Hillary Clinton runs against Ron Paul, who would be the winner?

by BOOGIE-WOOGIE-MUSIC-MAN-ROCK-N-R Posted 2012/08/10 12:36:56

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Hillary Clinton	21 votes	33%
	Ron Paul.	43 votes	67%

More polls by BOOGIE-WOOGIE-MUSIC-MAN-ROCK-N-R

ruthannhausman 2012/08/12 19:49:56

Hillary Clinton

+2
Painfully true, Hillary would win. The Clintons have managed to pull a whole lot of wool over America's eyes. And she's pictured as this hard-working, patriotic female. Crap. Sarah Palin is the hard-working, patriotic female in truth and in fact but the progressive camp has managed to excoriate her unmercifully. With the same skill, they would elevate Hillary to pretty much modern-day Joan of Arc status. No kidding.

So if Hillary Clinton were to run, we'd be screwed. That's why I think the Romney camp has been laying back and letting Obama appear to be dazzling the voters, because if Romney were to strike as he certainly will need to, then the progressives would back off and see the picture in toto and realize that Obama is hanging himself. And they'd bring in Hillary to replace him. And she'd win. Because she's been working so very hard for our national interests, you see. And hasn't been able to trip over her tongue, presidentially speaking, too much.

Sorry to insinuate this is a game, but it pretty much is. And although Ron Paul has some nifty patriotic values, he would be eaten alive by Hillary. She's viciously ambitious. You watch. So I'm glad they aren't running. I want Obama to continue to run. As i said, he's gaffing himself into the funny farm ev...

Painfully true, Hillary would win. The Clintons have managed to pull a whole lot of wool over America's eyes. And she's pictured as this hard-working, patriotic female. Crap. Sarah Palin is the hard-working, patriotic female in truth and in fact but the progressive camp has managed to excoriate her unmercifully. With the same skill, they would elevate Hillary to pretty much modern-day Joan of Arc status. No kidding.

So if Hillary Clinton were to run, we'd be screwed. That's why I think the Romney camp has been laying back and letting Obama appear to be dazzling the voters, because if Romney were to strike as he certainly will need to, then the progressives would back off and see the picture in toto and realize that Obama is hanging himself. And they'd bring in Hillary to replace him. And she'd win. Because she's been working so very hard for our national interests, you see. And hasn't been able to trip over her tongue, presidentially speaking, too much.

Sorry to insinuate this is a game, but it pretty much is. And although Ron Paul has some nifty patriotic values, he would be eaten alive by Hillary. She's viciously ambitious. You watch. So I'm glad they aren't running. I want Obama to continue to run. As i said, he's gaffing himself into the funny farm every day. But soon it will be way too late for the democrats to do anything about it. They already sound like a bunch of dorks when they actually get on national TV and "defend Obama's policies." Joke, joke, joke.
(more)

reply
Claybern 2012/08/11 23:42:52

Ron Paul.

Ron would crush Hillary.

reply
Cat 2012/08/11 12:02:42

Hillary Clinton

+1
She'd get all the Dems that are staying home this November.
Anti drug and pro-defense Republicans would go for Hillary too.
Hillary would win by a landslide.

reply
Claybern to Cat 2012/08/11 23:44:36

No way.

reply
Cat to Claybern 2012/08/13 00:17:04

+1
I'd want to hear her economic plan, which I bet would be less harsh than the Romney/Ryan plan. I would vote for her if she had a workable plan.

reply
Claybern to Cat 2012/08/22 23:19:53

+1
She is not electable, even with a good economic plan. Obeyme had a so called good plan and he made things worse.

reply
Cat to Claybern 2012/08/23 04:27:40

Seems like everyone in the DC crowd is damaged goods. Who is electable?

reply
Claybern to Cat 2012/08/30 19:39:54

+1
Romney/Ryan.

reply
Cat to Claybern 2012/08/30 19:43:16

Let's hope you are correct.

reply
BOOGIE-... to Cat 2012/08/12 00:44:00

+1
I agree with you 100%

reply
S and S 2012/08/11 03:02:20

Ron Paul.

+5
no brainer....

reply
ladyjane 2012/08/11 02:25:56

Ron Paul.

+6
No contest - Ron Paul - we need a patriot not a sell out!

reply
Sister Jean 2012/08/11 01:09:39

Ron Paul.

+1
but I wish Hil

reply
Cookie 2012/08/11 01:01:18

Hillary Clinton

+2
Why not Hillary? I totally think the U.S. is ready for a woman President.She damn sure couldn't do any worse than the one we have now.Hillary for President!

reply
Claybern to Cookie 2012/08/11 23:51:04

We don't need a president who couldn't do any worse than the one we have now.

reply
BOOGIE-... to Cookie 2012/08/12 00:53:52

You go cookie, I think Hillary would be just what we need. firearms and drugs are totally out of control in this country. I have been talking to lots of people out here in the real world. who are registered voters and agree with you. I also enjoyed the trip to Birmingham Alabama. thank you, you tell it like it is.

reply
tncdel 2012/08/11 01:01:01

Hillary Clinton

+5
Running for WHAT? For Congress? Hands down Ron Paul would beat Clinton. But not running for president. Don't get me wrong, I'd vote for Ron Paul myself over Clinton. But mainstream voters wouldn't.

