You are quite off in your assessment. Being a liberal does not necessarily mean you are sucking on the teat of the government, just like being a conservative does not mean you are not on welfare, on Medicaid and/or food stamps.
I strongly believe that many SodaHead "conservatives" are actually "on the receiving end" of the Koch brothers' "largesse".
So many similar "answers" at the same time, sounds fishy.
At least, as long as the liberal media propaganda machine is in place to pat them on the back and tell them how wonderful and smart they are... Liberals are way too thin-skinned and sensitive and would not thrive if they had to withstand the stings and barbs that the rest of us receive from them.
Paid? Directly or indirectly... they are seeing themselves on the sunny side of the street...
Yeah, I remember all those liberals that were too big to fail and got millions from the government. Oh! I'm sorry those were the conservative corporate banks that got the money...
What we need in government are a bunch of politicians who look after OUR money like they do their own. Joe Biden hasn't given a dime to charity in years, yet he consistently endorse giving YOUR money to the "poor". I would venture to say, he also supports and employs EVERY tax loophole possible on his own tax returns!
For those who want Republican candidates to furnish ALL tax returns, they should also be demanding the same from their liberal darlings. But then, they don't understand the concept of "all men, created equal"...
How stupid can you get? Liberals and Libertarians work just as hard as Conservatives. Well, it's no surprise that this attitude is so prevalent amongst so called Conservatives here on SH. It's exactly what they are spoon-fed by Fox News and the Right Wing talking heads on TV and radio everyday. They know everything, and anybody who disagrees with them and their myopic view of the world is evil. All you can do is laugh at their ignorance. Fortunately, I know lots of REAL Conservatives who have a much more realistic view of the world.
Even on SH too many people are voting for a living including the so called third party cheerleaders of whom Obama is relying heavily on, just more tit for tat.........
You of so little mind MUST be a CONJOBSERVATIVE I'll bet ,talk obout a biased loaded question did your momma teach you that or did your little inadequate peabrain come up with it all by itself MORON ????
Weather it is stupid, funny, or important, neither of the two children needed to reply in such a way that actually makes the question seem, well,factual. How come some people, (and this includes Conservatives and Liberal minded folk) reply out of offence? Don't answer the post if you don't like it. There are at least 1000 on my happening page I haven't even seen yet. Are they that thin skinned that their fingers are forced to answer? Your question is yours, I thought it was funny.
If all the sheep woke up things might change. Alas, I believe it is most likely to late. People in this country only believe what the media is paid for them to hear. That,s why we as a population are forced to put up with this Disgraceful form of Government the sheep keep voting into our lives. Paid Slavery vs Being Rich. This is your Government, A bunch of rich men and women who already have more money than you will every see in your lifetime. And their Salaries of $170,000 for a year. A lucky Average American will make $25,000 a year, and it will take (him or her) 6.8 Years to earn $170,000. Why is it people can't seem to wake up and see that somethings wrong when those who make $170,000 a year can't show they have labored in our behalf. But it is easy to see the 6.8 years of labor and stress in the face of the Average American Worker.
The short answer is I don't have enough information about anyone here to answer that honestly. The longer answer is I think charitable donations statistics show us the most interesting point of view. The people who believe in smaller government, fewer entitlement programs and more personal responsibility are statistically higher donors to charity. Period! That doesn't mean that all the people on SODAHEAD who are left-leaning are on the public dole. I don't know anything about most of the people here who strike me as more liberal than conservative. They might be tax paying, hard working folks. I just know that when you accept that smaller government gives us more prosperity, but fewer entitlements, you accept that part of helping those around you who might NEED the type of help the entitlements offer, means giving locally to ease the transition and reduce dependance overall. I guess, as a rule, I wouldn't look to severely left-leaning folks to find those who give more than they take, though.
It is always easy to be super generous with money you did not earn. Liberals fail to understand that MAYBE the rest of us, who do work, are SICK of them spending ours to enrich the lazy and the very wealthy as obama has done.
Don't think so, it's just that the government there didn't make agreements with the pharmaceutical industry to keep the prices high. The government of Canada is not furnishing her drugs; at least it doesn't for any of the people I know who have ordered drugs from there.
In the US the prescription here would cost over $500 a month and these drugs must be taken for life, so she gets the prescription filled out in Canada at a cost of $125 a month!
At the same time she is adamant that she will never support "socialized medicine" as no self respecting Republican would!
Is she a closet socialist or simply a smart capitalist?
I'm aware of the differences in price for drugs in the U.S. and what these pharma companies sell them for in other countries. They make agreements with the countries to sell for a certain price; then make up the difference by raping the American patient who has to take these meds. Just as they negotiate a price for the drugs dispensed through the VA system. They are pretty much given free rein in the U.S. to make up the difference in profit that they are not making elsewhere.
Purchasing drugs from Canada in no way supports socialized medicine. It is definitely the sign of a smart capitalist.
By the way, my sister-in-law was prescribed an incredibly expensive pain medication while suffering from brain stem cancer. The pills were over $3000 a week at their "discount" pharmacy. Her husband found them in Canada for less than $100 for the same amount.
Now, following this to the logical conclusion, the pharma would NOT be cutting their prices to sell in other countries if they were not STILL making some profit at the lowered price. They are at least "keeping the lights on" at these rates. The U.S. population provides their profit.
So many similar "answers" at the same time, sounds fishy.
Paid? Directly or indirectly... they are seeing themselves on the sunny side of the street...
Neither one is a liberal nor a conservative.
Or so you think...
I have a Republican neighbor who has her prescriptions sent to Canada, does that count as government largesse even if it is a foreign government?
In the US the prescription here would cost over $500 a month and these drugs must be taken for life, so she gets the prescription filled out in Canada at a cost of $125 a month!
At the same time she is adamant that she will never support "socialized medicine" as no self respecting Republican would!
Is she a closet socialist or simply a smart capitalist?
Purchasing drugs from Canada in no way supports socialized medicine. It is definitely the sign of a smart capitalist.
By the way, my sister-in-law was prescribed an incredibly expensive pain medication while suffering from brain stem cancer. The pills were over $3000 a week at their "discount" pharmacy. Her husband found them in Canada for less than $100 for the same amount.
Now, following this to the logical conclusion, the pharma would NOT be cutting their prices to sell in other countries if they were not STILL making some profit at the lowered price. They are at least "keeping the lights on" at these rates. The U.S. population provides their profit.