Question Fun
Ted Kennedy's Senate Seat is not A Temporary Vacancy!!!! Please read, leave a comment, and share with your SodaHead's.
Old Timer "IN GOD WE TRUST" September 01, 2009 14:24:37
- 24 answers
- Read all 60 comments
- +11 raves
His seat is a permanent vacancy and should be filled by vote, not temporary appointment.
They changed the law several years ago to not allow a Republican to be temporarily appointed by the Governor. Now practically with his dying breath, Kennedy want's the law changed back so that the Governor can appoint a Dem into the seat. One more attempt at Dem HocusPocus to maintain 60 in the Senate. The law says the governor can't do it as it stands now. The people of Massachusetts need to get out and tell their state legislature that they want a VOTE in who the REPLACEMENT will be. They are already talking about another Kennedy.
They changed the law several years ago to not allow a Republican to be temporarily appointed by the Governor. Now practically with his dying breath, Kennedy want's the law changed back so that the Governor can appoint a Dem into the seat. One more attempt at Dem HocusPocus to maintain 60 in the Senate. The law says the governor can't do it as it stands now. The people of Massachusetts need to get out and tell their state legislature that they want a VOTE in who the REPLACEMENT will be. They are already talking about another Kennedy.
Loading... 

Top Answer
-
The fact is they have proven themselves shameless political whores by changing the law once to benefit themselves and will now be equally shameless in changing it back.View thread

AMERICA does NOT need 'rubber stamps' -- it does NOT need 'fingers of blame' ..
The voters should have the right to CHOOSE .. and that means that the people might have a chance of someone in office that may Actually READ the MESSES before they sign (or better yet -- DENY signing on the bottom line)!
Exactly what is wrong letting the voters of that state choosing whom ever they see fit to fill the seat in November?
Our turn for repeals is coming in 2010, and we will have it, one way or the other. Crimocrats take your pick. Look around you. I would like this settled without ACORN, because it has come to the attantion of the Republicans, Indendipents, and the Blue Dog Democrats (Those few that haven't joined the Crimocrat party). Just shows you how stupid Crimocrats are. Going against the Constitution is treason, this is a criminal act, and Crimocrats are to dumb to realize that.
There is an old statute in this country that shows a sad fact. I say sad, because most times it is a bad thing, but in defence of the Constitution, it is not. That statute is, "If the law does not do it's job, the vigilanties will." So here it is, set before you members of Congress; "Choose between life and death, take your pick." That does not necessarily mean you "life", it means a political death from which you will not be able to overcome. But if you use Acorn, Well, it could become vigilanty, in that case, all bets are off.
I am really starting to HATE the democratic party.
and Republicans are almost there for me too
Freaking liberals are idiots.
What the hell has this become...a MAKE UP THE LAWS AS YOU GO society???
Liberals are so transparent.
the days they had a vote scheduled. I sure his staff made all the decisions......
Teddy would have been like that if he had lived longer.
Thanks for the comment about the pictures...........I choose them with time and thoughtfulness.
I do not like the idea of a 60 vote Senate, as in my opinion it then becoms a 61 man Dictatorship.... something we do not want or need
That would give the Dems. 60 votes!