Plus Paul would have less chance at being nominated for president than would Clinton, who, if the GOP would find its heart and call for a deportation hearing to remove the dog-eatin' Kenyan with the fake birth certificate, the Dems would replace him with Hell-ary.

reply
BOOGIE-... to tncdel 2012/08/11 10:09:40

Wow, I just had a frightening thought. that if I decided to go to Washington DC, and of course I would carry my service dog with me. while walking through the halls of Congress, they might take my dog away from me, and she would and up and the presidential kitchen.

reply
Cat to BOOGIE-... 2012/08/13 00:20:57

+2
I didn't evern know they had a Chinese chef. lol

reply
BOOGIE-... to Cat 2012/08/13 02:56:17

+1
You never can tell about Washington DC. They probably have a Chinese cook stashed in the Congressional cafeteria. and some of those congressmen are Deerhunters. and those guys will Skin and field dress not only our tax dollars, but pork as well. so I wouldn't trust some of those guys around my dog.

reply
Ron in ... to BOOGIE-... 2012/08/13 03:07:38

They also eat English Long Pork in Indonesia.

reply
*K'eim*h3reg' *Peh2u *Meg' 2012/08/10 23:54:44

Hillary Clinton

+2
Because most Democrats and all the Neocons would vote for her. Establishment Repugs have long had a love affair with Hillary, especially on foreign policy.

I grant you that it would be a close race.

reply
Katherine to *K'eim*... 2012/08/11 01:30:30

+7
I find it hard to believe any republicans would have a love affair with Hillary when she's spent her entire political career manufacturing and using any opportunity to insult them.

reply
Sweet-N... to Katherine 2012/08/11 18:36:53

+3
And most recently, trying to take our guns with the help of the UN. Remember, she was also the first one to make a play for socialized medicine. If those two were my choices, Ron Paul would get my vote for sure. I don't agree with him on foreign policy, but that's the only thing I don't agree with him on.

reply
Katherine to Sweet-N... 2012/08/11 21:48:35

+2
Correct and I agree with your post 100%.

reply
HillaryLover 2012/08/10 23:01:26

Hillary Clinton

+3
Seriously. Did Ron Paul carry a single primary state in the 2008 or 2012 Republican primaries? C'mon, get real. Hillary Clinton actually received more primary votes than Barack Obama in the 2008 Democratic primaries.

reply
rdmatheny 2012/08/10 22:47:26

Ron Paul.

+4

reply
Katherine to rdmatheny 2012/08/10 23:16:42

+2
That we've inherited: blame Bush
There's a definite end date: set by Bush.
The "president" did close Gitmo: he did?
More money for diplomacy and development? What, a parasol made of gold?
There's more musicians in the military than fighters? Well there's a place to cut.
Gushing compliments Paul so he'll forget the deluge of lies and misdirection she told.

reply
Philo-CommieHater! 2012/08/10 19:59:41

Ron Paul.

+7
Too bad that's NOT the lineup...

reply
gregaj7 2012/08/10 19:26:45

Ron Paul.

+8
IF people are truly listening and paying attention.

reply
Ron in Oregon 2012/08/10 18:25:38

Ron Paul.

+4
Who would Hillary have in the Oval Office doing her under the Resolute Desk.

reply
Cat to Ron in ... 2012/08/11 12:05:31

+1
Are you seeking an internship perhaps? lol

reply
Ron in ... to Cat 2012/08/11 21:10:08

+3
I'm not female enough for her.

reply
Cat to Ron in ... 2012/08/13 00:22:40

+1
I see your point there.

reply
Stan Kapusta 2012/08/10 18:22:11

Ron Paul.

+9
Hellary has shown what she thinks of America by her actions as Secretary of State. The recent sellout Small Arms Treaty'. Along with her promotion of all the job stealing Free Trade Agreements. Being a Bilderburg attendee doesn't sit well either. Puts her on the bottom of my list. Paul at least is for America. Not the NWO crap.

reply
kevracer 2012/08/10 17:22:21

Hillary Clinton

+4
in a landslide

reply
Dwight-AFCL>dogsbody 2012/08/10 17:15:58

Ron Paul.

+6
No doubt.

reply
SiliconSorcerer 2012/08/10 16:05:56

Ron Paul.

+3
I know who would be the loser, America!
He's got some great ideas, but the few f...king crazy ones just put him out.

reply
rdmatheny to Silicon... 2012/08/10 22:56:27

+4
Yeah, those freaking founding fathers were nothing but a bunch of looney tunes with their goofy, insane constitution. Anyone who believes in the constitution and wants to enforce it, belongs in a psych ward. /s

reply
ladyjane to rdmatheny 2012/08/11 02:34:29 (edited)

Maybe you should be living in another country? Because of our Constitution you're sitting there and able to say exactly what you think - and don't you forget that...If you didn't mean what you say then I hope the others here take heed to the fact that if Obama or someone like him gets in they will be kissing their freedom of speech goodbye!

reply