Quantcast

Why are liberals so stupid?!

Dana 2010/09/25 23:00:16
Liberals are very stupid because they support evil things!
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • David Sawyer 2012/05/08 17:51:52
    David Sawyer
    +4
    Liberals are full of contradictions and paradoxes. They accuse Conservatives of this and that but liberals are total hypocrites.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • The Aging Yankee Liberal Do... 2013/02/21 06:49:34
    The Aging Yankee Liberal Douche
    +1
    what do we support that's evil?
  • Scandalf The Agi... 2013/02/21 21:26:02
    Scandalf
    SURPRISE BUTTSECTS?

    I support it :)
  • American☆Atheist 2013/02/20 22:41:30
    American☆Atheist
    Support freedom is not evil
  • Big Al 2013/02/11 03:43:59
    Big Al
    Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless. If you listen to the liberal rhetoric, you might think Barack Obama was a black Republican being surrounded by a KKK lynching party 100 years ago -- as opposed to the single most powerful man in America abusing the authority of his office to attack ordinary Tea Parties who have the audacity to speak the truth to power for the good of their country....another name for this ideology is Socialism
  • The Voice of Rock 2012/09/06 17:03:35
    The Voice of Rock
    Getting a liberal to understand the most basic concept of reality is like trying to get a down syndrome victim to comprehend finite math and quantum mechanics
  • Scandalf The Voi... 2012/09/06 21:11:48
    Scandalf
    Who knows? He might understand quantum mechanics!
    Susskind mentioned something about the limits of ordinary human logic to comprehend nanoscopic reality...
  • The Voice of Rock 2012/09/06 16:58:58
    The Voice of Rock
    +1
    The belief structure in liberalism attracts those who are mentally deficient (avg IQ is 100),uneducated(95 percent of ALL liberals have an education level of GED or less), the lazy,shiftless, and hopeless( 80 percent of all liberals make less than 8.12/hr/food stamps/welfare/wic),inspired and unmotivated. Its for people that are too lazy to be self sufficient so they blame everyone else and want everything handed to them ..Here endeth the lesson in FACT and REALITY
  • Scandalf 2012/07/23 12:31:30
    Scandalf
    +3
    Because it takes a very stupid guy to argue with an even dumber Conservative.
  • Scandalf Scandalf 2012/07/23 12:41:37
    Scandalf
    +1
    Reading these posts, I'm starting to think that some "Conservatives" and some "Liberals" are really just trolls...
  • Stumpie Scandalf 2012/08/21 20:40:52
    Stumpie
    +1
    You make it too easy for a 'stupid' Conservative like me to make you look all the dumber! Liberals ARE stupid due to the fact that they cannot or will not answer a question with fact. When facts are given to a liberal, they tend (not always) to get very very angry, tell the, oh so dumb Conservative, that the facts just do not matter. OR that the facts just given are made up! I could say "the sky is very blue today" and then, midst the cursing, name calling and other nasty words, the liberal would say "only from your point of view"...darn the fact that the sky is blue........
  • Scandalf Stumpie 2012/08/22 11:19:16
    Scandalf
    "midst the cursing, name calling and other nasty words"
    Is the only thing I hear from these two factions.
    You're right, I just made a funny stupid statement, troll style.
    Sorry.
  • The Voi... Scandalf 2012/09/06 17:00:17
    The Voice of Rock
    +1
    And you are obviously illiterate to begin with.. Your break is over there is lettuce to be chopped and fries to be made at your paper hat and mop career. Dolt
  • Scandalf The Voi... 2012/09/06 21:13:26
    Scandalf
    "Your break is over there is lettuce to be chopped and fries to be made at your paper hat and mop career."
    You are hilarious! I love you :)
  • David Sawyer 2012/05/08 17:51:52
    David Sawyer
    +4
    Liberals are full of contradictions and paradoxes. They accuse Conservatives of this and that but liberals are total hypocrites.
  • Stumpie David S... 2012/08/21 20:41:30
    Stumpie
    You forgot angry, spiteful, hateful and liars.
  • David Sawyer 2012/05/08 17:50:30
  • Kyle Hill 2011/08/18 07:17:27
    Kyle Hill
    +1
    Why is it that whenever a Liberal tries to defend themselves all they do is try to bend (insert topic here) with name calling and/or being sarcastic without actually giving a thoughtful answer where conservatives always have thoughtful posts and no name calling?

