Is Chris Christie, too fat to be president?

SLIDESHOW: too fat

• Spizzzo BN-0 2011/10/03 14:10:19
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  No, he's too conservative and obnoxious to be President.

  reply
• lucky 2011/10/03 13:28:03
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  Nonsense although there are unfortunately people that are that shallow.

  reply
• wtf12345 2011/10/03 13:24:53
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +1

  Progressive\Liberals so concerned on weight. Sounds like a Sal Alinsky tactic they are using.

  reply
• FluffyCupcakespanker~PWCM~JLA 2011/10/03 13:08:12
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +1

  If we worry about his weight, then it might as well be ;too ugly; too skinny; too dorky...Should not matter.

  reply
• Assassi... to FluffyC... 2011/10/03 13:30:31
  

  +1

  Its already like that. I'm not being a jerk, but it is....Michelle Obama is "too ugly, or fat" to even be first lady. If we hold their wives to that standard why not hold them to the same standard?

  reply
• Pug For Huck 2011/10/03 02:47:23
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +1

  Until it becomes more important than citizenship, or fidelity, or smoking, It's not an important enough issue.
  
  Besides, we have Obamacare.

  reply
• mg's haven~POTL~PWCM~JLA 2011/10/03 00:40:45
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +1

  Oh no this is bull He is not the first person to be weighty and president at the same time.
  HE DOESN'T EVEN WANT TO RUN LET HIM BE FCOL

  reply
• Assassi... to mg's ha... 2011/10/03 13:31:14
  

  He would be the first in at LEAST 50 years.

  reply
• mg's ha... to Assassi... 2011/10/03 18:29:21
  

  Like i said He doesn't want to run. People are still pestering him to do it.

  reply
• *Mahogany Goddess of P.H.A.E.T 2011/10/02 20:55:03
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +1

  Lets look at all the candidates that are attractive, yet are not the best person for the job.
  

  reply
• Live Free Or Die 2011/10/02 19:34:34
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +1

  Just no.

  reply
• studiobrat BN-0 AFCL 2011/10/02 19:23:19
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +2

  How shallow is that?!! His weight should not affect the American voters.

  reply
• Reggie☮ 2011/10/02 17:37:02
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +1

  As long as the fat isn't in his brain impeding his thought process. Look at Mr. Thin Guy, his head is full of air.

  reply
• Loverofcountry 2011/10/02 17:29:04
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +2

  It's just nonsense. We have had fat presidents before, Taft, Cleveland, McKinley, Taylor, Theodore Roosevelt.

  reply
• Steve Johnson 2011/10/02 16:55:37
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  There is more fat between Obama's ears than there is on Christie's entire body.Does any rational person think that a junior stimuls package (a/k/a the "Jobs" Bill) is a solution to our economic problems? Obama insults our intelligence - as usual.
  
  Electing Christie (or anyone beside the current officeholder) would remove dead weight from the economy.

  reply
• JT For Political Reform 2011/10/02 16:51:59
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +1

  No, is Obama too stupid to be president? Evidently not, because he is the president.

  reply
• Reggie☮ to JT For ... 2011/10/02 17:33:24
  

  +1

  Great answer

  reply
• BIGK27 2011/10/02 16:35:47
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  Did Moosechelle Obama say something again?
  

  reply
• Assassi... to BIGK27 2011/10/02 20:10:54
  

  +1

  So fat matters in a first lady, but not a president? Huh?

  reply
• BIGK27 to Assassi... 2011/10/03 03:12:28
  

  Are you saying Michelle is fat? that's not nice.

  reply
• Assassi... to BIGK27 2011/10/03 13:32:19
  

  Oh my my, we have a clever one today. mmmkay.

  reply
• Pearlie Momi♥Patriot Warrior♥ 2011/10/02 16:27:05
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +1

  So What , who cares. He has the brains and that is what counts.The left will will stop at nothing, when they fear their threat...More power to Christie !!

  reply
• bill 2011/10/02 16:17:33
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  The MSM didn't say a world about Obama being too inexperienced!

  reply
• Dum Luk 2011/10/02 16:09:00
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +1

  Taft needed an extra-large bathtub installed in the White House.

  reply
• sonofason 2011/10/02 14:30:30
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +1

  If he runs, he will have my vote.

  reply
• abubincrazy 2011/10/02 14:22:17
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +3

  So the socialists are attacking his weight?
  No surprise, since he's a heavyweight threat to them.

  reply
• maggiemay 2011/10/02 14:10:03 (edited)
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +2

  I don't care if they have two heads as long as they can do the damn job. There is way to much emphasis put on how a person looks in this country. Your fat, skinny,cute,ugly, old, and the list goes on, and on..
  
  Everyone needs to get over it,and look inside the person. I've seen some beautiful people who are pure ugliness inside, and dumb as a rock.
  
  Women voted for Obama because they saw him as a good looking man, and sexy. That's the wrong reason to vote for anyone. Give me a freak of nature if they can lead,and get this country back on it's feet.

  reply
• Barefooted Nana ∞ijm♥∞AFCL 2011/10/02 14:03:09
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +6

  Are we voting like the beauty contests now!?!?!?! For the Love of Pete!!!!! btw.....this goes for the R man too....don't be taken in by looks! Look what we got the last time...geeez

  reply
• Pearlie... to Barefoo... 2011/10/02 16:29:36
  

  +2

  Right..Who cares, he has the brains and more power to him. You are funny, true that, Look what we got,a no brainier, succeeded in hiding records..

  reply
• Barefoo... to Pearlie... 2011/10/02 20:47:29
  

  +1

  Thank you Girlfriend!!!! :D

  reply
• masatone 2011/10/02 13:54:49
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +2

  To be perfectly honest it don't matter who gets elected.
  
  

  

  reply
• Matt M 2011/10/02 13:52:08
  No, who cares what he weighs

  

  +2

  A fat guy for POTUS? With all the improvements that our society needs to make in personal accountablity for health, POTUS should clearly be a role model.
  
  I am sure that if we ever had a POTUS candiate that...hmmm...i dunno...maybe hypothetically was a smoker or something like that...the media would be all over it, right? Regardless of party, right?

  reply
• Assassi... to Matt M 2011/10/02 13:55:55
  

  +3

  I think we have heard about Obamas nasty smoking habit quite a lot.

  reply
• Matt M to Assassi... 2011/10/02 13:58:38
  

  oh come one...when we was on his rise, he was given a major major pass by the media. It was mentioned, but it was never, "an issue".

  reply
• Assassi... to Matt M 2011/10/02 14:03:53
  

  +2

  This is what comes of instigating attacks on the personal bad habits of everyone. Michelle Obamas ass is too big. Obama is a smoker. Chris Christie is too fat. Michelle Bachman gets migraines. Oh and YES, I have heard it ad nauseum, about the smoking. http://einhornpress.com/image...

  reply
• Assassi... to Matt M 2011/10/02 14:05:30
  

  +2

  

  reply
• Matt M to Assassi... 2011/10/02 14:36:09
  

  nice collection of internet nonsense.
  
  Still does not answer the media question. For anyone else, smoking would have been a fatal flaw at the begining of a run for anything beyond county trash comissioner. The media barely touch it when he started. And that's the point, not that some boneheads have to much time with photoshop.
  
  Journalism classes need to cover the last two successful presidential candidates. Bush was a dumb ass who failed at everything he ever tried and had no political experience. Texas is a big state, but its governship is, by design, nut much more than a figurehead. obama was even worse. Not only a failure, but evidently a worthless slacker for most of his life, with a vague charisma that carried his sorry ass.
  
  I've said it before, we need to stop electing these Being There style non-people.
  
  You're upset, with personal attacks? OK, won't argue with you.

  reply
• Assassi... to Matt M 2011/10/02 14:42:27
  

  +2

  Actually Matt, I'm not "upset" at all. I am just saying, whats good for one is good for another and where does it end? I was horrified when people attacked Palin's children, and when they call Obama's mother and father, chimpanzees. I am just saying, when does the bashing over things that mean nothing for the future of the country stop? I am not impressed with any of it. I think as a country we should focus on issues....Not on BS like whether someone is fat, or they eat chicken, or they smoke.....None of that matters at all.

  reply
• Matt M to Assassi... 2011/10/02 15:03:41
  

  +1

  hehe...I know, you're never upset. Then annoyed with the personal attacks.
  
  There was an interesting post here a couple of days ago by Ron. His observation was that well reasoned and supported arguments were never the top response, but that ad hominem attacks and idiotic pictures were. Of course my response to him was, "Yeah? well F you, Ron!"
  
  I dunno, it's concerning.

  reply