Who would you rather have as a Thanksgiving dinner guest, Barack Obama, Lady Gaga or Tim Tebow?

I applaud you,sir, for having the audacity (or, if you prefer, balls) to insult not only one man based on one fact alone, but also an enormous group of millions of people for the same, sole reason. My discreditation of you, however, is several fold. Partly based on the fact that one's religion has nothing to do with their sanity. Partly based on the fact that (I assume) you have no qualification that deems you capable of making such a statement and it being regarded as true (please no "comebacks" such as "I got my degree from the university of beating your *%#", or anything of the sort). And partly based on the fact that creationism (the science of Christianity) has never been disproven, which is more than may be said for the theory (pay attention to that word, friend) of evolution. "Outrageous!' you might say, for how could a mere 16 year old boy from West Virginia possibly have evidence against the theory of evolution? The answer, in case you really were wondering, is intellect. 1) I, nor anybody else, have ever found evidence of the magic that supposedly caused the big bang, however there is also no scientific evidence that God exists, so we'll call that a wash. 2) A T-Rex, dated (by evolutionists) to be 68 million years old, was unearthed in Montana; there's just a few little problems: not all of the bones were fossilized, soft tissue was still intact, DNA was found, and red blood cells were clearly visible. If you have an explanation as to how they could have possibly survived 68 million years, I would honestly love to hear it. 3) Radiometric dating is ridiculously unreliable. When dating an object you (evolutionists) assume (thus making everything an extremely unreliable theory) that every single condistion in the universe has remained the exact same as it is now throughout history, and that the object which you are dating has not been changed or effected by any of these changes (which have happened) in any way, shape, or form. You also do not know the amounts of any of the substances within the object, or any substances that the object may have lost or gained over time; you also can't make a hypothesis, as that must be an educated guess, the best you can do is pick a number between one and infinity. 4) Vestigial organs. If they were indeed useless, they should be gone by now. 5) Crippling lack of transitional fossils.

Now, I'm going to hope that you are, indeed, an evolutionist, if not, then just say you are so I don't feel as if I wasted my time. Haha