    Seriously I have NEVER seen ONE conservative on any forum name call and if they do it's always the Liberal's being sarcastic first instead of providing some food for thought and liberal posts always have a negative energy vibration to them as the *law of attraction* states or the "You reap what you sow" in the bible.

    Liberals are so negative with thoughts of violence against conservatives while claiming they wish crime would go down without guns around. Isn't pushing someone down the stairs a violent crime as well?

    Why is it okay to push a conservative down the stairs without your sorry ass falling too?

    If you think that conservative was so mean then you should try falling down the stairs to see what it's like before you shout stuff off feeling invincible behind the keyboard.

    That conservative deserves at the very least a soft pad during his trip down the stairs. *Puts out soft pad on the landings*


    Now that I think about it why do they call it *keyboards* when it's not a board and it has nothing to do with keys?
  • goarmy18 2011/05/19 22:34:04
    goarmy18
    +4
    Liberals should really open thier eyes once in a while. They really need to understand that people who aren't leagally in this contry aren't paying taxes, therefore not doing thier fair share as an American. The thing that makes me the most angry about some liberals is how they seem to easily forget that the soldiers who are "murdering" innocent people overseas are fighting for them too!
  • Kyle Hill goarmy18 2011/08/18 07:18:47
    Kyle Hill
    +3
    They cannot see the forest for it's trees though actually it's more like "Do as I say" and not as I do.
  • liz.cha... Kyle Hill 2014/06/10 04:51:58
    liz.chartier.754
    +3
    That is not a human possibility.
  • onemanfunplan 2011/01/19 15:09:07
    onemanfunplan
    +1
    Because they have abandoned the ability to think for themselves as they let the mainstream media (MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC) dictate how they FEEL about any intellectual subject. In addition, they throw the baby out with the bath water by allowing their emotions and feelings to dictate every decision they make as any attempt at logical reasoning takes a perennial back seat.
  • Rick 2010/10/21 22:36:01
    Rick
    +1
    It takes all kinds, I suppose. The most annoying thing about liberals is that they are totally disconnected from reality. Take economics, for example. They don't seem to understand that you can't spend more money than you take in without running into financial problems of some kind. Now I realize it's possible to live your life with a certain amount of ongoing debt, such as a mortgage and car payments, etc., as long as you can cover the payments and don't get behind. But if you keep increasing your debt level to the point where you cannot keep up with the payments, you will become insolvent, or bankrupt. The same is true for individual people or a government entity. Liberals think the government can spend and spend without limit. Libs never seem to offer an explanation for this. They dance around the issue, sling some mud and do some name-calling, but they can never explain why they think it's okay for the federal government to spend us into oblivion. If it was bad when Bush did it, why is it okay for Obama and his thugs to do it even more?
  • Alexand... Rick 2012/02/10 04:40:17
    Alexander Klick
    +2
    The things you seem to not understand are
    1. most of the debt run up by the federal government over the past 30 years has been caused by republicans, not democrats. Regan greatly increased spending and cut taxes expanding the deficit, Clinton balanced the budget and ended up with a surplus. If you count the bush tax cuts (1.3 trillion since 2001), 2 wars (1.5 trillion est.), the senior prescription drug benefits (1 trillion since 2004) signed by bush, and you add them all up, you will see that Obama has added far less to the debt (and current deficit) than Bush jr did. Most of Obama's deficit (aside from Bush's spending increases/ tax decreases) has been caused by a. the recession and b. stimulus/tarp spending.
    2. Our country could in theory borrow as much money as we wanted. This is because we are the printer of our own money, meaning that in order to pay our debts we can simply print more money. Sounds crazy right? No, in fact the federal reserve "creates" new money every day in order to maintain stable interest rates. If the federal government needs money, all it has to do is sell treasury bonds, then the federal reserve conducts open market purchases of the bonds, since direct purchase by the fed of gov bonds is illegal. This gives the government the money it n...



