Should condoms be dispensed at schools?

Where did I ever say I believe in all that rampant socialism crap?

The rights protected for individuals, in the Constitution, are true rights, as they are not rights that other people are required to provide for people. The only exception is, the right to a jury trial. True rights, are the rights to be left alone from intrusive government. You do NOT have a right to a job. You have the right to seek a job. The employer does NOT have to hire you. If the employer has to pay too much taxes, well there goes the money he could have chosen to spend, to hire you.

Parents have the God-given right to enjoy having "all the children God gives." They do NOT have the right, to make me or you, pay for it.

I believe in individual liberty, and personal responsibility.

I do NOT believe in the government monopoly in education. Government schools should be sold off. Abolish the income and property taxes, and let parents pay tuition to the school of their own children, or they can home-school or internet-school, if they lack the money or don't want to spend it.

Free lunches? Why does anybody expect a "free lunch?" The Bible says, if a man will not work, neither should he eat. (Of course you can get a free lunch sometimes. I've went to a few of those. But they say, if you buy whatever it is that they are selling with that free lunch, it will likely be the most expensive lunch you have had.) Okay, I do have a heart. "Here's a shovel and some seeds, and a little homesteading plot of land somewhere. So have at it." I think that approach, might shorten the lines at the "unemployment compensation" office, that subsidizes and prolongs unemployment. And there probably would be some takers still.

So you are insulting most all of our ancestors, who commonly had large families, so that we could come to be born?

I want more young people to marry and get pregnant, if they want to, if they are ready. You don't want for people to have more good options? You are anti-choice?

Most marriages didn't used to end in divorce. That largely started, with the advent of "the pill" in 1960. Do some research. Marriages end so much in divorce, in The United Slaves of America, because the people are now stupid and wicked and selfish. Selfishness is the same reason for contraception as for abortion, therefore, contraceptive use relates to promoting abortions.

Why is it so hard to find decent jobs anymore? It's because of the rampant socialism.

Why do people rebel so much against God? God says get married, have sex, have babies, grow families. Rather elegant and natural. Man says, we want to rebel, we'll have sex without the benefits of stable marriage, we will burn with lust towards even the same sex, and we refuse the blessings of children. And then we have the gall to wonder why our marriages fall apart, and even our country is now falling apart. Well where's the investment into families, the basic building blocks of our nation?

Am I quiverfull? So you know of that website? What do you mean? As in philosophy, or being a member of their "cult?" Yes, I believe in encouraging families everywhere to have "full quivers," for that's clearly what it is talking of, in Psalm 127. Even starting families young. I believe in the natural spread of human life, without the complicated and selfish use of some means of anti-life and often quite unnatural, "birth control."

And where is it written, that all education stops, just as soon as a person gets married? Parents don't have books and computers?

So then, why are the pagans trying to force their false religion upon us, and make us pay for all the problems it causes?

And way should I address your ridiculous claims of the "evil" that the Bible supposedly promotes? You sound like you just want to argue, and are fishing for some excuse to not believe. Perhaps you have a more honest, or specific question? If you are going to raise every irrelevant red herring question, what do you want of me? An entire sermon? Can't you go find those online somewhere, or in a good Church?

I supposed not everybody has to be a Christian exactly, because much of "the Church" is apostate these days anyway. Christian is a bad word in some parts, for it means to many, Catholic or Sunday-keeper. The Bible says the 7th Day is the Sabbath. And that's what the early Church kept, before Constantine came in and corrupted things, mixing paganism with Christianity. Sun-day is about worshiping the sun god, and the Catholic cathedrals are full of idols. You could join Seventh Day Baptists or Adventists, but then, they don't respect the Jewish customs nor the Jewishness of Yeshua (Jesus) nor the disciples, nor of the Bible. So I would suggest, find a good Messianic fellowship, for they are bridge between the Jews and the Christians.

How do you claim to be "pro-choice," when that usually seems to mean, anti-life? Dos the baby choose to die?

Who's making anybody to marry young? How are you supposed to marry young, if you don't know yet who to marry? I was only saying, it's okay for more people to marry younger. That's giving people MORE CHOICES. So who's "pro-choice" now?

It sounds like you don't know what you are talking about.

Did I just not talk about the distinctions between Catholic\Sunday-keepers, and Messianics who keep the Sabbath?

Do you expect me to argue with you, that the Catholic Church is not corrupt, or some counterfeit or perversion? When I already say that the Catholic Church is corrupt? But please do not paint with too much a broad stereotypical brush, and blame all of "Christianity" for abuses Catholic. Early Church leaders, said that the Pope was the Anti-Christ. Forced conversions is NOT the Christian way, but the Muslim way. So does that then imply, that Catholics aren't Christian? Well the Catholic Church at least, isn't Christian. But even "Christian" might be a bad word in some circles, for it implies Catholic or Sunday-keeper. So I no longer call myself a Protestant Christian, but a Messianic ("Messianic Judaism"), as I probably should be more clear how I belief, and Christian is now too vague a word, that could mean almost anything? Messianic means both Christian and Jewish, meaning that some Messianics are Jews, some are Gentiles, but we all believe in things Jewish, and accept Yeshua (Jesus) as the promised Messiah. So we are the bridge between the Christians and the Jews, for we have the best of both worlds. And we keep the Sabbath.

Surely you have heard stories about celibate Catholic priests who abuse boys? But celibacy isn't even biblical. It was invented to keep more money into the Catholic Church, because when priests had heirs, that took much of the money away. It's about power, not morality, nor righteousness. No wonder there was a Protestant reformation, but it didn't go far enough. Protestants are still too much like the Catholics. This is a complicated subject, that I suggest you go read and research about.

Did you know that many countries in Africa, were keeping Sabbath, until the Sunday-keeping missionaries came?

Listen to the Seventh Day Adventists, for they might have missed the respecting things Jewish stuff, but they make a good case for defending the Sabbath. According to them, when we bring back mandatory Sunday laws, it will be pretty much the end of the world. A time of great perversion and persecution.

You make it sound like being a "single parent Mom" is the end of the world.

I think part of defending proper sexual morality, is in allowing for and welcoming even "unintended" and "outside of wedlock" pregnancies, babies into the world. And trying to do the right thing, even after the fact. If neither of the 2 are married, then they probably should get married.

Had Sarah Palin promoted some other less moral Sex Ed, perhaps her daughter may have still got "knocked up" and it happen anyway?

Maybe the problem was, that Sarah was too busy running for political offices, or being governor, to spend enough time being a good mother?

But I would rather not moralize so much against people bringing babies into the world, even if into "less than ideal" situations. For I think human life is amazing and would like to see human life spread more freely and abundantly. Preferably within marriage, but I also know how things are, and that human reproductive drive, is very powerful, a reason why world population continues to burgeon, supposedly seemingly, almost "out of control."

I have often circulated baby congratulation cards, and I wondered if I should for a guy and lady at work, who were expecting a baby, but not married. I think I asked a friend or fellow Christian (before I was Messianic), what they thought of the matter. If I do a baby card, am I condoning them failing to have gotten married? Well I think whoever I asked, said I probably should do the baby card anyway, and I did.

I think it's wrong to bash Christians, saying that we condemn anybody who isn't completely abstinent until marriage. We live now in an immoral, and "crowded" and erotic world. It's amazing how many billions we have now become. The baby already happened, and we have to move on, and now try to do the right things. Want to go on having sex? Why not do it right, get married, don't use any "birth control," and welcome human life to spread freely?