Should the U.S. intervene in Libya?

by Fox Report with Shepard Smith Posted 2011/02/22 15:52:48

Read More

1,901 votes
Read all 57 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	535 votes	28%
	No	1,366 votes	72%

Add a comment above

Mike_Force 2011/03/04 23:46:14

No

Only the Prez knows these things.

reply
Cold Warrior 2011/02/25 21:41:54

No

No way. No matter what we did to help stop the slaughter of civilians it would be propagandized on al-jazeera TV.

But get ready for $5+ for a gallon gas.

reply
Rocky 2011/02/24 13:52:49

No

Not no....but HELL NO! We are having problems at home of our own. Union Bullies attacking women, a n un-susstainble and skyrocketing National Debt, our Soldiers off in two different places already, and from the way things are headed politically, we may have a World-War if tensions keep building. Our Country should never have taken on the role of being the World's Police Force....NEVER!

reply
Lo.Co 2011/02/24 13:51:39

No

Not our fight.

reply
Doug 2011/02/24 13:33:14

No

The "World Police" need to lay down their weapons.

reply
rayann 2011/02/24 11:45:14

No

Why get involved in yet another country's problems? It's not like we are a role model here with our leaders looking out for themselves and not the people. Maybe we should take a page from their book and "demand" our president (if that's what you want to call him) resign.

reply
ScooterballUSA 2011/02/24 11:06:19

No

The 4 Star Generals at the Pentagon should arrest the President and all of his cabinet for allowing this disaster to happen. Its not a military Coup! Its a failed democracy with congress and the President Robbing the nation of Tax Payer dollars by creating the deficit for campaign funds.

reply
JCD aka "biz" 2011/02/24 11:00:01

No

Undecided, really, Qaddafi has brought in mercenaries from Chad and Niger, and they are killing people. I don't know if the Egyptians might want to help, the Libyan province which is closest to their country is now apparently free.

reply
KevinDobbs 2011/02/24 08:10:31

Yes

+1
depends.

reply
mrdog 2011/02/24 07:55:24 (edited)

No

+1
USA shouldn't intervene anywhere in the world.... all troops should be on home turf... including those in Europe.... why are we in Europe? Can anyone answer that question?

Close down both conflicts.... get our troops home...just do it!!! bark

p.s. Libya will fall or stand on bloodshed... Gadhafi is absolutely nuts....hey let the UN send troops to Libya...UN did a marvelous job in Serbian conflict... remember?

reply
TrueAmerica 2011/02/24 07:17:53

No

Let them handle their own problems we need to handle ours. Stop sending money and support to these countries in the middle east cut off foreign aid to all of them!!!

reply
Ariel 2011/02/24 06:39:53

No

How about we not hastily jump into another war that we don't belong in just to get stuck doing all the work for the country and jeopardizing our men simultaneously.

reply
BrandonZavala 2011/02/24 06:33:30

No

no, our country (US) needs to let the world takes its course and stop butting in

reply
Balladeer-PWCM-POTL 2011/02/24 06:31:10

No

intervene with WHAT??? it's taking our resources for a mexican standoff in iraq Nam and Afnamistan

reply
nightlight 2011/02/24 06:22:29

No

We can't afford it and have no business getting ourselves involved in other countries' affairs.
Nor should we have "intervened" in Iraq or Afghanistan; we are not the police force of the world.

reply
David P 2011/02/24 06:08:44

No

Hell No Lets come home

reply
Jon Peter 2011/02/24 04:44:19

No

Political evolution is occurring before our eyes. Let the people make that change and overthrow the oppressive regime.

reply
Redneck 2011/02/24 04:31:54

No

The US should say "who ever wins, we want to goo relationship with them, but we want whats his name to treat his people right".

reply
Phyl *In God i Trust* 2011/02/24 04:16:41

No

the call death to us , no stay away.

reply
beavith1 2011/02/24 03:26:22

Yes

+2
but only to stop mass brutality.

remember Rwanda? Burundi? Sarajevo?

not our finest moments.

reply
DEMONN NINNJA 2011/02/24 03:18:53

No

+1
How about we worry more about ourselves and a little less about others. :P

reply
The Dude 2011/02/24 03:08:56

No

+2
Intervene?!? NO!!! Make contingencies for what's coming next!?! ABSOLUTELY!!!

reply
greggerz 2011/02/24 03:07:21

No

+1
NO. And we should'nt be anywhere in the Middle East either

reply
urlib 2011/02/24 02:57:56

No

We don't know how to go and come back. Besides, the world would think that we had ulterior motives.

reply
Assault 2011/02/24 02:42:57

No

Like the last time we intervened in other countries affairs? Maybe Clinton should be more quicker on calling them out but that is it. Not sitting around to play it safe then call them out. Stop reacting to the situation and lead the charge (with words)

reply
Morgan Orlins 2011/02/24 02:18:10

No

Intervene? No.

reply
KY REDNECK 2011/02/24 02:17:09

No

those people hate us too begin with. What do you think it would be like if we stepped in.

reply
banzaibuckaroo 2011/02/24 02:10:45

No

It's Libya's civil disturbance, and we can't look like we're part of the situation.

reply
wtf12345 2011/02/24 01:49:43

No

+1
The United States has her own issues at had to deal with like the FLEE-BAGGERS that run away when duty calls.

reply
SlightlySweet 2011/02/24 01:47:52

No

+1
The US has nothing to do with it. Stop trying to be the hero. Besides, we already have our own problems to deal with, not to mention we're still dealing with the middle east.

reply
ladygreensleeves 2011/02/24 01:39:10

No

+1
Libya is a craphole and a terrorist hotbed. Let them kill each other and let God sort em out for all I care. We would never get anything accomplished there.

reply
Stan 2011/02/24 01:38:34

No

+1
This is Libya's affair and should only be dealt with by the people of Libya. Even if it means a lot of blood must be shed to achieve success and only the people of Libya can form a new government that would satisfy them.

The US was born this way and so were many other countries!

reply
dman278 2011/02/24 01:31:38

No

+1
If Gaddafi keeps murdering his citizens in such large numbers, someone will have to step in. But I would definitely not support a continued foreign military presence there.

reply
Stan to dman278 2011/02/24 01:35:15
dman278 to Stan 2011/02/24 12:32:31

+1
I'm not convinced that will be the case, but you may be right. But even if it is, our track record of occupying sovereign nations just doesn't sit well with me.

reply
Doug to Stan 2011/02/24 13:35:35

Ya think??? Perhaps they can get one like we have in Barack Hussein Obama mama.

reply
prosperhappily 2011/02/24 01:11:28

No

+1
Tired of being the world policeman. And, I'm tired of spending billions of dollars to help people and have them hate us for it. And, it's just none of our damn business. We should only jump in when their problems become our problems.

reply
The Gov-Here to help BN362 2011/02/24 01:05:46

Yes

+1
How the hell did 916 people vote on this, but only ten commented??? I guess perhaps people don't know why they answered that way.

We should intervene and hang this guy.

reply
(▪‿▪)DoctorWhoGuru(▪‿▪) 2011/02/24 00:30:19

No

No

reply
Swany 2011/02/24 00:07:45

No

+1
The army can't even beet a hand full of mountain hillbillies in Afghanistan.

reply