Quantcast

Navy Struggles to Fill At-Sea Billets as Obama dismantles military

Ken 2012/08/05 01:33:16
Navy Struggles to Fill At-Sea Billets

Jul 30, 2012




Stars and Stripes

|

by Matthew M. Burke









Sailors

SASEBO NAVAL BASE, Japan -- The Navy will ship hundreds of
sailors to sea before their projected rotation date to fill undermanned
billets, the Navy has announced.


Over the past six months, the service has instituted measures to
address gaps in critical positions, offering cash and other perks to
compel sailors to head back out to sea. While those measures are still
taking hold, Navy officials said last week that more must be done to
address the at-sea manning issue -- including involuntary measures -- as
nearly one-third of its total enlisted ratings are currently unfilled.


As a result, existing programs are being expanded and new measures
implemented to ensure these billets are staffed properly, according to a
Navy news release.


“As our Navy is in ever-increasing demand around the world, filling
these gap billets at sea has become more critical,” Chief of Naval
Personnel Vice Adm. Scott Van Buskirk said in the release. “These
actions should reduce the short-notice actions to man high-priority
billets, such as cross-decking and diverts.”


The Navy is separating nearly 3,000 midcareer sailors this year in 31 other fields that are overmanned.





The new initiatives include targeting between 200 and 400 sailors
with critical skills over the next few months under Limited Directed
Detailing and sending them back to sea before their projected rotation
date, the release said. This initiative will target sailors who have
completed a minimum of 24 months on shore duty.


Also, the Chief Petty Officer Early Return to Sea program is being
updated and will now curtail shore duty for enlisted sailors between E-7
to E-9 and send them back to sea to fill billets that aren’t being
filled by rotating sailors.


There will also be changes to Career Management System Interactive
Detailing beginning in the August 2012 cycle, the news release said. A
single set of the highest priority sea and shore billets will be
identified, advertised and filled with priority by detailers each cycle.


In addition, the Voluntary Sea Duty Program is being extended for an
additional year and expanded to include high-tenure waivers so sailors
are not compelled to retire if they choose the sea, according to
officials from Personnel Support Activity Detachment Sasebo and the news
release.




Stars and Stripes.


Comment: Here we go again as a Democratic president once more dismantles our military!





You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • ☆stillthe12c☆ 2012/08/05 19:15:11
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +1
    Obama has been forcing drawdowns in all branches of our armed forces. Some of this thinking was started in the Bush administration and is a big mistake. As far as I know Bush did not go along with this thinking. When Obama talks about the government is getting smaller under him, he is talking about our armed force I think.
  • Ken ☆stillt... 2012/08/05 20:18:59
    Ken
    +1
    JImmy Carter did it and Reagan had to rearm the U.S., which Dems still bitch about even though it forced the collapse of the USSR and its "allies". Clinton did it again - much of his vaunted balancing of the budget was done on the backs of the military and the "peace dividend" that the collapse of the USSR brought. Every time this nation has been disarmed (always by Democrats!), it has invited aggression.
  • ☆stillt... Ken 2012/08/05 20:31:49
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +1
    I was working on the B-1 when Carter canceled it. The program was more that 90% complete when he did it. Poseidon was already finished had much of it done and he canceled the end of it as well. It was a good thing that most of it was in place. Most of the subs had been completed and the missile system was in place. I worked on both programs as well as many others. When B-1 B came back we had to redevelop everything. I was the project manager for just the insulator connector part of it.
  • Ken ☆stillt... 2012/08/06 00:36:37
    Ken
    +1
    Thank God Reagan revived the B-1 program, it's one of our top strategic weapons today.
  • ☆stillt... Ken 2012/08/06 01:09:11
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +1
    It is not as stealthy as the new ones but by far more reliable even though it is 30 years old. I have no idea as to how many computers the new ones had but the B-1B had 25. I did get to see how they were making the skins for the news ones. I was not told enough that I could help anyone, so no danger there. I was aware that they were being built. You know how that goes. They only tell you what you need to know. Lots of people knew that they were being built with a single wing construction. They flew over my house on night very low after dark, but they were low enough that I could see them. This was before they were exposed to the public. They were flying below radar and not lights. I am not sure of where they were going, but were heading in the direction of either pendelton or miramar. It is not much of a turn to go to El Centro. I work on that base when I was 19 building all those officers quarters.
  • Ken ☆stillt... 2012/08/06 05:11:37
    Ken
    +1
    My understanding is that the B-1's stealth was by electronics, that a radar pulse hitting it would trigger a return 180 degrees out of phase with return from the incoming pulse, canceling it out. We learned of the technology in its infancy in advanced avionics courses in the Navy in the 1960s - a "traveling wave tube" would do the job, but I'm certain it's much more sophisticated today.
    Speaking of the BOne, there's a novelist who has written a whole series of great military/action novels about a special B-one squadron, Dale Brown.

