Burning the Flag is something that is defended by the Supreme Court categorized under Freedom of Speech.
Book burning has a negative connotation from previous events in history. There's nothing more offensive than someone trying to keep a person or group of persons ignorant and in the dark about the horrors and joys of life and history. Book burning is an attempt to control.
Whats more offensive? Burning Books or Burning the Flag?
Jiorgia
2012/06/10 01:16:04
Please provide an explanation for your opinion.
Top Opinion
-
Katherine the Renaissance W... 2012/06/10 21:06:58Burning Books





















Now there are a bunch of folks who are going to shout back, "Hey, I love my country and it's my flag and things are not being done as they should, blah, blah, blah, and so I'm burning the flag in protest of the wrongs," or whatever. I say poppycock. Millions of ways to "protest" in America, and people listen to them all. Burning the flag is taking the symbol of everything that is America and destroying it in the name of a few grievances.
If Old Glory were not a sacred symbol to all Americans, then why have so many patriots in our past given up their lives to see that she is flying over given battle sites? The Iwo Jima statue, of course, is the incident most often referred to; however, there have been skirmishes in many, many remote war zones where men have died while rushing to "rescue" Old Glory.
I'm sorry, corny as it may sound, burn my flag and you burn my soul. And that I cannot tolerate. Find something else to symbolize your protests, but respect my flag or get the hell out of my country.
by burning books, you are erasing the knowledge, history of everybody
("Where they burn books, they will end up burning people, too.")
Books are what Hitler burned...that sux as well.......a crime against humanity..
Books though. Books aren't cheap these days, man. I'd be more upset about someone burning a book, especially if it was one of mine, or one from my school's library.