TRUE OR FALSE?: More wimpy men are attracted to the Democrat party than to the Republican party.

It is a haven for weak-willed, homosexuals, perverts, criminals and other assorted low-lifes.

Republicans are the party of self responsibility as all strong men and women are. The democrats are the party of angry crybabies that cry for elitists to take care of them like children or sugar babies because they are too lazy and too big of cowards to face any challenges or even take care of themselves. What the hell kind of real man or woman could support that?

Just going by what I've seen here on SH, it tends to be conservative men (some, not all) who feel the need to prove their masculinity to everyone by demeaning women, making fun of homosexuals, and bragging about how "tough" they are. Such behavior is, ironically, a sign of insecurity in one's masculinity. Liberal men may be more openly "wimpy," but I think there are a lot of closet cases in the Republican party. Basically, if you have to prove you're a man, you ain't. This is true regardless of political affiliation.

Unless it comes to actually working and taking care if yourselves right? Then it is whine, that is too hard and not fair, I need a sugar daddy to take care if me and elitist politicians to make all of my decisions.

You can work and take care of yourself without bragging about how much better you are than people of a different political ideology. Actions speak louder than words. I don't believe in government handouts, but I see all too many so-called conservatives enjoying them.

'cause it'a true!

No but I've known a lot of bullies who don't seem to understand the difference between being tough and being an a$$hole (and often equate NOT being an a$$hole-bully with being a wimp) I still have reminders of times I've chosen to face down those types of guys (I really hate bullies).

The whole tough-guy conservative is based on false pretenses and might be more of a rejection of self-analysis and compassion than actual toughness. Besides, LIKING the movie Rambo doesn't make you tough any more than liking Star Wars makes you a Jedi. I'm not saying all conservatives live in tough-guy fantasy land (and liberals don't) but I do think it's more common among conservatives than liberals.

And aside from my personal observations; I'd be willing to bet Bill Maher and Jon Stewart could take Marcus Bachmann and George WIll in a fight.

I don't see what political party has to do with strength.

Look at them and you have the answer.

'nuff said!

Birds of a feather flock together. 'nough said

They are neutered sissy men who are into LBGT

Are you slurring homosexuals implying that they are automatically wimps?

I think that this calls for stereotyping, which I don't believe in.

No, not really. It just calls for analysis BY PERCENTAGE. If I said over 95% of black voters voted Democrat for Obama, would I be wrong? So too, if I say a much higher percentage of wimps vote Democrat, that is based upon factual records, not stereotyping.

But "wimp" is a subjective term so it can't really be put into a percentage in the same way gender, or race can. I mean you have to define wimp to give it a percent. Also just because someone has percentages doesn't mean that person has won the argument as the percents could be false. I mean anyone can just whip up some percents to support an argument.

I totally agree with Greencone.

stereotyping of this sort, doesn't make sense

It's not stereotyping. It's based on percentages. See my reply above to geenaroses.

If you're unable to relate to men who aren't wimps, then you of course have no concept of what a true manly man is [not a macho type trying to hide true self].

Why would you say that I'm "unable to relate to men who aren't wimps"?

I didn't say that, or even imply that.

What's your point? Are you just trying to be insulting, or do you have some agenda?

so true!

No explanation needed...



or should they post a pic of Dan Quayle too?

No one with any credibility would dispute that. But no one's implying that they are no wimps in the GOP. The question asks if MORE of them are attracted to the Democrat party. And I'd suspect that for every one you find in the GOP you'll be able to find more than three who are Dems. It's about PERCENTAGES, not absolutes. So don't try dodging the issue with irrelevancies.

dodging the issue's huh?
Just like you do most times - we all know you dislike Democrats tncdel, how about getting over it, or has that thought crossed your mind? Don't pretend this wasn't for show and tell - Your "question" isn't even an "issue". It's a biased statement disguised as a hypothetical question.
It's typical of you to only see your side of the yard isn't it.

There are wimps in both the GOP and the Democrats - duh... does that answer your "question"? still too much of a dodge???
FALSE - THEY ARE ALL WIMPS! There - question answered fully.

Of course there are exceptions, like this guy. (Rino South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham who was in favor of Cap'n Trade because he thought it was a BDSM costume pirate good for a free personal lashing.)

But the ratio of wimps to real men is a lot higher in the GOP than the Dems. Plus even Graham seems almost manly when compared to the likes of a Dem specimen like this:

Oh yeah. That's definitely the case, not to mention a disproportionate number of manly women in the Congressional democrat ranks.

More educated men are attracted to the Democrat party. And you know what they say,

Whimpiness and Republicans go hand in hand.

Just look into their eyes and faces, it is written all over them.

These people are too dangerous for me to consider them "wimpy." I think any one of them, man or woman, would slit your throat in a heartbeat, to achieve their goal. Now if you said "cowardly confidence men," I'd wholeheartedly agree.

Point well taken. But wimps can be diabolical, yet wimps, nonetheless.

Stereotypes and assumptions are not fact, and are only used by small minded people.