    bone novelist written series militaryaction novels b-one squadron dale brown
  • ☆stillt... Ken 2012/08/06 06:21:46
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    Yes, that was part of the reason for some of the computer that were on board. It would appear on the screen as a bird. It would appear a much smaller object. Now they may have advance it since then. In the mid 80's our fighter could see and airplane on their screen that was even on the other side of a mountain. That is how our fighter had a lot on the enemy. I never got a complete explanation of how it worked. I know that later it was being used on helicopters as well. This was used in desert storm to take out tanks on the the field. Now this one I think used feed from satellites. So the helicopter could use a hill for cover then popup and take out the adversary. This meant that they did not have to wait for a jet to come in and take them out. I book marked this.
  • Ken ☆stillt... 2012/08/06 17:32:20
    Ken
    The problem was that they could "wipe out" only about 99% of the energy in the reflected pulse by transmitting the out-of-phase pulse with it, but it took the leading edge of the pulse to trigger the transmission of the out-of-phase pulse, so the leading edge would return, showing a much smaller object than a B-1 bomber.

    Yes, even in the 1970s when I was still in, we had FLIR (Forward Looking Infra Red) systems and they also had doppler-internial guidance systems that allowed aircraft to follow the terrain. Aboard Enterprise we also had the same "smart bombs" as they have today but not as many, and they weren't used nearly as often.
  • ☆stillt... Ken 2012/08/06 17:46:30
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +1
    I did not know they had it that early. I know that Hughes developed it and that it mount in the nose cone of what ever they mounted it in. My boss had one of the receivers in his office. He was an Engineer working for Hughes. He immigrated here from England. Really sharp guy.
  • Ken ☆stillt... 2012/08/07 00:33:44 (edited)
    Ken
    +1
    The S-3 Viking, a fixed-wing, carrier based anti-submarine aircraft came out in the late 1970s just before my retirement. I was asst' OinC of Naval Aviation Maintenance Training Detachments at NAS North Island. We had just over 200 senior enlisted instructors, E-6 to E-9, who trained mechanics and electronics techs on the S-3, the H-3, on ordnance handling, aviation maintenance record keeping, and aviation ground support equipment. The S-3 at the time had the very latest in electronics, including FLIR, a very sophisticated radar and magnetic anomaly detection (MAD) gear. They no longer use them in ASW but in what are called "Sea Command" squadrons, I believe.

