The Theory of Evolution doesn't "promote" anything. It's the best model using the evidence.
It's science - it doesn't need promoting.
Does the Theory of Evolution promote atheism?
Assassin~ Badass Buzz Guru
2012/06/02 02:25:19
|
|
|||||
|
16 votes
|
|
26% | |||
|
45 votes
|
|
74% | |||
Top Opinion
-
Bastion 2012/06/04 15:09:56
"Cuz the Bible Tells Me So"...ain't evidence.
It fundamentally contradicts the Biblical account.
However, I virtually scientifically disproved evolution of the species some years ago in my research and subsequent book, "TWO BIRDS ... ONE STONE!" [2007]
Not only that, but the study virtually vindicates the Biblical account of Adam and Eve, wherein it illustrates that Man and the snake present as diametric Opposites of one another - both behaviourally and anatomically ;)
Amazon.com: 1.0 out of 5 stars 2 reviews
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Drivel, personified 22 May 2007
By Robert A. Saunders - Published on Amazon.com
Amazon Verified Purchase
Apologists for religion may seek justification for their views. They will not find such in this book, which is scientifically silly and logically invalid. Save your money.
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars A Self-Published Abomination of Science and Theology 13 Sep 2011
By Rusty Shackleford - Published on Amazon.com
With superfluous punctuation and quotations, and unnecessary emphases including excessive use of capital letters and entire bolding of paragraphs for apparently no reason, this book is far too visually distracting to read. Towers' thought pattern is incoherent and the flow of the book is extremely disorganized.
His greatest proof is that humans and snakes are "exactly opposite" one another, a claim that is so absurd that it has yet to be repeated by any creationist or intelligent design advocate. If one conducts an Internet search, they are likely to find the author arguing his position... alone.
Whether stating that evolutionists claim that pigs evolved into whales, or implying tha...
Amazon.com: 1.0 out of 5 stars 2 reviews
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Drivel, personified 22 May 2007
By Robert A. Saunders - Published on Amazon.com
Amazon Verified Purchase
Apologists for religion may seek justification for their views. They will not find such in this book, which is scientifically silly and logically invalid. Save your money.
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars A Self-Published Abomination of Science and Theology 13 Sep 2011
By Rusty Shackleford - Published on Amazon.com
With superfluous punctuation and quotations, and unnecessary emphases including excessive use of capital letters and entire bolding of paragraphs for apparently no reason, this book is far too visually distracting to read. Towers' thought pattern is incoherent and the flow of the book is extremely disorganized.
His greatest proof is that humans and snakes are "exactly opposite" one another, a claim that is so absurd that it has yet to be repeated by any creationist or intelligent design advocate. If one conducts an Internet search, they are likely to find the author arguing his position... alone.
Whether stating that evolutionists claim that pigs evolved into whales, or implying that snakes can only be nocturnal, the main argument is a patchwork of logical fallacies and outright falsehoods. Even young earth creationists will find themselves banging their heads against their desks with exasperation.
Stay away. This book will give you a throbbing headache; the only question is whether it is the result of the author's third grade reasoning skills or his third grade writing skills.
"TWO BIRDS ... ONE STONE!"
In reality, the theory of evolution is much more than "just a theory" as the term is normally used.
The word "theory" in normal usage means a guess or a hunch. But in science, a "theory" is a belief that has been generally accepted by scientists as a result of extensive experimentation and/or observation.
Most biologists believe that evolution is more than a theory; it is an established fact. The earth's life forms have, in fact, evolved over billions of years. Species of animals have been recently observed as continuing to evolve, both in the lab and field.
It fundamentally contradicts the Biblical account.
However, I virtually scientifically disproved evolution of the species some years ago in my research and subsequent book, "TWO BIRDS ... ONE STONE!" [2007]
Not only that, but the study virtually vindicates the Biblical account of Adam and Eve, wherein it illustrates that Man and the snake present as diametric Opposites of one another - both behaviourally and anatomically ;)
Assuming that there is no god/s or supernatural creative being/s of any kind, then at some point in history there was a child that was born an atheist and at some point in his/her life came up with the idea that there is a god or some other being that created him/her and everything else in existence. If that didn't happen, then in an atheist's view, there would be no god or supernatural creative being to worship at any point in history.
Children certainly do believe in God until adults get in there - whom these children trust - and put doubt in their minds with many wild theories!! ;)