People are much more than the sum of their comments, and anyone who really thinks that they can accurately assess others based solely on such limited info is:

|
|
|||||
|
63 votes
|
|
76% | |||
|
20 votes
|
|
24% | |||
Yes, Sister.
I fully understand that it's your personal opinion.
I was asking your reasoning for that opinion.
If you don't want to share that reasoning, that's fine.
I was blocked for asking this question. I was not aware that it was offensive.
MisterD (wise smart gentleman)
That VietnamVet fellow (may be of native American decent). Wise, interesting and thoughtful.
FanO'reilly
HOMBRE
Herb
Wild card pick: Shigyrl (that girl can think)
Because even if you go in with the best of intentions, people who can't stand you will slander, attack and defame everything you do.
Evasive, dishonest and Atheist are not qualities we need in a President. I've whipped his butt too many times in debate. I wouldn't trust Disko to feed my dog.
Most of the wars you mention had nothing do do with religion.
The early Crusades were justified. They later Crusades were more about Kings giving wanna-be kings (Dukes) something to do in a land far-far away.
Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Kim jung -
Atheism is madness if taken seriously. Fortunately, most Atheists don't live as if Atheism were correct. Unfortunately, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Kim Jung, Milosevic, Ceaucescu did live consistently with their Atheism. It's absolutely obvious why mass atrocities so reliably resulted under atheist rule. With more than 100 MILLION slaughtered and half the planet enslaved in less than this past century, it's irresponsible to deny the horrific reality of Atheism taken seriously