Quantcast

Is SNOPES a true fact source?

Related Topics: Party, Election, Wikipedia, Barack Obama, Friends, Mom, Lawyers, Liberal, State, Office, Place, Obama, Liberals, Wife, Husband, blog, Video, Internet

Subject: EYE OPENER - SNOPES


For the past few years www.snopes.com has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the 'tell-all final word' on a ny comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes..com.


Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It's just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby. David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago - and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity with many believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation?


The reason for the questions - or skepticisms - is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues.


A few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a=2 0big splash across the internet, 'supposedly' the Mikkelson's clai m to have researched this issue before posting their findings on snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort 'ever' took place. I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this and I gave him Bud Gregg's contact phone numbers – and Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg no one from snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet, snopes.com issued a statement as the 'final factual word' on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things - not!



Then it has been learned the Mikkelson's are very Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose driven agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative.
There has been much criticism lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson's liberalism revealing itself in their website findings.

So, I say this now to everyone who goes to snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line facts...'proceed with caution.' Take what it says at face value and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Remember, you can always Google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that's all the Mikkelson's do. After all, I can personally vouch from my own experience for their 'not' fully looking into things.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes.com


I have found this to be true also! Many videos of Obama I tried to verify on Snopes and they said they were False...... ;Then they gave their Liberal slant....!!! I have suspected some problems with snopes for some time now, but I have only caught them in half-truths. If there is any subjectivity they do an immediate full left rudder. www.truthorfiction.com is a far a better source for verification, in my opinion.


This couple are is in the tank for Obama. There are many things t hey have listed on their site as a hoax and yet you can go to Youtube yourself and find the video of Obama actually saying these things. So you see, you cannot and should not... trust Snopes.com ever for anything that is remotely political! I don't even trust them to tell me if email chains are hoaxes anymore. So goes modern journalism. There are cropping up numerous sites and blogs that openly challenging Snopes's findings, opinions, and outright claims.< br>

A few conservative speakers on Myspace told me about Snopes a few months ago and I took it upon myself to do a little research to find out if it was true. Well, I found out for myself that it is true. Anyway So you might consider thinking twice before relying on for Snopes.com for fact checking and so your friends the courtesy of tipping them off to Snopes political slant.
Many people still think Snopes.com is neutral and they can be trusted as factual.
We need to make sure everyone is aware that... Snopes is a hoax in itself.

Betty Jones
baadjones@cebridge.net

Read more: http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/snopes-soros...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • LG 2010/12/07 18:18:41
    LG
    +10
    How can Wikipedia "get to the bottom of it" when any article on that site can be edited or added to by anyone? The articles are Wikipedia are not moderated, and anyone can say anything they like. Unless the article on Snopes at Wikipedia includes direct, true citations, I doubt anyone would consider it a trustworthy source.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Theresa 2012/01/23 17:57:34
    Theresa
    +1
    No Snopes is a Soros funded group to spread disinformation as if it was truthful.
  • keeper Theresa 2012/01/24 02:58:56
    keeper
    +1
    Exactly!!
  • edifyguy 2012/01/23 03:18:28
    edifyguy
    +1
    I have known this for years. Snopes is good for checking on things like chain email about viruses and similar things where political ideologies have no bearing, but their heavy left-leaning is apparent in certain topics. Like everything you read online, it must be taken with a grain of salt.
  • keeper edifyguy 2012/01/23 17:04:08
    keeper
    +1
    You have the right attitude... thanx for your answer...
  • Phyl *In God i Trust* 2012/01/23 00:55:37
    Phyl *In God i Trust*
    +1
    I never go there because they are for ob.
  • keeper Phyl *I... 2012/01/23 01:07:39
    keeper
    There you go~~
  • moonchild 2012/01/22 23:49:15
    moonchild
    +1
    Sorry- but Snopes generally puts direct references and verifiable sources for their answers. Snopes has always been highly reliable. The person who wrote this post is no big investigator, why should we take her word for it? Anyone can 'claim' anything- but usually offer very little to back it up.

    Snopes only comes into question when people would rather believe B.S. than verifiable facts.
  • keeper moonchild 2012/01/22 23:54:36
    keeper
    +1
    Would you look at this post , and then try to defend snopes~~
    http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
  • moonchild keeper 2012/01/23 00:29:47
    moonchild
    +1
    Where are the links to snopes' denial of such dockets? I don't consider the poster of that poll reliable- in fact, I'm blocked by him or her. Not surprising.
  • keeper moonchild 2012/01/23 01:09:23
    keeper
    The links are listed there... read what is being said...Kagan worked for obama and Snopes says she didn't!!!!!!!!!
  • moonchild keeper 2012/01/23 01:12:05
    moonchild
    +1
    There are no links to the so-called snopes debunk- only dismissed dockets. Where is the snopes article she is talking about?
  • keeper moonchild 2012/01/23 01:28:27
    keeper
    Please look at who the defendants lawyer is...Kagan and snopes said she was not involved!

    Attorneys for Respondents:
    Elena Kagan Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
    Counsel of Record


    http://www.supremecourt.gov/S...
  • moonchild keeper 2012/01/23 01:34:02
    moonchild
    +1
    I see the court docket, but where is the link to the snopes article?
  • Robert K keeper 2012/01/23 07:10:44
    Robert K
    Why can't you display the supposed Snopes.com stating she didn't?
  • keeper Robert K 2012/01/23 17:05:57
    keeper
    Read the post. The correspondence was between another person and Snopes. Why don't you and you friend above write to snopes yourself? Then you could make a post about what you found out.
  • Robert K keeper 2012/01/24 06:54:04 (edited)
    Robert K
    So you can't back up your lies, thank you for admitting that

    LOL, you must see pink elephants as well, because nowhere did I call you a name, but I am used to cowardly acts by those called on their lies
  • keeper Robert K 2012/01/24 16:52:31
    keeper
    You just deserved an adios from me... I don't appreciate being called names..
    have a good life inside your box~~
  • mustangluver 2012/01/22 22:46:37
    mustangluver
    +3
    Def NOT..they are big libs! They lie for BO too. I had a huge fight with them some yrs back and they told me if i didn't stop telling ppl negative things about them that they would sue me for slander..we went back and forth for yrs and i proved them wrong!!! It is a man and woman who own the site..
  • keeper mustang... 2012/01/22 23:56:37
    keeper
    +3
    A liberal husband and wife that are partially funded by Soros
    http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
  • keeper 2012/01/22 22:23:06
    keeper
    Here is another great post on the veracity of Snopes~~
    http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 22 Next » Last »

About Me

keeper

keeper

Port Isabel, TX, US

2008/05/14 19:08:52

"..the Howling of Imbedded Hues"

View complete profile

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals