Quantcast

If you could add or change one thing in America's constitution, what would it be?

Teri- Oregon 2012/07/08 06:11:44
Related Topics: Party, America, ADD
You!
Add Photos & Videos
I would make political parties illegal.
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • ThickAzABrick 2012/07/08 12:08:20
    I would change..........
    ThickAzABrick
    +11
    Repeal the 17th Amendment! By returning the selection of U.S. Senators to State Legislatures LARGE sums of money would be removed from the political process. As it stands now, I can have some influence in each State's election for Senate by being able to contribute money to a candidate. This, to me, is wrong.

    By allowing only a State Legislature to appoint its Federal Senator, that person is then beholden to the interests of their particular State, not large contributors from outside their borders. (i.e. the Koch Brothers, George Soros, the NRA or PETA). Without out of State money, the Senator only has to keep his/her home Congress happy- which leads me to this.

    The only other change I would make to our brilliant Constitution would be term limits. One term for Representatives and Senators, keeping 2 for the Presidency. No benefits, no expense accounts, and a salary that represents the Median income of their home state. This would encourage keeping jobs in America, and help to keep Legislators in touch with people's day to day lifestyle. The idea of a full-time job in Congress is wrong. You should live amongst your constituents, occasionally going to D.C. to conduct business.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Technotrucker_exposingthetruth 2012/07/10 08:02:31 (edited)
    I would change..........
    Technotrucker_exposingthetruth
    +2
    I would start with the 16th. You know the one that allowed the Federal Reserve to use a Gestapo force to collect interest for the money they print and loan back to the US Govt. That would leave the Fed with no source of income, and they would shrivel and die. Since it was never legally ratified to begin with, shouldn't be a big loss, and a huge gain. That is just a start.
  • Windy 2012/07/10 07:40:00
    I would change..........
    Windy
    +2
    it by repealing the 17th Amendment and adding in a clause making it clear that the final check on government power is the PEOPLE by giving a clear and easy way to recall any elected official.
  • Teri- O... Windy 2012/07/10 08:53:56
    Teri- Oregon
    +2
    I like that one!
  • ⚜3rd Street Boss⚜ 2012/07/09 18:13:46
    I would change..........
    ⚜3rd Street Boss⚜
    +1
    Idk.. Id have to think deeply about it..
  • stevmackey 2012/07/09 18:10:25
    I would do nothing, and leave it how it is.
    stevmackey
    +1
    Just see that it is followed.
  • elptrek P.H.A.E.T.'s wizard 2012/07/09 13:12:07 (edited)
    I would put............
    elptrek P.H.A.E.T.'s wizard
    +2
    Political advertising has to be the truth or disbandment of the company, organization who paid for it. Permanent political parties and electoral college will be banned. Corporations are not a person and should be regulated. Tax exempt laws will be enforced on churches.
    A growing number of churches are thumbing their noses at federal law and diving into the political arena . . . putting their 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status at risk.

    According to the I.R.S.’s rules and regulations, a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization (which includes churches) may not “influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates.” It’s simply part of the deal that in order to exist without paying taxes, certain types of political action are off-limits.

    It’s rare, but the I.R.S. can revoke a group’s tax-exempt status if they violate the rules and did so for the first time in 1995. In the last few years, more and more churches, however, are crossing the line on purpose.
  • Michael 2012/07/09 01:20:22
    I would put............
    Michael
    +2
    Article 1: The United States is now and forevermore a secular nation. It does not represent nor does it owe allegiance to any religion, church or spiritual being. No bill, law or statute shall be enacted in support of a religious tenet unless it can to be shown to be without opposition by any Citizen or group of Citizens, and furthermore must demonstrate a purely secular purpose. No public servant shall be questioned on religious beliefs nor may those beliefs be used in support or opposition to a candidacy.
  • Wolf97 Michael 2012/07/11 00:52:03
    Wolf97
    I would fight to the death to keep something like that from happening.
  • ghostrider Wolf97 2012/08/05 03:39:18
    ghostrider
    +1
    So, you support the concept of the dreaded 'Sharia Law'?
  • Wolf97 ghostrider 2012/08/05 13:04:19
    Wolf97
    I apologize, it would appear I read your comment wrong. I am an athiest but I thought your comment was saying something that it was not. My mistake.
  • ghostrider Wolf97 2012/08/05 21:08:03
    ghostrider
    'Welcome to the club' -- (BIG smile) ... I've misread/misunderstood others' comments myself.
  • Teri- O... Wolf97 2012/08/05 06:33:29
    Teri- Oregon
    OMG, How would you feel if I thought your religious rights should be taken away?
  • Wolf97 Teri- O... 2012/08/05 13:06:00
    Wolf97
    I don't think you understand my position on this thread. But I clearly didnt make my point very well. I believe in everyones religious rights. See my above comment to clarify the mistake I made.
  • RobHom 2012/07/08 23:05:30
    I would change..........
    RobHom
    +1
    a lot of things.
    1. No political parties.
    2. No electoral college.
    3. He who gets the most votes wins!
    4. Immigrations tightly regulated. If you can't bring what we want, stay home.
    5. Borders secured. Big fence, lots of guards.
    6. All trade treaties and agreements would be 100% reciprocal in terms.
    7. English is the official language, no other to be used in any government document.
    8. I can think of a bunch of others....but I'm sure you get the point!
  • Dodgerfan 2012/07/08 20:52:31
    I would put............
    Dodgerfan
    +2
    Definitely put in term limits for Congress and maybe even Supreme Court justices. The latter would be a big maybe.
  • tesmith47 2012/07/08 17:44:17 (edited)
    I would put............
    tesmith47
    +2
    D.C. STATEHOOD AUTOMATICALLY, when the d.c. citizens voted for it!!!!
  • sheratan 2012/07/08 16:16:14
    I would change..........
    sheratan
    +2
    Repeal the second amendment and incorporate an amendment for direct election of the president:

    http://en.wikisource.org/wiki...
  • RobHom sheratan 2012/07/08 23:06:25
    RobHom
    +3
    Bad move.
  • sheratan RobHom 2012/07/09 02:44:29
    sheratan
    Many western democracies, like Canada, France or Australia, do not allow gun ownership and are doing just fine.

    Homicidal rates in these countries are lower than in the US...

  • RobHom sheratan 2012/07/09 11:21:21
    RobHom
    +2
    Actually, Canadians do own guns...albeit long guns and permits for handguns are rather difficult to get. Australians own guns, and I fear that someone has fed you bad information regarding France...where 19,000,000 guns are privately owned, and one of the worlds biggest firearms producers is located in France.
    http://www.gunpolicy.org/fire...
  • Teri- O... sheratan 2012/07/08 23:31:11 (edited)
    Teri- Oregon
    +3
    way bad move, it's because of our second amendment that has allowed us to hang on to our freedoms for so long, it's the amendment that has stopped our complete and utter take over.

    I'm sorry but I can not rave you!
  • sheratan Teri- O... 2012/07/09 02:44:03
    sheratan
    +1
    Many western democracies, like Canada, France or Australia, do not allow gun ownership and are doing just fine.

    Homicidal rates in these countries are lower than in the US...

  • ThickAz... sheratan 2012/08/17 02:42:20
    ThickAzABrick
    If you listen to fools, the Mob Rules!

    Republicanism allows for the minority to have a seat at the table, Democracy is simple mob rules- a truly despicable form of governance.
  • Samantha 2012/07/08 15:35:26
    I would put............
    Samantha
    +3
    Incorporate more of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights into the U.S. Constitution.
  • Archer ~ The Limit Break of... 2012/07/08 15:22:27
    I would put............
    Archer ~ The Limit Break of PHAET
    +8
    As an amendment, rather than physically alter such an historic document?

    The equality act - equal rights for everyone, regardless of race, religion, gender, gender-identity, sex, etc. Everyone is equal under the law.
  • BongRipper 2012/07/08 14:13:31
    I would put............
    BongRipper
    +2
    I would put "but this is just a piece of paper" on the bottom
  • Bozette 2012/07/08 14:06:57
    I would change..........
    Bozette
    +4
    That's tough to choose just one, I guess it would be a toss up between the general welfare clause and the 16th amendment.
  • BOOGIE-WOOGIE-MUSIC-MAN-ROC... 2012/07/08 13:42:49
    I would do nothing, and leave it how it is.
    BOOGIE-WOOGIE-MUSIC-MAN-ROCK-N-R
    +2
    But I would tell my family and friends, to download a copy to their iPhone.
  • Tasine 2012/07/08 13:08:34
    I would change..........
    Tasine
    +7
    I would remove the ability of the federal government to meddle in any individual's life, including assessing taxes.
  • Dwight-AFCL>dogsbody 2012/07/08 12:45:08
    I would change..........
    Dwight-AFCL>dogsbody
    +5
    The Commerce Clause and make it more explicit, less ambiguous.

    Define the 2nd amendment better.

    Make sure the taxing power was better defined and limited.
  • John "By God" American 2012/07/08 12:37:04
    I would change..........
    John "By God" American
    +6
    I would specify the penalties for Treason and High Crimes and Misdemeanors and remove the ability for the president to appoint the Attorney General and Supreme Court Justices as well as removing the lifetime appointment for all federal judges.
  • Andy Fletcher 2012/07/08 12:24:01
    I would put............
    Andy Fletcher
    +5
    I would do away with the 17th Amendment and the electoral college.
  • ThickAzABrick 2012/07/08 12:08:20
    I would change..........
    ThickAzABrick
    +11
    Repeal the 17th Amendment! By returning the selection of U.S. Senators to State Legislatures LARGE sums of money would be removed from the political process. As it stands now, I can have some influence in each State's election for Senate by being able to contribute money to a candidate. This, to me, is wrong.

    By allowing only a State Legislature to appoint its Federal Senator, that person is then beholden to the interests of their particular State, not large contributors from outside their borders. (i.e. the Koch Brothers, George Soros, the NRA or PETA). Without out of State money, the Senator only has to keep his/her home Congress happy- which leads me to this.

    The only other change I would make to our brilliant Constitution would be term limits. One term for Representatives and Senators, keeping 2 for the Presidency. No benefits, no expense accounts, and a salary that represents the Median income of their home state. This would encourage keeping jobs in America, and help to keep Legislators in touch with people's day to day lifestyle. The idea of a full-time job in Congress is wrong. You should live amongst your constituents, occasionally going to D.C. to conduct business.
  • Teri- O... ThickAz... 2012/07/08 12:09:51
    Teri- Oregon
    +7
    Very insightful, thank you!
  • RobHom ThickAz... 2012/07/08 23:08:14
    RobHom
    +1
    Huzzah, Huzzah, YAY!!
  • Lady Whitewolf 2012/07/08 09:54:54
    I would change..........
    Lady Whitewolf
    +3
    Make the 2nd Amendment UNargueable
    eliminate the 14th amendment.
  • Elephant Lord 2012/07/08 09:21:04
    I would put............
    Elephant Lord
    +5
    1. No law that discriminates against any specific religion, race, sexual orientation, ideology, or nationality may be passed. (Ex from history: Jim Crow laws, Japanese internment, Chinese Exclusion Act, etc)
    2. Prisoners shall not be subjected to any form of mental or physical torture, whether they are held in US soil or not. (Starvation, water boarding, beatings, starvation, extreme heat/cold, sleep deprivation, etc)
    3. Provide public healthcare. (Virtually all other developed countries have it)
    4. Abolish the sales tax
    5. Legalize online torrent sharing (This one's personal :) Don't take it so seriously)
  • Tasine Elephan... 2012/07/08 13:12:54
    Tasine
    +3
    3. Provide public healthcare (Virtually all other developed countries have it)

    Interesting is that all other developed countries are going broke. We are too because we support half the world. When we are all broke, how do we have universal healthcare?
  • Archer ... Tasine 2012/07/08 15:24:48 (edited)
    Archer ~ The Limit Break of PHAET
    +3
    Not all other developed countries. Germany, Canada, Australia, Japan, and the UK/Britain are doing just fine. Better than we are, at the very least.
  • tesmith47 Tasine 2012/07/08 17:47:44
    tesmith47
    +1
    we DO NOT support the world, we just supply them ARMS

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Fun

2013/05/21 06:33:30

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals