If people evolved from apes, why are there still apes?
Raghunath Roy Choudhury
2012/07/11 18:52:55
|
|
|||||
|
3 votes
|
|
10% | |||
|
7 votes
|
|
23% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
6% | |||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | |||
|
19 votes
|
|
61% | |||






















Only religious people think that is what evolution means.
2. For the same reason that we have little cats and big tigers. Evolution causes different species to branch off. Some branches die off. Others continue. So it's entirely possible for the "mother" species to continue unchanged when a population secluded somewhere evolves and adapts to changes in it's local area.
But anyway, as so many other people have pointed out here, humans didn't evolve from apes directly - Darwin's evolution theory simply claims they both have an ancestral species, and that that species split off into two more to take their environments into account.
Think about Great Britain, for example. Britain formed colonies in America, and then those colonies left Britain in the late 1700s to form the United States. When that happened, Britain didn't vanish into thin air - instead, it stayed behind in England while the U.S. grew and evolved into what it is today.
It's the same way with apes and humans. The early ancestral species met two different environments, and split off into apes and humans to survive in both. The apes are fit for their environment, and we humans are fit for ours.
There are claims that weather forced them to descend from the trees and to evolve...