Students bullied and murdered the student just because of gay discrimination.
Los Angeles (CNN) -- A judge declared a mistrial Thursday
after jurors said they were hopelessly deadlocked in the murder trial of
a teenager accused of gunning down a gay classmate in their Southern
California classroom.
Ventura County Superior Court confirmed the
ruling in the eight-week trial of Brandon McInerney, who was 14 at the
time of the shooting in 2008.
The nine-woman, three-man jury
panel said its last vote resulted in seven in favor of finding the
defendant guilty of voluntary manslaughter, CNN affiliates reported.
McInerney was tried as an adult on charges of first-degree murder, use of a handgun and a hate crime.
McInerney,
now 17, allegedly shot 15-year-old Lawrence King, an eighth grader at
E.O. Green Junior High School in Oxnard, twice while both were typing
papers in a computer lab for their English class, authorities said.
King,
an openly gay teenager, was seated in the middle of the classroom with
two dozen students and their teacher when McInerney allegedly shot him
in the back of the head, authorities said.
Friends said King was
proud of being openly gay. He liked wearing jewelry and makeup to
school, and he often wore high-heeled boots with the school uniform. He
asked his teachers to call him Leticia instead of Larry. Some students
bullied him, pupils said.
The prosecution alleged McInerney had
planned to shoot King over unwanted sexual advances, and said that
McInerney had white-supremacist leanings, according to affiliate KABC.
The
defense contended McInerney had a violent upbringing. It also argued
that King taunted and flirted with McInerney, ultimately sparking the
fatal confrontation, KTLA reported.
The trial
was held in Chatsworth, in neighboring Los Angeles County, because the
defendant successfully sought a change of venue in the high-profile
case, said Ventura County Chief Deputy District Attorney Mike Frawley.
By the CNN Wire Staff
Read More: http://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/09/01/california.gay...
Top Opinion
-
Dub 2011/09/05 00:23:11Well, I agree that I don't like the homosexual, but don't have go so far+5There's no reason to shoot him. And a deadlocked jury. I would have voted to convict him of the murder. If the gay kid was making unwanted sexual advances or flirting with me if a simple stop it didn't work, or getting mad and telling him knock it off didn't work, then a punch to the face would suffice. If he still didn't learn his lesson after that then I'd press harassment charges, not shoot the kid.






















And btw, why on earth shouldn't he flaunt his sexuality? Why should he 'tone down'. Everyone should have the right to be who they are!!!
I haven't followed this case, but, so far it makes no sense.
One student shoots another IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD and the jury can't come to a decision? WTF?
" .... The defense contended McInerney had a violent upbringing ...." This is not a defense. This is more proof for the prosecution.
I'm disgusted by a defense move that takes part of the reason a criminal act was commited - gives it a psychological and/or socialogical name and tries to turn into an excuse toward 'not guilty'.
Headline: Gay kid gets murdered.
Other headline: Kid gets murdered.
It's still the same isn't it?
Horribly horribly wrong.
:c
I can't wait for universal acceptance.
we have to believe.. :c