Quantcast

'OMG' Dates Back to Almost 100 Years Ago: Real or Hoax?

AdriHead 2012/08/08 23:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
OMG... you guys won't believe this! So, you know the abbreviation "OMG," short for the phrase "Oh My God"? Well, it was evidently used as early as 1917, in some correspondence from John Arbuthnot Fisher to Winston Churchill. Do you believe it? Or do you think this news is a little too good to be true?

THEMARYSUE.COM reports:
Younger generations these days are saddled with a lot of responsibilities they're not quite prepared for: Coming of age in a time of economic turmoil, figuring out how to get Earth to let us keep living on it without drowning in its rising oceans, dealing with the ever-looming threat that Siri will finally follow through with her plan and enslave us all.

Less grave, but nonetheless usually put on the youths of the world, is the popularization of text-speak. You know the type: LOL, LMFAO, ROFL, OMG, Totes. Well, it turns out there's at least one of those abominations to the English language that no one in any recent generation has to take the blame for: OMG is at almost a hundred years old.

omg totes turns abominations english language generation blame omg years

Read More: http://www.themarysue.com/omg-is-old/

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Steveth... JMCC 2012/08/09 10:08:16
    Stevethinks
    Ye you guys came over here and wanted to line up. Didn't work. I never liked Churchill.
  • JMCC Steveth... 2012/08/09 10:22:34
    JMCC
    +2
    True - but we learned our lesson on that one for the second time around..

    :P
  • bill.fi... JMCC 2012/08/09 14:19:05
    bill.fife.3
    Coventry got over him. Always wondered why.
    Talk about a chess game using live pieces. :P
  • JMCC bill.fi... 2012/08/09 14:30:08 (edited)
    JMCC
    +2
    I was referring to the time that the US declared war on GB during our war with Napoleon....

    Coventry (and Plymouth) were firebombed in retaliation for Dresden, and Churchill knew it was coming because we had intercepted the communiques. He was in a real dilemma; evacuate the cities and let the Germans know that we had cracked the Enigma code (our biggest advantage) or let them be bombed....

    This is no a matter of public record as the papers were declassified some time after his death.

    plymouth bombing
  • bill.fi... JMCC 2012/08/09 14:48:38 (edited)
    bill.fife.3
    You refer to the War of 1812. Yes territorial disputes are great for generating conflict. The real losers were the native tribes.
    http://www.factmonster.com/ip...

    But maintaining an empire sometimes requires fighting on multiple fronts.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
  • JMCC bill.fi... 2012/08/09 14:50:57
    JMCC
    I thought the US declared war on us because we sank a warship that the US were intending to deliver to the French Navy....
  • bill.fi... JMCC 2012/08/09 14:58:50 (edited)
    bill.fife.3
    +1
    I will be the first to say I have always been confused about that war. History is taught by the winners but I am not sure just who won that one. Those facts don't exactly match what we were taught in school. Trade between the U.S. and England also played a part in the U.S. Civil War but here it was all about slavery if you ask. Always the winners that get to decide on facts.
    This is more inline with what was taught on this side of The Pond re: War of 1812- http://www.factmonster.com/ip...
  • JMCC bill.fi... 2012/08/09 16:58:42
    JMCC
    Strangely enough they don't teach it at all. The little knowledge I have I researched after visiting the memorial in New Orleans.

    What I learned was that the US had signed an agreement not to sell weapons to the French and when the UK sank or took this warship on it's way to France it was argued that it was not a weapon as it was not being supplied with any cannon.

    Diplomacy failed and (thinking that GB had enough on their hands with their war in Europe) the US declared war.

    GB reacted more swiftly than the US had thought and were able to deploy 5 armies - 3 to Canada, one to New Orleans and one to attack Washington.

    The forces in Canada defeated the US forces there, and Washington was captured - whereupon the US sued for peace. The news took too long to reach the army tasked to take New Orleans (and therefore control the Mississippi).

    This engagement was a b*lls up from the very beginning for us Brits as the US forces were reinforced by a militia of people (smugglers and pirates) who knew the swamps like the back of their hands, and the majority of the British Forces died as they tried to cross. Either by drowning in mud or by guerrilla action.
  • A Lionh... JMCC 2012/08/10 00:01:59
    A Lionheart
    +1
    Cajuns, gotta love 'em. But that's what happens when you engage an enemy in a difficult terrain without the support of the indigenous folk.
  • JMCC A Lionh... 2012/08/10 00:25:17
    JMCC
    +1
    Yup - "you get your arse handed to you on a platter" ;)
  • COMALite J JMCC 2012/08/13 16:36:25
    COMALite J
    +1
    There was a great bit on the TV series Babylon 5 about Coventry.
  • Steveth... JMCC 2012/08/09 16:05:26
    Stevethinks
    +1
    War is hell.
  • Marianne™ 2012/08/08 23:01:31
  • Nam Era... Marianne™ 2012/08/09 02:50:53
    Nam Era Vet #1 DNA TLC
    +2
    Benny Hill. I loved The Benny Hill Show!!!
  • MkB Marianne™ 2012/08/09 05:19:39
    MkB
    +1
    tsk-tsk-tsk...
    soap bar

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Fun

2013/05/24 20:07:18

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals