MOVIE STARS. . . . . . . . DO THEY MAKE EM LIKE THEY USED TO? WHICH DO YOU PREFER?
Drue-AFCL
2012/07/07 17:46:26
|
|
|||||
|
14 votes
|
|
82% | |||
|
3 votes
|
|
18% | |||
Top Opinion
-
Christine/Rest in peace Pet... 2012/07/07 17:56:56YESTERYEAR+4Todays stars are so full of themselves, and the best way they see to promote themselves is by being as bad as they can be. The stars before my time had class. The studios would not keep them on contract if they had a bad public image. The actors used to entertain (USO) and support the troops, sometimes even leaving stardom to serve their country during war. For example Jimmy Stewart and Elvis both went to war. Now, many go protest for the other side, and most will not even entertain the troops let alone entertain the thought of wearing the uniform and getting shot at.






















All we have now are the same old tired talentless hacks hollywood shoves down our throats.
I don't ever want to see another move with Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Tom Cruise, Julia Roberts, Cameron Diaz, just to name a few.
There has got to be more talented young actors out there....I just know there are!
elements. However, the stars of yesteryear's screens do tend to portray a common decency and depth that reflected the values and principles that many ordinary people in those days believed in-but being fallible human beings did not always live up to-,but nevertheless TRIED TO, where as in these shallow times most people seem to believe in very little.
The 'old' film stars often portrayed those 'values' on the screen and hence the difference between them and those 'stars' of today...
What I missed most was that the older actors and actress didn't knock the country. That is with the exception of Barbra Streisand and Hanoi Jane Fonda.