    The things you seem to not understand are
    1. most of the debt run up by the federal government over the past 30 years has been caused by republicans, not democrats. Regan greatly increased spending and cut taxes expanding the deficit, Clinton balanced the budget and ended up with a surplus. If you count the bush tax cuts (1.3 trillion since 2001), 2 wars (1.5 trillion est.), the senior prescription drug benefits (1 trillion since 2004) signed by bush, and you add them all up, you will see that Obama has added far less to the debt (and current deficit) than Bush jr did. Most of Obama's deficit (aside from Bush's spending increases/ tax decreases) has been caused by a. the recession and b. stimulus/tarp spending.
    2. Our country could in theory borrow as much money as we wanted. This is because we are the printer of our own money, meaning that in order to pay our debts we can simply print more money. Sounds crazy right? No, in fact the federal reserve "creates" new money every day in order to maintain stable interest rates. If the federal government needs money, all it has to do is sell treasury bonds, then the federal reserve conducts open market purchases of the bonds, since direct purchase by the fed of gov bonds is illegal. This gives the government the money it needs to stay solvent, and the interest earned on the bonds is paid back by the fed to the federal government.

    I agree that a running deficit for our country is not a good thing, and will eventually start to prohibit growth. However, it would be foolish for us to cut back on government spending during a recession. To do so would put more people out of work, further exacerbating the current recession. This is a big reason that Obama has cut payroll taxes and not increased taxes, because we need as much disposable income and spending as possible to help restore the demand in order to bring back more jobs. The long term recovery is more important than the short term deficit. It is important to reestablish growth (on which Obama's record isn't bad, 2.8% growth in gdp for each of the last 2 years (better than each of bush's last 3 years, with an economic up cycle) and more jobs created in 2 years than under bush's 8) because if we can establish growth, then the debt becomes less significant, as our net wealth increases.

    There are many more very complicated economic issues that pertain to our current economic climate. I would be happy to discuss them with you if you want.
    (more)
  • Rick Alexand... 2012/02/14 04:32:16
  • bgirardo Alexand... 2012/03/10 04:36:24
    bgirardo
    +4
    Interesting twist on history. Quick question - who controls the money in this country, the President or the House ... (trick question I know ... but it's actually the House!)

    So, who controlled the House under Regan (I'll give you a hint - Tip O'Neill) ... and who controlled the House under Clinton (another hint ... Newt). So - the base premise that it's the Executive who spends money is pretty silly (I'll even let the current President off the hook). Look at Congress for spending, not the Executive.

    As to your 2nd point ... yes, the Treasury can print as much money as it wishes ... however, do you know what hyper-inflation is? Did you know that in 1980 Zimbabwe's dollar traded on par with the US dollar? Did you also know that just prior to abandoning their currency in 2009 they were printing a 10 Trillion dollar note (yes - that's correct, a $10,000,000,000,000.00 note). Imagine your Social Security Benefits, your Life Savings and your earnings all becoming worthless - just because your government printed money.

