it is.

Let me guess, I don't have a right to that opinion or to post that the lib laundry is being aired out? So poetic.

You can make up and believe anything you want to. It is too bad you are a FOX viewer and therefore totally uninformed about anything. You are a racist and homophobe, just 2 of the things that are destroying our country.

I don't understand what "liberal laundry" you are refering to but I can assure you that there are many more problems in the conservative camp. Mit Romney is a Mormon which I consider to be a pretty bad religion. I am thankfull that the election is in November so Obama can win and I can hear you and Rush Limbaugh crying for another 4 years.

And you know, I have heard idiots declaring Obama to be a muslum, and I have heard people complain that he is a Christian associated with Reverand Right but I have never heard anyone ever claim that he was a closeted homosexual. After looking at Romney, and as homophobic as he is, I think he is hiding something and it won't surprise me at all when his gay lovers start coming out of the woodwork.

Either would be preferable to allowing another inept Republican into the White House.

No Republican exists that would match the ineptness of the illegal alien with the fake birth certificate in the White House now.

You're not fooling anyone. Every Republican candidate is living proof that evolution can and frequently does go in reverse.

Yeah, it is the liberals that have proven that the IQ scale can have negative integers too.

Sadly, it's the conservatives who continually resist intellectual evolution.

Thanks for the invitation, but I'm not going to help you try to validate your out-of-context BS. Instead, why don't we discuss how little forwards progress has been achieved with the Republican Congressional majority running things? Or, maybe how the Teabaggerish incumbent reps in Congress had promised to fight anything proposed by President Obama before he had even set foot in the Oval Office? Does the name Mitch McConnell ring a bell? Let's discuss how we were forced to change from an effective, single-payer health reform plan that and would have been an ideal start for health reform, ended up being over-compromised and watered down to being basically a gift to the insurance industry in order to appease the RWNJs in the Party of NO in both houses.

Feel free to pick a spot to start and then lets discuss and then determine which of the two meet the actual definition of insanity

Out of curiosity, how is anything about the NDAA taken out of context -- or those executive orders -- or the alliance with the NWO ; oops I mean the UN -- or the treaty with China? I must admit that my curiosity is over-peaked because the references I was making to them are already making large impacts in our society -- as in, people being arrested (NDAA & China Pact) and farmer's crops being seized. Is this simply over-exaggeration on MSNBC's part? It seems as of late, the only thing I've been hearing from many dems is "yeah, well I'm not voting for him!" or "I didn't know he would do this!" (its even coming from the star Democrat, Bill Clinton for God's sake lol) but "out of context" is a first.

Also, since when did you loose the memo that the Democrats were still in charge of the Senate, Supreme Court, and Executive Offices? Its really hard to blame teabaggers here when they only have a pinkey-toe in the door ;)

Every president has signed an NDAA. Every president has signed similar executive orders The NWO is a product of the broken minds of conspiracy theorists. It's not too hard to blame the teabaggers when they announce publicly that their mission is to stop any progress made by President Obama. That's called obstructionism. And, that's the proper context..

Hopefully the gay fellow (or gal) wouldn't have the destruction of our Republic as an agenda.

Because neither sexual preference or religious beliefs alone will dictate the intelligence or the decisions most people make. Plenty of "gay" and "religious" politicians currently hold an elected position. Oh, wait, maybe that's why congress is so messed up. ;-)

One's sexual orientation doesn't make for anti-American agendas, but being a Muslim does.

hmm... I would disagree with you there... surprise. lol

SOME radical/extremist Muslims can be against American ideals... as has been proven.

1.5 billion people are not against the US. There are plenty who believe in peace and are intelligent enough to know when to take things metaphorically.

That is just not true, and you have been sorely mislead. I was stationed right in the middle of this Islam vs Everyone-Else mess, and even moderate Islams will follow sharia if there is no resistance around them.

The test is really simple: Ask any Muslim to denounce a radical Islamic group. None ever will.

A Christian will denounce a radical in a heart-beat - they'll even sentence them to death. Jeremiah Wright -- nuff said.

Hmmm What is not true? That 1.5 billion Muslims don't want to do us harm?

I guess your vast experience makes you the SH expert on religion. ;-)

OK then. You can continue the hate, war, and killing because that works so well to solve the problems... I'll continue with the lowly compassion and tolerance.

I wish you the best.

That 1.5 billion Muslims don't want to do us harm?

It is really hard to tell if they do or do not without that test being that their texts and teaching tells them to deceive and strike where possible against unbelievers.

I'll continue with the lowly compassion and tolerance.

There were three American boys that thought the same as you and to prove it they went to Iraq for a tour of the country. They were captured, tortured, and killed. By all means, keep being tolerant and living that sheltered life you're living and I'll keep being cautious.

Being Muslim is the same thing as being a christian or a jew. It is a religious belief. Contrary to what you idiotic neo-cons think, it is written in the constitution that in the US people have the right to practice whatever religion they are stupid enough to want to follow. From what I gather you are a dumb christian who believes in an invisible man in the sky. The freedom of religion and from religion is one of the most important rights in the constitution.

You know, being Atheist is the same as being a Muslim -- you both are just as intolerate and vicious to other beliefs. Oh and I'll give you $1,000.00 if you can quote where the constitution states "FREEDOM FROM RELIGION". I believe we both know this is another liberal lie.

But I am humbled at how the Supreme Court lately declared Atheism a religion in the United States and that how it is a protected practice which also means that the "lack of" religious artifacts around government buildings can in the future be construed as an Atheist symbol and that the government is bestowing favor to Atheist. You got what you asked for buddy.

Kinda funny you say that - every liberal on the planet right now is attacking Mitt Romney because of his religion. Ahh the logic of liberals ceases to amaze.

LOL... that's a lot of liberals. I think you may be watching too much TV or listening to too much radio. Haven't you learned that it only serves to brainwash and perpetuate the same old division. Oops... no I remember you.

I wish you the best.

Its the truth. Some anti-Mitt rally they had were out there poking fun at the Mormons by all being dressed in "Long-Johns". I honest believe that Mormons are evil :P -- but he is free to believe as he wishes so long as those beliefs do not promote violence and civil unrest.

None of the above.

Yeah, we know that. But the question is framed to pick the "least-worst" candidate.

And with no other choice I did.