    s 3 viking
  • ☆stillt... Ken 2012/08/07 01:45:32
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +1
    Nice looking aircraft. Some time after that we allowed the Japanese to build our run silent screws and the Blanks sold them to Russia. Do you remember that.
  • Ken ☆stillt... 2012/08/07 03:21:34 (edited)
    Ken
    +1
    I mistakenly said "sea command," I think they are called "Sea Control" squadrons. I checked it out, they are called "Sea Control Squadrons" now, still flying the S-3 but it's the "B" version. We were training on the "A" - I'm not as out-of-date as I thought!
    squadrons checked sea squadrons stil flying s-3 version training out-of-style
  • ☆stillt... Ken 2012/08/07 03:44:01
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +1
    Every time I go to click on the shortcut the facebook banner cover it.
  • Ken ☆stillt... 2012/08/07 20:20:34
    Ken
    +1
    That is a pain in the butt, isn't it. SH must be making big money off our arguments, with all of the Pop-ups they have any more. If I get my cursor off into the right-hand margin I'll get an add covering whatever post I'm trying to read. Did you see that Fox News' Shepard Smith is blogging on SH as a "VIP?" I've read just one of his blogs - he's a fairly liberal guy for Fox.
  • ☆stillt... Ken 2012/08/07 20:24:06
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +1
    I have not read it, but I know that he is a liberal long ago by his comments in the past.
  • Ken ☆stillt... 2012/08/07 20:31:44
    Ken
    +1
    I believe it was Mitsubishi Heavy Industries that sold the technology -- computer-controlled machinery (CNC) and the software to run it, to the Soviets, which allowed them to machine very silent, anti-cavitation J-bladed props for their subs.

    Even in the 1960s we had a signal analyzer and an airborne system called "Jezebel" that could take the sound picked up by a sonobuoy hydrophone, spread it out on a graph across the audio spectrum, and allow us to tell what type of sub was in the area and how many RPM's it was turning. For thier nukes, we could pick up a turbine line at the high end of the spectrum. The U.S. had a network of hydrophones on the ocean floor, in both the Atlantic and Pacific, that could pick up their subs and analyze them the same way. The last I read they either scrapped the system or turned it over to universities to study marine life.



    J bladed submarine prop
  • ☆stillt... Ken 2012/08/07 20:39:19
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +1
    That is very interesting. Thank You Ken!!
  • Ken ☆stillt... 2012/08/07 23:28:38
    Ken
    +1
    If you've noticed, they are using the same technology on turboprops on the C-130 and other aircraft. Their props used to look like paddles but they changed on recent upgrades.

    C 130 propellers

    piaggio avantair

    Speaking of turboprops, have you ever seen the Piaggio Avanti, the greatest small private jet going? It's a pusher, with the engines and props well beyond the cabin, so it's the quietest private jet in the air. It cruises at close to 500 knots and has a range of 1800 miles, carrying two crew and seven passengers. It is cleared by the FAA to fly with pilot only - it's used as the corporate aircraft of Ferrari!




    ferrari piaggio avanti ferrari piaggio avanti
  • ☆stillt... Ken 2012/08/08 02:56:34
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    I have never heard of it. It is a great looking aircraft. With the wing pushed back so far it would be nice to look out the window. I like window seats as long as it on a craft that the fuselage does not take away from my foot space.
  • Ken ☆stillt... 2012/08/08 03:20:30 (edited)
    Ken
    +1
    Great interiors in that aircraft too - it beats all of the other pure jets in its size class, and gets 40% better mileage!

    Piaggio Avanti interior
  • ☆stillt... Ken 2012/08/08 03:26:40
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +1
    Now that looks great! I have a few friends that would have a problem walking down that isle.
  • Prairie Wind 2012/08/05 04:09:35
    Prairie Wind
    +1
    Perhaps delibertly?
  • Red Branch 2012/08/05 01:43:47
    Red Branch
    +2
    Obama is not missing a chance to destroy the US.
  • lonewolf 2012/08/05 01:36:35
    lonewolf
    +3
    the jackass is no friend to our military. he has shown that more then once
  • Ken lonewolf 2012/08/05 01:38:27
    Ken
    +3
    Any "American" who can't pronounce "Corpsman" doesn't know jack-sh!t about our military or its history!
  • lonewolf Ken 2012/08/05 01:39:36

Fun

2013/05/25 18:59:30

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals