Do you think that people abuse the "Freedom of Speech" right way too much?

by ☣Master Gothika☣ ™ Posted 2012/06/17 23:04:27

More polls by ☣Master Gothika☣ ™

beach bum 2012/06/18 10:32:17

+1
yes

reply
jackolantyrn356 2012/06/18 01:29:30 (edited)

+1
freedom of Speech has been turned into a Democrat usage of prejoritive to frighten American's into silent. Use what ever word you need to use. It is not a racist thing to utter the "Poo-Pie" phrase.
The Freedom of Speech is a dead on right. It cannot be abused. If people use words that are ioffensive then the public will stop them, .... NOT SOME DAMNED IDOT IN WASHINGTON who Makes the FU%King call... You got that, Ricjhmond?

reply
Metaldane 2012/06/17 23:18:08

+3
No such thing people have the right to say whatever want whenever they want even bashing for example I hate neo nazis with a passion and if I ever get a fatal disease they're going to start to losing members to my marksmanship skills but I would not tolerate anybody who tried taking away their right to be prejudice pricks because that's the same as taking away my rights to argue back.

reply
☣Master... to Metaldane 2012/06/17 23:20:48

+1
It is their right, I'm asking if it's being ABUSED way too much. Ex: "Screw the Christians" doesn't seem fair to me...

reply
Metaldane to ☣Master... 2012/06/17 23:28:10

+1
Neither does most of the politics section here or the all non Christians are evil posts or gays are sick posts get used to it that's life whining about it doesn't change anything I'm not trying to insult you I'm just saying.

reply
☣Master... to Metaldane 2012/06/17 23:32:31

I'm only using that as an EXAMPLE.

reply
Metaldane to ☣Master... 2012/06/17 23:36:21

+2
Poor example you may think Christian get it bad try being an atheist or pagan or especially a satanist then you'll know what oppression is.

reply
☣Master... to Metaldane 2012/06/17 23:37:37

Oh my goodness! It's only an EXAMPLE! Please don't turn this into a religious debate!

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/17 23:58:43

+1
He has a point, though...

reply
☣Master... to 666_Mag... 2012/06/18 00:00:09

Yes he does, but not on this subject.

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/18 00:01:11

+1
It showed relevance... Did it not?

reply
☣Master... to 666_Mag... 2012/06/18 00:03:39

No, it showed no relevance at all to my post.

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/18 00:07:55

+1
"Ex: "Screw the Christians" doesn't seem fair to me.." I'm assuming he used that as an example towards that statement.

reply
☣Master... to 666_Mag... 2012/06/18 00:16:21

The "...doesn't seem fair to me part" was referring to his input on Neo-Nazis as in why should people abuse freedom of speech so they can say that, what about the good?

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/18 00:20:45

+1
Define good.

reply
☣Master... to 666_Mag... 2012/06/18 00:21:56

Good-hearted, respectful, caring, kind, etc.

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/18 00:22:35

+1
....and it's relevance....?

reply
☣Master... to 666_Mag... 2012/06/18 00:25:54

It's relevant to my example in which you rather argue about for some odd reason.

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/18 00:27:24 (edited)

+1
I just saying what he said fit. That is all.

reply
☣Master... to 666_Mag... 2012/06/18 00:28:13

Okay it's your opinion ^_^

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/18 00:30:25

+1
Yes, it is. And I expressed it.

reply
jackola... to Metaldane 2012/06/18 01:33:35

+1
If the atheisist is being verbally inappropiate then the public will fix it.... Nuff said

reply
666_Mag... to Metaldane 2012/06/17 23:26:33

+2
RIGHT!! Love the answer.

reply
Metaldane to 666_Mag... 2012/06/17 23:37:32

+2
Thx;P

reply
Slightly Sophisticated 2012/06/17 23:14:55

+2
Yes, definitely! Yes, you have the right to speak your mind. However, many fail to realize you are limited to what you can say, to who. And that there ARE consequences to everything you do and say. You can say what you like, but that doesn't mean you can always get away with it. Especially if it's rude or uncalled for.

reply
666_Mag... to Slightl... 2012/06/17 23:15:32

+1
In theory....

reply
☣Master... to Slightl... 2012/06/17 23:16:27

My point EXACTLY!

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/17 23:21:52

+1
Still in theory....

reply
☣Master... to 666_Mag... 2012/06/17 23:33:50

In what theory? There's ALWAYS going to be an opposing group with an opposing theory.

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/17 23:34:58

+1
That answer is a theory. ^^^

reply
☣Master... to 666_Mag... 2012/06/17 23:36:18

Then her theory is her answer.

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/17 23:37:13

+1
But she said it like a fact. I was correcting her.

reply
☣Master... to 666_Mag... 2012/06/17 23:38:38 (edited)

Theories are backed up by fact, in this case her opinion.

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/17 23:40:39 (edited)

+1
Theory and opinion are very closely synonymous.

reply
☣Master... to 666_Mag... 2012/06/17 23:45:21

Yes, but theories are opinions, So are yours.

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/17 23:47:16

+1
If I tell her it's a theory it's a fact, facts aren't theories. Hers weren't factually based, mine was by telling her it's a theory. It's not hard to comphrend.

reply
☣Master... to 666_Mag... 2012/06/17 23:50:08 (edited)

I meant SOME theories! Ex: the THEORY of E=mc squared was backed by fact after Einstein proved it.

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/17 23:53:20

+1
That's irrelevant to the subject. We were talking about her theory.

reply
☣Master... to 666_Mag... 2012/06/17 23:54:27

It's not irrelevant if I was backing myself up.

reply
666_Mag... to ☣Master... 2012/06/17 23:57:35 (edited)

+1
It'd be nice if you stayed on subject. Hers was unproven, Einsteins was. That's not much of a back up.

reply