The bar for what constitutes a religion is really low. However, "religion" does not mean "good" any more than it means "bad".
Additionally, the Church of Scientology itself is essentially a criminal organization.
Add a comment above
Top Opinion
-
SFF 2012/07/12 12:45:23Yes because




















"Scientology is not, and does not claim to be, a religion. The general attitude of its founder is hostile to and disparaging of religion."
The Anderson Report, 1965 available here in full:
http://exscientologistsirela...
That's a win for the Flying Spaghetti Monster over the Church of Scientology in my book.
It was started in the 1950s by a science fiction writer named L. Ron Hubbard in fulfilment to his declared aim to start a religion to make money. It is an offshoot to a method of psychotherapy he concocted from various sources which he named "Dianetics". Dianetics is a form of regression therapy. It was then further expanded to appear more like a religion in order to enjoy tax benefits. He called it "Scientology".
Scientology is a confused concoction of crackpot, dangerously applied psychotherapy, oversimplified, idiotic and inapplicable rules and ideas and science-fiction drivel that is presented to its members (at the "advanced" levels) as profound spiritual truth.
Additionally, the Church of Scientology itself is essentially a criminal organization.
I, too, would have preferred an Undecided box to tick. 'Technically,' or at least legally, it seems to have met the definition. There's an object or objects of worship, a dogma/doctrine, proselytes, etc.
(I would suggest a bit of 'independent' research, however. These dudes are stra-a-ange! I know the same thing could be said about us Christians, but IMO, Scientologists beat us hands down in the weird department.!
"Someone" must either think you'd be ignorant enough to make bad comments about something you're uninformed about or that you'd be vile enough to make bad comments about Scientology without any reason.
OR she knows there's tons of valid, fact-based criticism of Scientology out there and wants you to shut up about it if you discover it.
Which do you think it is? Or do you see another option that I missed?
And yeah, she sends e-mails to people commenting on Scientology a lot. I bet she went on and on about how awesome Scientology is and how all the critics are just bigoted haters and all that and how you should ignore them, and never say anything bad about Scientology. Doesn't that make you wonder?
The only criticism of you that I have, is that you promised such a thing before getting informed about it. No offense. Believe me, when you do some independent research (not limited to Scientology sites), you'll regret your promise, if you are the kind of person I believe you to be.
Scientologists will always tell you to get informed about Scientology exclusively through Scientology sources, and to disregard any other sources, which are predominantely negative and provide proof of the corruption and abuses going on in organized Scientology. Anonymous will always tell you to look ...
And yeah, she sends e-mails to people commenting on Scientology a lot. I bet she went on and on about how awesome Scientology is and how all the critics are just bigoted haters and all that and how you should ignore them, and never say anything bad about Scientology. Doesn't that make you wonder?
The only criticism of you that I have, is that you promised such a thing before getting informed about it. No offense. Believe me, when you do some independent research (not limited to Scientology sites), you'll regret your promise, if you are the kind of person I believe you to be.
Scientologists will always tell you to get informed about Scientology exclusively through Scientology sources, and to disregard any other sources, which are predominantely negative and provide proof of the corruption and abuses going on in organized Scientology. Anonymous will always tell you to look at both sides and come to your own conclusions.
I don't have any beef with individual Scientologists (except the OSA handlers on the internet doing damage control, but even with them I know they're just mislead and manipulated). Everyone can believe whatever they want as far as I'm concerned, however ridiculous those beliefs may sound to me personally. My grudge is exclusively with the Scientology enterprise.
I have no problem whatsoever with the Freezone or the Independent Scientologists either - the Church of Scientology does. Find out how far the Church of Scientology's "religious tolerance" goes when it's about people practicing Scientology without paying them for it; why Scientologists outside of the "Church" are actually loosely allied with critics like me; and how those Independent Scientologists are actually trying to SAVE Scientology - the religion - from the current leader of the Church of Scientology, David Miscavige.
Do some research on your own - that's all I'm asking. Find out why she made you promise never to make bad comments about Scientology. When you do, you'll see my posts - and hers - in a totally different light. I promise you THAT.
Have a nice day.
Why wouldn't it be?