I'm a Facebook loser... I have no friends on it.... and the ones I do have are ones I thought I knew but don't want to know anymore... My account is in limbo... I never log on... It's boring... and those FB games suck!!!
I like SodaHead because you don't need any lame friends or play dumb games to boost your status... SodaHead give you stuff to do... You can answer questions and give your opinion about stuff whether people like what you say or not...
You’re not a loser. It’s just that all the folks that use fb are predestined to be what the founder (zucker)-berg thinks of and had said about all his users of the site… http://www.theregister.co.uk/...
I’m just thankful I’m sure not one of them and never will use that scum of a site
Why I hate Facebook: Tracking users after they log out and violating US wiretapping laws these are the allegations behind a 15-billion-dollar nationwide class-action lawsuit filed against Facebook in California.
The suit, combining 21 cases of alleged privacy violations by the social networking giant, was filed on Friday in the Federal Court in San Jose, Emil Protalinski writes on ZDNet.com. In their consolidated complaint, the plaintiffs claim that Facebook used cookies to track them across the Internet.
And yet, where does the staggering sum of the lawsuit come from? Violation of the Federal Wiretap Act provides suggests compensation of US $100 per day per user for every case of violation, up to a maximum of US $10,000 per user. The accusations also fall under the Computer Fraud and Abuse act, the Stored Communications Act, as well as various California Statutes and California common law.
This is not just a damages action, but a groundbreaking digital-privacy rights case that could have wide and significant legal and business implications, said David Straite, a partner at Stewarts Law. The firm is one of the plaintiffs leading the claim.
Accusations that Facebook used cookies to track its users even after they log out are countless. However, all such claims have been turned ...
Why I hate Facebook: Tracking users after they log out and violating US wiretapping laws these are the allegations behind a 15-billion-dollar nationwide class-action lawsuit filed against Facebook in California.
The suit, combining 21 cases of alleged privacy violations by the social networking giant, was filed on Friday in the Federal Court in San Jose, Emil Protalinski writes on ZDNet.com. In their consolidated complaint, the plaintiffs claim that Facebook used cookies to track them across the Internet.
And yet, where does the staggering sum of the lawsuit come from? Violation of the Federal Wiretap Act provides suggests compensation of US $100 per day per user for every case of violation, up to a maximum of US $10,000 per user. The accusations also fall under the Computer Fraud and Abuse act, the Stored Communications Act, as well as various California Statutes and California common law.
This is not just a damages action, but a groundbreaking digital-privacy rights case that could have wide and significant legal and business implications, said David Straite, a partner at Stewarts Law. The firm is one of the plaintiffs leading the claim.
Accusations that Facebook used cookies to track its users even after they log out are countless. However, all such claims have been turned down so far on the grounds that cookies are simply not legally considered to be wiretaps. Proving damage is also a challenge here.
In September, the Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) in Ireland, where Facebook has its international headquarters, agreed to conduct a privacy audit of the networks activities. Interestingly enough, and thankfully for Facebook, the three-month audit concluded that the company makes innovative use of cookies to identify unusual or suspicious activity on an account.
As for now, Facebook insists "this complaint is without merit" and prepares to "fight it vigorously" – PCWorld quotes Andrew Noyes, the network's manager of public policy communications.
ooooooooooooooooopppppppppppps! (oops!)...
I meant to click sodahead; i deleted my facebook long ago...
its just so boring... how can sum ppl check theirs, like, every day???
I e-mail them, I can still write and send them letters, I can pick up the phone and can still actually formulate words and sentences and talk to them and hear them too, heck, I can actually get up off my ass and get out in the world to, Hey, actually see and talk and hear them that way too.
Amazing isn't it !!!
Wow, I guess that must be the reason (zucker)-berg thinks of and had called all his users of his site this... http://www.theregister.co.uk/... ...because, and I'm only guessing, because most that use his site must not be able to do the things I said above above anymore, which would make them what the founder of fb right.
I see you live in Waverly. Waverley is a place in Edinburgh, Scotland. Most famously the large railway station in Edinburgh is called Waverley Station after Captain Waverley the hero of the Sir Walter Scott so called Waverley novels.
There is also a borough near me south of London called Waverley but I don't know why.
I didn't know that. Come to think of it, and I am just talking off the top of my head here, I think there are several other cities in the states that are also named Waverly or Waverley. Well, if I remember right anyway. I could be wrong and thinking of a different country.
sometimes i get to fed up with certain user on facebook..every single damn thing they wanted to tell at the wall.. sharing opinion there are sucks..nobody give respond..only hitting the LIKES button..thats all...
I like SodaHead because you don't need any lame friends or play dumb games to boost your status... SodaHead give you stuff to do... You can answer questions and give your opinion about stuff whether people like what you say or not...
I always have an opinion...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/...
I’m just thankful I’m sure not one of them and never will use that scum of a site
The suit, combining 21 cases of alleged privacy violations by the social networking giant, was filed on Friday in the Federal Court in San Jose, Emil Protalinski writes on ZDNet.com. In their consolidated complaint, the plaintiffs claim that Facebook used cookies to track them across the Internet.
And yet, where does the staggering sum of the lawsuit come from? Violation of the Federal Wiretap Act provides suggests compensation of US $100 per day per user for every case of violation, up to a maximum of US $10,000 per user. The accusations also fall under the Computer Fraud and Abuse act, the Stored Communications Act, as well as various California Statutes and California common law.
This is not just a damages action, but a groundbreaking digital-privacy rights case that could have wide and significant legal and business implications, said David Straite, a partner at Stewarts Law. The firm is one of the plaintiffs leading the claim.
Accusations that Facebook used cookies to track its users even after they log out are countless. However, all such claims have been turned ...
The suit, combining 21 cases of alleged privacy violations by the social networking giant, was filed on Friday in the Federal Court in San Jose, Emil Protalinski writes on ZDNet.com. In their consolidated complaint, the plaintiffs claim that Facebook used cookies to track them across the Internet.
And yet, where does the staggering sum of the lawsuit come from? Violation of the Federal Wiretap Act provides suggests compensation of US $100 per day per user for every case of violation, up to a maximum of US $10,000 per user. The accusations also fall under the Computer Fraud and Abuse act, the Stored Communications Act, as well as various California Statutes and California common law.
This is not just a damages action, but a groundbreaking digital-privacy rights case that could have wide and significant legal and business implications, said David Straite, a partner at Stewarts Law. The firm is one of the plaintiffs leading the claim.
Accusations that Facebook used cookies to track its users even after they log out are countless. However, all such claims have been turned down so far on the grounds that cookies are simply not legally considered to be wiretaps. Proving damage is also a challenge here.
In September, the Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) in Ireland, where Facebook has its international headquarters, agreed to conduct a privacy audit of the networks activities. Interestingly enough, and thankfully for Facebook, the three-month audit concluded that the company makes innovative use of cookies to identify unusual or suspicious activity on an account.
As for now, Facebook insists "this complaint is without merit" and prepares to "fight it vigorously" – PCWorld quotes Andrew Noyes, the network's manager of public policy communications.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/...
I loathe Facebook...
I meant to click sodahead; i deleted my facebook long ago...
its just so boring... how can sum ppl check theirs, like, every day???
http://www.theregister.co.uk/...
And on Sodahead you don't get any goofy, bleed-you-dry games like FarmVille!
I talk to all my friends and family also.
I e-mail them, I can still write and send them letters, I can pick up the phone and can still actually formulate words and sentences and talk to them and hear them too, heck, I can actually get up off my ass and get out in the world to, Hey, actually see and talk and hear them that way too.
Amazing isn't it !!!
Wow, I guess that must be the reason (zucker)-berg thinks of and had called all his users of his site this...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/...
...because, and I'm only guessing, because most that use his site must not be able to do the things I said above above anymore, which would make them what the founder of fb right.
There is also a borough near me south of London called Waverley but I don't know why.
My vote is for SH and my comment was going to be: "Duh"