    So Alexander ... I would strongly suggest that you do a little digging into History ... and look at what other countries have experienced prior to offering a solution as simple as "Turn on the Presses" ... ;-)
  • Mike Mac bgirardo 2012/04/30 14:12:28
    Mike Mac
    +1
    that explains why we can not get a budget now, because of the Republicans, right?
  • debbie Alexand... 2012/04/10 07:21:40 (edited)
    debbie
    +3
    Actually the reason Clintons era did so well with our budget is because although while he was president, congress was made up of mostly republicans and they are the ones that got the budget balanced. By the time Bush got going dems took over congress & screwed it all up. Now we are back to having a dem president with majority republican senate & congess so obama will get credit for everything the repubs fix. Its a stupid vicious cycle that certain people don't seem to notice
  • Kirk Mo... Alexand... 2012/05/28 08:51:22
    Kirk Morris
    +1
    LOL!!!! You really need to look at your "facts"!
  • Stumpie Alexand... 2012/08/21 20:43:22
    Stumpie
    Explain how A) Clinton balanced a budget with a Republican Congress B) balanced the budget with 500 billion in debt C) Raised taxes up the butt?
  • liz.cha... Alexand... 2014/06/10 05:04:43
    liz.chartier.754
    +3
    No that is not true Clinton had a ten year plan to reduce the budget and that never happened. As far as Obama spending less that is far less than factual. It was the democrat majority that insisted the need for a bailout that money was never spent by bush it was spent by Obama and the democrats. I would love to know where all this misinformation comes from?
    Bush issued a veto threat on the bloated spending bills pending in Congress in late 2008. CQ estimated that the final spending bill “provided about $31 billion more in discretionary funding than was included in the fiscal 2008 versions of the nine bills” which is “about $19 billion more than Bush sought.” I would argue that Obama gets credit for the whole $31 billion in new spending. The most damning fact from the CQ piece is that “Bush had threatened to veto spending bills that exceeded his request.”

    Now one can argue that even $31 billion is a drop in the bucket when one considers that spending went from $2.98 trillion to $3.52 trillion. Much of the spike in increased spending is on the mandatory spending side, and much of it can be attributed to President Obama.
  • Popanator 2010/10/21 09:56:19
  • onebad 2010/10/21 04:38:30
  • Stumpie onebad 2012/08/21 20:47:31
    Stumpie
    Really, do you need an explanation of what they mean?
    a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done.

    Hmmm, taxing those who work and giving to those who do not? Shall I refer you to the IRS website on the 50% who pay no fed income tax? Or the fact that the top 15% pays 85% of all taxes? I doubt you'd understand, however it is a fact.
  • Scott 2010/09/26 00:00:59
    Scott
    +3
    I see you've been a sodahead for all of one hour. Glorious beginning. Liberals are usually derided for being intellectual elitists. You know, the Harvard and Yale types. Whereas conservatives are usually associated with such highbrow thinkers as Sarah Palin, George Bush, and Strom Thurmond. Not to mention the good ole boss hog, southern troglodytes There is a reason the GOP is referred to as the evil empire, They support torture, warmongering, corporate greed, gay bashing, Mexican bashing, poor bashing, and so on. You think abortion is evil. I think forcing women to bear unwanted children is evil. Liberals are not stupid, they just have different views from myopic bible thumpers. Please tell me if you need definitions for any of the terms I utilized. I can see from your post that your vocabulary is limited.
    conservatives Pictures, Images and Photos
    conservatives Pictures, Images and Photos
  • sweetpe... Scott 2010/09/26 00:33:30
    sweetpepper
    +2
    I see that you so very nicely have proven her point...............thanks. LOL
  • onebad sweetpe... 2010/10/21 04:41:14
  • bgirardo onebad 2012/03/10 04:40:22
    bgirardo
    +4
    Again - with the name calling and insults. Thank you for proving our point!
  • liz.cha... sweetpe... 2014/06/10 15:32:05
    liz.chartier.754
    The reality is that is the liberal jumping off the cliff thing and has nothing to do with conservatives
  • Dana Scott 2010/10/12 21:23:53
    Dana
    +3
    Typical liberal response! How is all that hope and change working for you? ;-)
  • onebad Dana 2010/10/21 04:55:13

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Fun

2014/12/21 06:15:39

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals