Ever have someone block you to get the last word in an argument?

Just yesterday some very unkind person was making rude remarks to everyone regardless of what they posted, and as I dislike cyber bullies I gave her a little what for and she said my profile was fake, she was some kind of big time person here at SH just ask anybody and proceeded to block me which was fine because I don't care for people with diarrhea of the mouth and poop for brains that pick on folks and act like a aggressive fool.

Sometimes to some people being right is more important than accepting truth. As difficult as it is, I try to consider what I did to incite that reaction and try to improve on my own ability to allow me to separate opinions from facts in order to make sure I am correct or spread the knowledge I know to be true. Not much can be done about it, and most times, not even worth them time to correct a person that is unwilling to accept reality

*worth the time

Yes.....a few times. .

Too many times...

All the time.

I dont think its being a coward just because they said something then blocked u i think they were just tired of arguing. and besides that what person really wants to argue on the computer to begin with? If u have something to say and want to be heard u do it face to face the ones doing it online are the cowards to begin with

It's a form of surrender.

Happens all the time to me. I later reply to myself or edit my comment stating that I won, and recently I started calling them noobs. :)

People do it all the time.

I get annoyed at first, but then I just brush it off.

Yes, and it's incredibly annoying :/

many times

Of course, it's only human to get the last word if you're going to block. You can go back and edit your previous post and then you get the last word! I think it's cheap but it happens to me all the time and it doesn't bother me.

Nope.

When you slam a Liberal with facts they will block you. They hate facts because facts never support the party line.

Liberals can only spew accusations, fallacies, and personal attacks (name calling).

Conservatives do the same. Let's just say that if the person who blocked me doesn't identify as Conservative, she should.

Marxist Liberals can't produce facts. However, let me slam the Liberal with facts.

Bush brought in 2.523 trillion dollars of revenue in 2008. The recession started in Dec 2007. Now look what Obama’s policies did to revenues for 2009, 2010, and 2011. In 3 years Obama hasn’t been able to produce the revenues that George Bush brought in 2008.

Year / Revenues (in Trillions)
2008 2.523
2009 2.104
2010 2.162
2011 2.303
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb...
Table 1.1

I'm not a Liberal. I'm a Libertarian.

Democrats call themselves many names. They call themselves Liberals, Moderates, and Progressive. The Communist party calls themselves progressives.

I could care less what someone calls themself.

A Marxist is an individual that supports the teachings and ideology of Karl Marx. Liberals support the teaching and ideology of Karl Marx. Therefore, Liberals are Marxist.

Karl Marx said; “Democracy is the road to socialism.”
Karl Marx said; “From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need.”

http://thinkexist.com/quotes/...

Didn’t Obama pass Obamacare in the Senate without a single Republican vote? Didn’t Obamacare transfer wealth from those with abilities to those of need? Wasn’t the justification for Obamacare that 30 million people needed it?

If you walk like a duck and you talk like a duck, you are a duc

Let me try this again: I'm not a Liberal. I'm a Libertarian. They are two different things.
We Libertarians believe in economic and social freedom. In other words, I believe in Laissez-faire like a Conservative, yet I have the same social beliefs of a Liberal (LGBT rights, strong civil liberties, etc.). There are other details, but that's the basic concept.
So, no, I'm not a Liberal.

You can claim anything you want.

"Claim?" I'm stating a fact. Big difference there.

You can't prove it is a fact!

If you're saying that I can't prove that what I said about my party is fact, yes I can...
http://www.lp.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

No, I am saying you are not what you claim to be.

Not to appear rude, but you don't know me, so how do you think you can tell me that I'm not who I claim to be? That makes no sense.

You are on the internet. I claim to be a retired CPA. I can't prove it on the internet.

If I gave my name which may or may not be true and my certificate which I could have produced myself it still doesn't prove anything on the internet.

Or, you could take my word for it when I say I'm a Libertarian. The real question is why you're being so analytical about the matter, and why I would lie about my political party. There's no point in that.

I don't care what you are.

So all Liberals block you because of these facts, huh?
I find that funny, because I'm a Liberal and I've never blocked anybody on this site.

Personally, I've seen many conservatives block me because they wouldn't open up their minds to different interpretations and different ways.
They'd rather just call me an idiot and run away.

You claim to produce to facts but you can't! Let me slam you with facts.



Marxism doesn't work!

If I could show you who blocked me you'd say different.

Show me who blocked you.

Come on Liberal produce facts but you can't!

When Obama took over, revenues fell through the floor and spending increased dramatically.

Year /Revenues / Outlays / Deficit or Surplus
2000 2,025,191 /1,788,950 /236,241
2001 1,991,082 /1,862,846 /128,236
2002 1,853,136 /2,010,894 /-157,758
2003 1,782,314 /2,159,899 /-377,585
2004 1,880,114 /2,292,841 /-412,727
2005 2,153,611 /2,471,957 /-318,346
2006 2,406,869 /2,655,050 /-248,181
2007 2,567,985 /2,728,686 /-160,701
2008 2,523,991 /2,982,544 /-458,553
2009 2,104,989 /3,517,677 /-1,412,688
2010 2,162,724 /3,456,213 /-1,293,489
2011 2,3203,700 /3,603,0601 /-1,299,595
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb...
Table 1.1

Why sould Repulicans block you when they can slam you so easily with facts? Look at the public debt that Marxist in the White House created buying votes with welfare programs.

Wait, so just because I can't do something I'm a liberal? What kind of faulty reasoning is that? I can't show you because this site doesn't have that capability to show who blocked you, you moron.

Why should they block you when they slam you with facts at will? Let me show you how easy it is.

"U.S. payrolls expanded by just 80,000 net jobs in June keeping the unemployment rate flat at 8.2 percent, new data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows."

http://www.businessinsider.co...

You can't produce facts to support the party line because Marxism doesn't work! You can only spew accusations, fallacies, and 3rd grade name calling.

Once again, I'm not a Marxist. God. -_-

Try and find the user that calls himself Ed. He's blocked me and he's been ridiculously immature for a 50-something-year-old.

Really? Because more than once a conservative blocked me after yelling a slew of personal attacks and name-calling.

That's exactly what happened to me.

Marxist Liberals can only spew accusations, fallacies, and name calling.

It is easy to slam a Marxist Liberals with facts because Marxism doesn't work! Obama can only buy votes with welfare programs. Vote for me and I will transfer wealth to you. Let me slam you with facts.

“Harry Alford, president and CEO of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, went off on President Obama’s anti-business philosophy on Friday in an interview with Laura Ingraham.

Alford called the administration “Marxist” and “fanatical” and said, “They might as well put on the brown shirts and swastikas.”

http://www.ihatethemedia.com/...

When you slam Marxist Liberals with facts, they block you.

By that logic, you're a Marxist Liberal?

wut